Do Large Language Models Have Compositional Ability? An Investigation into Limitations and Scalability

Read original: arXiv:2407.15720 - Published 8/13/2024 by Zhuoyan Xu, Zhenmei Shi, Yingyu Liang
Total Score

0

Do Large Language Models Have Compositional Ability? An Investigation into Limitations and Scalability

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper investigates the compositional ability of large language models (LLMs) and their scalability.
  • Compositional ability refers to the capacity of models to understand and generate complex language by combining simpler building blocks.
  • The study examines the limitations of LLMs in terms of their compositional understanding and provides insights into how their performance scales with model size.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers wanted to understand how well large language models (LLMs) can handle complex language and concepts by combining simpler building blocks. This ability, known as compositional ability, is important for models to be able to understand and generate complex language.

The study looked at the limitations of LLMs when it comes to compositional understanding, and how their performance changes as the models get larger and more complex. This helps us understand the scalability of these models and where their strengths and weaknesses lie.

The findings provide insights into the compositional capabilities of LLMs and how they can be improved to better understand and generate complex language. This is an important area of research as these models become more widely used in language-based applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the compositional ability of large language models (LLMs) and how their performance scales as the models become larger and more complex. Compositional ability refers to the capacity of models to understand and generate complex language by combining simpler building blocks, such as words and phrases.

The researchers designed a series of experiments to test the compositional understanding of LLMs. This included evaluating the models' ability to handle nested structures, interpret metaphors, and reason about abstract concepts. The findings suggest that while LLMs exhibit some compositional abilities, they also face significant limitations in this area.

The paper also explores how the scalability of LLMs affects their compositional understanding. The results indicate that as models become larger, their performance on compositional tasks may not improve proportionally, and they may even exhibit diminishing returns.

The implications of these findings are important for the development of more compositionally-capable language models that can better understand and generate complex language. The insights from this research can inform future model architectures and training approaches to address the limitations identified in the study.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-designed investigation into the compositional abilities of large language models. The experimental setup and analysis are robust, and the findings offer valuable insights into the current limitations of these models.

One potential limitation of the study is the specific set of tasks and evaluation metrics used to assess compositional understanding. While the researchers have made a strong effort to capture different aspects of compositionality, there may be other facets or benchmarks that could provide additional insights.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying causes of the observed compositional deficiencies in LLMs. Further research could explore the architectural choices, training data, or other factors that contribute to these limitations and inform strategies for improving compositional ability.

The findings regarding the scalability of LLMs are particularly thought-provoking. The diminishing returns in compositional performance as models grow larger suggest that simply scaling up these models may not be sufficient to overcome their compositional limitations. Exploring alternative approaches, such as hybrid architectures or targeted training regimes, could be a fruitful area for future research.

Conclusion

This paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of the compositional abilities of large language models and their scalability. The findings highlight the current limitations of these models in handling complex language and compositionality, and suggest that simply increasing model size may not be a panacea.

The insights from this research can inform the development of more compositionally-capable language models that can better understand and generate complex language. This is an important step towards building AI systems that can more effectively engage with language-based applications and interact with the world in a more natural and intuitive way.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Do Large Language Models Have Compositional Ability? An Investigation into Limitations and Scalability
Total Score

0

Do Large Language Models Have Compositional Ability? An Investigation into Limitations and Scalability

Zhuoyan Xu, Zhenmei Shi, Yingyu Liang

Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for many AI problems and exhibit remarkable in-context learning (ICL) capabilities. Compositional ability, solving unseen complex tasks that combine two or more simple tasks, is an essential reasoning ability for Artificial General Intelligence. Despite the tremendous success of LLMs, how they approach composite tasks, especially those not encountered during the pretraining phase, remains an open and largely underexplored question. In this study, we delve into the ICL capabilities of LLMs on composite tasks, with only simple tasks as in-context examples. We develop a test suite of composite tasks including linguistic and logical challenges and perform empirical studies across different LLM families. We observe that models exhibit divergent behaviors: (1) For simpler composite tasks that apply distinct mapping mechanisms to different input segments, the models demonstrate decent compositional ability, while scaling up the model enhances this ability; (2) for more complex composite tasks involving reasoning multiple steps, where each step represents one task, models typically underperform, and scaling up generally provides no improvements. We offer theoretical analysis in a simplified setting, explaining that models exhibit compositional capability when the task handles different input parts separately. We believe our work sheds new light on the capabilities of LLMs in solving composite tasks regarding the nature of the tasks and model scale. Our dataset and code are available at {url{https://github.com/OliverXUZY/LLM_Compose}}.

Read more

8/13/2024

From Words to Worlds: Compositionality for Cognitive Architectures
Total Score

0

From Words to Worlds: Compositionality for Cognitive Architectures

Ruchira Dhar, Anders S{o}gaard

Large language models (LLMs) are very performant connectionist systems, but do they exhibit more compositionality? More importantly, is that part of why they perform so well? We present empirical analyses across four LLM families (12 models) and three task categories, including a novel task introduced below. Our findings reveal a nuanced relationship in learning of compositional strategies by LLMs -- while scaling enhances compositional abilities, instruction tuning often has a reverse effect. Such disparity brings forth some open issues regarding the development and improvement of large language models in alignment with human cognitive capacities.

Read more

7/19/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Exploring the Compositional Deficiency of Large Language Models in Mathematical Reasoning

Jun Zhao, Jingqi Tong, Yurong Mou, Ming Zhang, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang

Human cognition exhibits systematic compositionality, the algebraic ability to generate infinite novel combinations from finite learned components, which is the key to understanding and reasoning about complex logic. In this work, we investigate the compositionality of large language models (LLMs) in mathematical reasoning. Specifically, we construct a new dataset textsc{MathTrap}footnotemark[3] by introducing carefully designed logical traps into the problem descriptions of MATH and GSM8k. Since problems with logical flaws are quite rare in the real world, these represent ``unseen'' cases to LLMs. Solving these requires the models to systematically compose (1) the mathematical knowledge involved in the original problems with (2) knowledge related to the introduced traps. Our experiments show that while LLMs possess both components of requisite knowledge, they do not textbf{spontaneously} combine them to handle these novel cases. We explore several methods to mitigate this deficiency, such as natural language prompts, few-shot demonstrations, and fine-tuning. We find that LLMs' performance can be textbf{passively} improved through the above external intervention. Overall, systematic compositionality remains an open challenge for large language models.

Read more

7/15/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Towards Compositionally Generalizable Semantic Parsing in Large Language Models: A Survey

Amogh Mannekote

Compositional generalization is the ability of a model to generalize to complex, previously unseen types of combinations of entities from just having seen the primitives. This type of generalization is particularly relevant to the semantic parsing community for applications such as task-oriented dialogue, text-to-SQL parsing, and information retrieval, as they can harbor infinite complexity. Despite the success of large language models (LLMs) in a wide range of NLP tasks, unlocking perfect compositional generalization still remains one of the few last unsolved frontiers. The past few years has seen a surge of interest in works that explore the limitations of, methods to improve, and evaluation metrics for compositional generalization capabilities of LLMs for semantic parsing tasks. In this work, we present a literature survey geared at synthesizing recent advances in analysis, methods, and evaluation schemes to offer a starting point for both practitioners and researchers in this area.

Read more

4/23/2024