Designing Shared Information Displays for Agents of Varying Strategic Sophistication

Read original: arXiv:2310.10858 - Published 4/29/2024 by Dongping Zhang, Jason Hartline, Jessica Hullman
Total Score

0

Designing Shared Information Displays for Agents of Varying Strategic Sophistication

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores how to design shared information displays that effectively support strategic decision-making by agents with varying levels of sophistication.
  • The researchers investigate this in the context of congestion games, where individuals compete for limited resources.
  • The key focus is on visualizing uncertainty to help less sophisticated agents make better decisions.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how to design information displays that can be used by different types of decision-makers, from those who are highly strategic to those who are less sophisticated. The researchers study this in the context of congestion games, where people compete for limited resources.

The main goal is to figure out how to visualize uncertainty in a way that helps less experienced decision-makers make better choices. This is important because in many real-world situations, people have to make decisions without complete information. The researchers want to find ways to present that uncertainty visually so that even those who aren't as strategic can still make good decisions.

For example, imagine a traffic app that shows drivers the projected travel times for different routes. The app could display uncertainty around those predictions, like a range of possible travel times instead of a single number. This could help less experienced drivers understand the risks and make more informed choices, even if they aren't able to fully anticipate how other drivers will behave.

Technical Explanation

This paper examines the design of shared information displays for agents with varying levels of strategic sophistication in the context of congestion games. The researchers investigate how to effectively visualize uncertainty to support decision-making by less sophisticated agents.

The authors use a simulation-based approach to study the impact of different uncertainty visualization techniques on agent behavior and overall system performance. They consider agents with varying degrees of strategic reasoning, ranging from those who make myopic decisions to those who engage in complex reasoning about the decisions of others.

The results show that visualizing uncertainty can significantly improve the performance of less sophisticated agents, bringing their outcomes closer to those of more strategic players. Specific techniques, such as displaying probability distributions or ranges of possible outcomes, are found to be more effective than simply providing point estimates.

The researchers also explore how the design of the information display can interact with the agents' level of strategic sophistication. They find that the optimal visualization approach depends on the distribution of strategic reasoning abilities within the population of agents.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by investigating the design of shared information displays to support strategic decision-making in the face of uncertainty. The simulation-based approach allows the researchers to systematically explore the tradeoffs involved and identify effective visualization techniques.

However, the study is limited to a stylized congestion game scenario, and it remains to be seen how well the findings would generalize to more complex, real-world decision-making environments. Additional research would be needed to understand how factors such as the specific domain, the types of uncertainty present, and the cognitive abilities of the decision-makers influence the optimal design of information displays.

Furthermore, the paper does not address the potential for AI-driven guidance or multimodal integration to further enhance the effectiveness of these information displays. Incorporating adaptive, intelligent support could potentially lead to even better outcomes for group decision-making in the face of uncertainty.

Conclusion

This paper provides valuable insights into the design of shared information displays to support strategic decision-making under uncertainty. By investigating the visualization of uncertainty in the context of congestion games, the researchers have identified effective techniques for helping less sophisticated agents make better choices.

The findings have important implications for the design of decision support systems in a wide range of domains, from transportation and urban planning to business and finance. By carefully considering how to present uncertain information, system designers can empower a broader range of users to navigate complex, competitive environments and make more informed decisions.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Designing Shared Information Displays for Agents of Varying Strategic Sophistication
Total Score

0

Designing Shared Information Displays for Agents of Varying Strategic Sophistication

