Diagnostic Reasoning in Natural Language: Computational Model and Application
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Computational model for diagnostic reasoning in natural language
- Application of the model to a healthcare use case
- Explores how language models can engage in complex reasoning tasks
Plain English Explanation
This paper presents a computational model for diagnostic reasoning in natural language. The researchers developed a system that can take in natural language descriptions of symptoms or medical information and use that to reason about potential diagnoses or treatment recommendations.
The model is designed to mimic the way human doctors engage in diagnostic reasoning - considering multiple possibilities, weighing evidence, and arriving at a conclusion. By applying this kind of sophisticated reasoning to language processing, the researchers aim to create AI systems that can provide helpful medical guidance or analysis.
The paper demonstrates the model's capabilities through a healthcare use case, showing how it can analyze clinical notes and provide diagnostic insights. This suggests that language models can be trained to go beyond simple pattern matching and engage in more complex, nuanced reasoning.
Overall, the work explores how AI can be developed to reason in ways that are more akin to human experts, which could have significant implications for fields like healthcare, where accurate diagnostic reasoning is critical.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes a computational model for diagnostic reasoning in natural language. The model is designed to take in natural language descriptions of symptoms or medical information and use that to reason about potential diagnoses or treatment recommendations.
The core of the model is a neural network-based architecture that can represent and reason about medical concepts, their relationships, and the logical flow of diagnostic reasoning. This allows the model to consider multiple hypotheses, weigh evidence, and arrive at a conclusion, similar to how human doctors engage in diagnostic reasoning.
The researchers demonstrate the model's capabilities through a healthcare use case, where it is used to analyze clinical notes and provide diagnostic insights. This shows how language models can be trained to go beyond simple pattern matching and engage in more complex, nuanced reasoning.
The work explores the potential for AI systems to reason in ways that are more akin to human experts, which could have significant implications for fields like healthcare, where accurate diagnostic reasoning is critical.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to developing AI systems that can engage in sophisticated diagnostic reasoning. However, the researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research.
One key caveat is that the model was trained and evaluated on a relatively narrow set of medical conditions and clinical notes. To be truly useful in real-world healthcare settings, the model would need to be scaled up to handle a much broader range of medical knowledge and scenarios.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or errors that could be introduced by the model's reasoning process. Ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of such systems is crucial, especially in high-stakes domains like medicine.
Further research could also explore ways to make the model's reasoning more transparent and explainable, allowing healthcare professionals to better understand and validate its decision-making process.
Overall, while the work presents an interesting and potentially impactful approach, there are still significant challenges to overcome before such AI-powered diagnostic reasoning systems can be reliably deployed in real-world healthcare settings.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a computational model for diagnostic reasoning in natural language, demonstrating how language models can be trained to engage in complex, nuanced reasoning that mimics human experts.
The researchers show the model's capabilities through a healthcare use case, where it is able to analyze clinical notes and provide diagnostic insights. This suggests that AI systems can be developed to reason in ways that are more akin to human experts, which could have significant implications for fields like healthcare.
While the work presents a promising approach, the researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research, such as scaling the model to a broader range of medical knowledge and ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of the system's reasoning process. Ongoing developments in AI-powered diagnostic reasoning could lead to transformative advancements in healthcare and other high-stakes domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Diagnostic Reasoning in Natural Language: Computational Model and Application
Nils Dycke, Matej Zev{c}evi'c, Ilia Kuznetsov, Beatrix Suess, Kristian Kersting, Iryna Gurevych
Diagnostic reasoning is a key component of expert work in many domains. It is a hard, time-consuming activity that requires expertise, and AI research has investigated the ways automated systems can support this process. Yet, due to the complexity of natural language, the applications of AI for diagnostic reasoning to language-related tasks are lacking. To close this gap, we investigate diagnostic abductive reasoning (DAR) in the context of language-grounded tasks (NL-DAR). We propose a novel modeling framework for NL-DAR based on Pearl's structural causal models and instantiate it in a comprehensive study of scientific paper assessment in the biomedical domain. We use the resulting dataset to investigate the human decision-making process in NL-DAR and determine the potential of LLMs to support structured decision-making over text. Our framework, open resources and tools lay the groundwork for the empirical study of collaborative diagnostic reasoning in the age of LLMs, in the scholarly domain and beyond.
