Development and Evaluation of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation Tool for Creating SAPPhIRE Models of Artificial Systems

Overview

• This research explores using Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate structured descriptions of systems using the SAPPhIRE model of causality.
• SAPPhIRE is a useful framework for supporting design-by-analogy, but creating SAPPhIRE models is a labor-intensive process that requires human experts to gather technical knowledge from multiple sources.
• The paper presents a new Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) tool for automatically generating information related to SAPPhIRE constructs of artificial systems.
• The paper reports results from a preliminary evaluation of the tool's accuracy and reliability.

Plain English Explanation

The SAPPhIRE model of causality is a useful framework for understanding how systems work and supporting design by analogy. However, creating a SAPPhIRE model for an artificial or biological system requires a lot of effort from human experts who have to gather technical knowledge from multiple sources.

This research looks at how we can use Large Language Models (LLMs) to automatically generate structured descriptions of systems using the SAPPhIRE model. The researchers developed a new tool called Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) that can pull relevant information from various sources to create these descriptions.

The paper then reports the results of testing this RAG tool, looking at how accurate and reliable the information it generates is. This is an important first step in seeing if this approach could help make it easier to create SAPPhIRE models without needing as much human effort.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) tool that leverages LLMs to automatically generate information related to the SAPPhIRE constructs (State, Action, Part, Phenomenon, Input, and Effect) for artificial systems.

The RAG tool first retrieves relevant information from a knowledge base using a retrieval model. It then uses a generation model to produce coherent text describing the SAPPhIRE constructs based on the retrieved information.

The researchers conducted a preliminary evaluation of the RAG tool, focusing on the factual accuracy and reliability of the generated outputs. They had human experts assess the tool's performance on a set of artificial systems, rating the accuracy and consistency of the generated descriptions.

The results suggest the RAG tool can produce reasonably accurate and reliable SAPPhIRE descriptions, though there is room for improvement, especially in ensuring the information is complete and consistent across the different SAPPhIRE constructs.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable first step in exploring how LLMs and retrieval-augmented generation techniques can be leveraged to ease the burden of creating SAPPhIRE models. However, the preliminary nature of the evaluation means there are still many open questions and areas for further research:

• The evaluation focused only on a limited set of artificial systems - more comprehensive testing across a wider range of systems is needed to fully assess the tool's capabilities.
• The accuracy and reliability metrics used in the evaluation provide a high-level assessment, but more detailed analysis is required to understand the tool's strengths, weaknesses, and failure modes.
• The paper does not address potential issues around hallucination or bias in the generated outputs, which will be important to investigate further.
• Integrating the RAG tool into a full SAPPhIRE modeling workflow and evaluating its impact on design-by-analogy tasks would provide valuable insights beyond the current system-level evaluation.

Overall, this research demonstrates the potential of leveraging LLMs and retrieval-augmented generation to streamline the SAPPhIRE modeling process, but significant work remains to fully realize the benefits of this approach.

Conclusion

This research presents a new Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) tool that uses LLMs to automatically generate structured descriptions of artificial systems based on the SAPPhIRE model of causality. A preliminary evaluation suggests the tool can produce reasonably accurate and reliable information, but more comprehensive testing and further research is needed to fully understand its capabilities and limitations.

Developing effective tools for creating SAPPhIRE models could significantly reduce the effort required and help make this useful design-by-analogy framework more accessible. The insights from this research represent an important step towards that goal, with the potential to ultimately support more innovative and efficient system design.