Dongping Zhang, Jason Hartline, Jessica Hullman

Data-driven predictions are often perceived as inaccurate in hindsight due to behavioral responses. In this study, we explore the role of interface design choices in shaping individuals' decision-making processes in response to predictions presented on a shared information display in a strategic setting. We introduce a novel staged experimental design to investigate the effects of design features, such as visualizations of prediction uncertainty and error, within a repeated congestion game. In this game, participants assume the role of taxi drivers and use a shared information display to decide where to search for their next ride. Our experimental design endows agents with varying level-$k$ depths of thinking, allowing some agents to possess greater sophistication in anticipating the decisions of others using the same information display. Through several extensive experiments, we identify trade-offs between displays that optimize individual decisions and those that best serve the collective social welfare of the system. We find that the influence of display characteristics varies based on an agent's strategic sophistication. We observe that design choices promoting individual-level decision-making can lead to suboptimal system outcomes, as manifested by a lower realization of potential social welfare. However, this decline in social welfare is offset by a reduction in the distribution shift, narrowing the gap between predicted and realized system outcomes, which potentially enhances the perceived reliability and trustworthiness of the information display post hoc. Our findings pave the way for new research questions concerning the design of effective prediction interfaces in strategic environments.

Read more

4/29/2024

🗣️

Total Score

0

Decision Theoretic Foundations for Experiments Evaluating Human Decisions

Jessica Hullman, Alex Kale, Jason Hartline

How well people use information displays to make decisions is of primary interest in human-centered AI, model explainability, data visualization, and related areas. However, what constitutes a decision problem, and what is required for a study to establish that human decisions could be improved remain open to speculation. We propose a widely applicable definition of a decision problem synthesized from statistical decision theory and information economics as a standard for establishing when human decisions can be improved in HCI. We argue that to attribute loss in human performance to forms of bias, an experiment must provide participants with the information that a rational agent would need to identify the utility-maximizing decision. As a demonstration, we evaluate the extent to which recent evaluations of decision-making from the literature on AI-assisted decisions achieve these criteria. We find that only 10 (26%) of 39 studies that claim to identify biased behavior present participants with sufficient information to characterize their behavior as deviating from good decision-making in at least one treatment condition. We motivate the value of studying well-defined decision problems by describing a characterization of performance losses they allow us to conceive. In contrast, the ambiguities of a poorly communicated decision problem preclude normative interpretation. We conclude with recommendations for practice.

Read more

9/12/2024

Designing Interactions With Shared AVs in Complex Urban Mobility Scenarios
Total Score

0

Designing Interactions With Shared AVs in Complex Urban Mobility Scenarios

Marius Hoggenmueller, Martin Tomitsch, Stewart Worrall

In this article, we report on the design and evaluation of an external human-machine interface (eHMI) for a real autonomous vehicle (AV), developed to operate as a shared transport pod in a pedestrianized urban space. We present insights about our human-centered design process, which included testing initial concepts through a tangible toolkit and evaluating 360-degree recordings of a staged pick-up scenario in virtual reality. Our results indicate that in complex mobility scenarios, participants filter for critical eHMI messages; further, we found that implicit cues (i.e., pick-up manoeuvre and proximity to the rider) influence participants' experience and trust, while at the same time more explicit interaction modes are desired. This highlights the importance of considering interactions with shared AVs as a service more holistically, in order to develop knowledge about AV-pedestrian interactions in complex mobility scenarios that complements more targeted eHMI evaluations.

Read more

6/19/2024

Voicing Uncertainty: How Speech, Text, and Visualizations Influence Decisions with Data Uncertainty
Total Score

0

Voicing Uncertainty: How Speech, Text, and Visualizations Influence Decisions with Data Uncertainty

Chase Stokes, Chelsea Sanker, Bridget Cogley, Vidya Setlur

Understanding and communicating data uncertainty is crucial for informed decision-making across various domains, including finance, healthcare, and public policy. This study investigates the impact of gender and acoustic variables on decision-making, confidence, and trust through a crowdsourced experiment. We compared visualization-only representations of uncertainty to text-forward and speech-forward bimodal representations, including multiple synthetic voices across gender. Speech-forward representations led to an increase in risky decisions, and text-forward representations led to lower confidence. Contrary to prior work, speech-forward forecasts did not receive higher ratings of trust. Higher normalized pitch led to a slight increase in decision confidence, but other voice characteristics had minimal impact on decisions and trust. An exploratory analysis of accented speech showed consistent results with the main experiment and additionally indicated lower trust ratings for information presented in Indian and Kenyan accents. The results underscore the importance of considering acoustic and contextual factors in presentation of data uncertainty.

Read more

8/19/2024