From Words to Worlds: Compositionality for Cognitive Architectures
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the concept of compositionality, which is the ability of language to combine smaller units (like words) into larger meaningful structures (like sentences and paragraphs).
- The researchers investigate how well large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT are able to handle compositional reasoning.
- They develop new evaluation tasks and metrics to assess the compositional abilities of LLMs, and identify some key limitations in current models.
- The findings have implications for the development of more sophisticated cognitive architectures that can reason about language and the world in a more human-like way.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at the ability of large language models (LLMs) to understand how the meaning of words and phrases can be combined in complex ways. This idea, called compositionality, is a key part of how humans use language to convey rich meanings.
The researchers created new tests to measure how well LLMs like ChatGPT can handle compositional reasoning. For example, they might ask the model to interpret a sentence like "The big red ball is on the small blue table."
The results suggest that while LLMs are impressive at many language tasks, they still have significant limitations when it comes to compositionality. The models sometimes struggle to fully grasp how the individual words and phrases interact to create the overall meaning.
This is an important finding because developing AI systems with more sophisticated cognitive architectures that can reason about language and the world in a more human-like way is a key goal for the field. The insights from this research could help guide the development of future AI models with stronger compositional abilities.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes new methods for measuring the compositionality of large language models (LLMs). Compositionality refers to the ability to combine smaller linguistic units (like words) into larger meaningful structures (like sentences and paragraphs).
The researchers developed a suite of novel evaluation tasks designed to probe the compositional reasoning capabilities of LLMs. These included tasks like interpreting modified noun phrases, understanding negated statements, and reasoning about spatial relationships.
By applying these new evaluation metrics across a range of LLMs, including GPT-3 and GPT-J, the authors found that while the models performed well on many standard language tasks, they exhibited significant compositional deficiencies. The models struggled to fully capture the interactions between individual linguistic elements and how they contribute to overall meaning.
These findings have important implications for the development of more sophisticated cognitive architectures that can reason about language and the world in a more human-like way. The insights from this research could help guide future efforts to build AI systems with stronger compositional abilities.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around the compositional abilities of large language models. The authors' novel evaluation tasks offer a more nuanced way to assess how well these models can handle the complex interplay of linguistic elements.
However, the paper also acknowledges some limitations of the current study. For example, the tasks were limited to the English language, and it's unclear how the findings would generalize to other languages or modalities. Additionally, the specific architectures and training regimes of the models tested may have influenced the observed compositional deficiencies.
Further research is needed to better understand the relationship between model architecture, training data, and compositional reasoning abilities. Exploring transfer learning approaches or incorporating more structured representations of knowledge may be promising directions for improving the compositional capacities of future AI systems.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in evaluating the language comprehension abilities of AI systems and identifying key areas for improvement. By continuing to push the boundaries of what language models can do, researchers can work towards the development of more advanced cognitive architectures that can reason about language and the world in ways that more closely resemble human cognition.
Conclusion
This paper takes a close look at the compositionality of large language models, exploring their ability to understand how the meaning of words and phrases can be combined in complex ways.
The researchers developed novel evaluation tasks to assess the compositional reasoning capabilities of LLMs, and found that while these models excel at many language-related tasks, they still struggle with fully capturing the interplay of linguistic elements and how they contribute to overall meaning.
These findings have important implications for the development of more sophisticated cognitive architectures that can reason about language and the world in a more human-like way. By continuing to study the compositional abilities of AI systems, researchers can work towards building models with stronger language understanding and reasoning capabilities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
From Words to Worlds: Compositionality for Cognitive Architectures
Ruchira Dhar, Anders S{o}gaard
Large language models (LLMs) are very performant connectionist systems, but do they exhibit more compositionality? More importantly, is that part of why they perform so well? We present empirical analyses across four LLM families (12 models) and three task categories, including a novel task introduced below. Our findings reveal a nuanced relationship in learning of compositional strategies by LLMs -- while scaling enhances compositional abilities, instruction tuning often has a reverse effect. Such disparity brings forth some open issues regarding the development and improvement of large language models in alignment with human cognitive capacities.