Read more9/10/2024
0
Large Language Models are Clinical Reasoners: Reasoning-Aware Diagnosis Framework with Prompt-Generated Rationales
Taeyoon Kwon, Kai Tzu-iunn Ong, Dongjin Kang, Seungjun Moon, Jeong Ryong Lee, Dosik Hwang, Yongsik Sim, Beomseok Sohn, Dongha Lee, Jinyoung Yeo
Machine reasoning has made great progress in recent years owing to large language models (LLMs). In the clinical domain, however, most NLP-driven projects mainly focus on clinical classification or reading comprehension, and under-explore clinical reasoning for disease diagnosis due to the expensive rationale annotation with clinicians. In this work, we present a reasoning-aware diagnosis framework that rationalizes the diagnostic process via prompt-based learning in a time- and labor-efficient manner, and learns to reason over the prompt-generated rationales. Specifically, we address the clinical reasoning for disease diagnosis, where the LLM generates diagnostic rationales providing its insight on presented patient data and the reasoning path towards the diagnosis, namely Clinical Chain-of-Thought (Clinical CoT). We empirically demonstrate LLMs/LMs' ability of clinical reasoning via extensive experiments and analyses on both rationale generation and disease diagnosis in various settings. We further propose a novel set of criteria for evaluating machine-generated rationales' potential for real-world clinical settings, facilitating and benefiting future research in this area.
Read more5/13/2024
0
DiReCT: Diagnostic Reasoning for Clinical Notes via Large Language Models
Bowen Wang, Jiuyang Chang, Yiming Qian, Guoxin Chen, Junhao Chen, Zhouqiang Jiang, Jiahao Zhang, Yuta Nakashima, Hajime Nagahara
Large language models (LLMs) have recently showcased remarkable capabilities, spanning a wide range of tasks and applications, including those in the medical domain. Models like GPT-4 excel in medical question answering but may face challenges in the lack of interpretability when handling complex tasks in real clinical settings. We thus introduce the diagnostic reasoning dataset for clinical notes (DiReCT), aiming at evaluating the reasoning ability and interpretability of LLMs compared to human doctors. It contains 511 clinical notes, each meticulously annotated by physicians, detailing the diagnostic reasoning process from observations in a clinical note to the final diagnosis. Additionally, a diagnostic knowledge graph is provided to offer essential knowledge for reasoning, which may not be covered in the training data of existing LLMs. Evaluations of leading LLMs on DiReCT bring out a significant gap between their reasoning ability and that of human doctors, highlighting the critical need for models that can reason effectively in real-world clinical scenarios.
Read more8/7/2024
0
Reliable Reasoning Beyond Natural Language
Nasim Borazjanizadeh, Steven T. Piantadosi
Despite their linguistic competence, Large Language models (LLMs) often exhibit limitations in their ability to reason reliably and flexibly. To address this, we propose a neurosymbolic approach that prompts LLMs to extract and encode all relevant information from a problem statement as logical code statements, and then use a logic programming language (Prolog) to conduct the iterative computations of explicit deductive reasoning. Our approach significantly enhances the performance of LLMs on the standard mathematical reasoning benchmark, GSM8k, and the Navigate dataset from the BIG-bench dataset. Additionally, we introduce a novel dataset, the Non-Linear Reasoning (NLR) dataset, consisting of 55 unique word problems that target the shortcomings of the next token prediction paradigm of LLMs and require complex non-linear reasoning but only basic arithmetic skills to solve. Our findings demonstrate that the integration of Prolog enables LLMs to achieve high performance on the NLR dataset, which even the most advanced language models (including GPT4) fail to solve using text only.
Read more7/23/2024