Read more7/19/2024
0
Do Large Language Models Have Compositional Ability? An Investigation into Limitations and Scalability
Zhuoyan Xu, Zhenmei Shi, Yingyu Liang
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for many AI problems and exhibit remarkable in-context learning (ICL) capabilities. Compositional ability, solving unseen complex tasks that combine two or more simple tasks, is an essential reasoning ability for Artificial General Intelligence. Despite the tremendous success of LLMs, how they approach composite tasks, especially those not encountered during the pretraining phase, remains an open and largely underexplored question. In this study, we delve into the ICL capabilities of LLMs on composite tasks, with only simple tasks as in-context examples. We develop a test suite of composite tasks including linguistic and logical challenges and perform empirical studies across different LLM families. We observe that models exhibit divergent behaviors: (1) For simpler composite tasks that apply distinct mapping mechanisms to different input segments, the models demonstrate decent compositional ability, while scaling up the model enhances this ability; (2) for more complex composite tasks involving reasoning multiple steps, where each step represents one task, models typically underperform, and scaling up generally provides no improvements. We offer theoretical analysis in a simplified setting, explaining that models exhibit compositional capability when the task handles different input parts separately. We believe our work sheds new light on the capabilities of LLMs in solving composite tasks regarding the nature of the tasks and model scale. Our dataset and code are available at {url{https://github.com/OliverXUZY/LLM_Compose}}.
Read more8/13/2024
0
From Frege to chatGPT: Compositionality in language, cognition, and deep neural networks
Jacob Russin, Sam Whitman McGrath, Danielle J. Williams, Lotem Elber-Dorozko
Compositionality has long been considered a key explanatory property underlying human intelligence: arbitrary concepts can be composed into novel complex combinations, permitting the acquisition of an open ended, potentially infinite expressive capacity from finite learning experiences. Influential arguments have held that neural networks fail to explain this aspect of behavior, leading many to dismiss them as viable models of human cognition. Over the last decade, however, modern deep neural networks (DNNs), which share the same fundamental design principles as their predecessors, have come to dominate artificial intelligence, exhibiting the most advanced cognitive behaviors ever demonstrated in machines. In particular, large language models (LLMs), DNNs trained to predict the next word on a large corpus of text, have proven capable of sophisticated behaviors such as writing syntactically complex sentences without grammatical errors, producing cogent chains of reasoning, and even writing original computer programs -- all behaviors thought to require compositional processing. In this chapter, we survey recent empirical work from machine learning for a broad audience in philosophy, cognitive science, and neuroscience, situating recent breakthroughs within the broader context of philosophical arguments about compositionality. In particular, our review emphasizes two approaches to endowing neural networks with compositional generalization capabilities: (1) architectural inductive biases, and (2) metalearning, or learning to learn. We also present findings suggesting that LLM pretraining can be understood as a kind of metalearning, and can thereby equip DNNs with compositional generalization abilities in a similar way. We conclude by discussing the implications that these findings may have for the study of compositionality in human cognition and by suggesting avenues for future research.
Read more5/27/2024
💬
0
Exploring the Compositional Deficiency of Large Language Models in Mathematical Reasoning
Jun Zhao, Jingqi Tong, Yurong Mou, Ming Zhang, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
Human cognition exhibits systematic compositionality, the algebraic ability to generate infinite novel combinations from finite learned components, which is the key to understanding and reasoning about complex logic. In this work, we investigate the compositionality of large language models (LLMs) in mathematical reasoning. Specifically, we construct a new dataset textsc{MathTrap}footnotemark[3] by introducing carefully designed logical traps into the problem descriptions of MATH and GSM8k. Since problems with logical flaws are quite rare in the real world, these represent ``unseen'' cases to LLMs. Solving these requires the models to systematically compose (1) the mathematical knowledge involved in the original problems with (2) knowledge related to the introduced traps. Our experiments show that while LLMs possess both components of requisite knowledge, they do not textbf{spontaneously} combine them to handle these novel cases. We explore several methods to mitigate this deficiency, such as natural language prompts, few-shot demonstrations, and fine-tuning. We find that LLMs' performance can be textbf{passively} improved through the above external intervention. Overall, systematic compositionality remains an open challenge for large language models.
Read more7/15/2024