Do More Details Always Introduce More Hallucinations in LVLM-based Image Captioning?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the relationship between the level of detail in image captions generated by large vision-language models (LVLMs) and the prevalence of hallucinations or fabricated content in those captions.
- The researchers conducted experiments to investigate whether adding more details to captions always leads to more hallucinations, or if there are ways to mitigate this issue.
- The findings suggest that the relationship between caption detail and hallucination is more nuanced than a simple "more details, more hallucinations" rule, and that certain techniques may help reduce hallucinations while maintaining detailed captions.
Plain English Explanation
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate detailed captions to describe images. However, these models sometimes "hallucinate" - they produce information that is not actually present in the image. The researchers behind this paper wanted to understand if there is a direct relationship between the level of detail in the captions and the amount of hallucination.
In other words, do LVLMs always produce more hallucinations when they try to generate more detailed captions? Or is there a way to maintain a high level of detail in the captions without necessarily introducing more hallucinations?
The researchers conducted experiments to explore this issue. They found that the relationship between caption detail and hallucination is more complex than a simple one-to-one correlation. Certain techniques, such as linking to relevant research on mitigating hallucinations, may help reduce hallucinations while still allowing for detailed captions.
This is an important finding, as it suggests that LVLMs can potentially generate high-quality, detailed image descriptions without necessarily introducing more fabricated content. This could have implications for a wide range of applications, from automated image captioning to AI-generated narratives.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted experiments to investigate the relationship between the level of detail in image captions generated by LVLMs and the prevalence of hallucinated content in those captions. They used several state-of-the-art LVLM models, including Seeing is Believing and VDGD, and evaluated the captions produced on a range of image datasets.
The results showed that the relationship between caption detail and hallucination is more nuanced than a simple "more details, more hallucinations" rule. Certain techniques, such as using cognitive prompts or applying hallucination mitigation strategies, were able to maintain a high level of detail in the captions while reducing the amount of fabricated content.
The researchers also explored the factors that contribute to hallucination in LVLMs and discussed potential approaches for alleviating hallucinations in these models.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that their study has limitations, such as the use of a relatively small set of LVLM models and image datasets. Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying mechanisms that drive the relationship between caption detail and hallucination.
One potential concern is that the techniques used to mitigate hallucinations, such as cognitive prompts, may not be generalizable or easy to implement in real-world applications. Further research is needed to explore more scalable and robust methods for reducing hallucinations in LVLM-based image captioning systems.
It would also be valuable to investigate the impact of hallucinations on the perceived quality and trustworthiness of LVLM-generated captions, as well as the downstream effects on applications that rely on these captions.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to the understanding of hallucination in LVLM-based image captioning systems. The findings suggest that the relationship between caption detail and hallucination is more complex than a simple linear correlation, and that there are techniques that can be used to mitigate hallucinations while preserving detailed captions.
These insights have the potential to inform the development of more reliable and trustworthy LVLM-based image captioning systems, which could have significant implications for a wide range of applications, from automated image description to AI-generated narratives. However, further research is needed to fully explore the underlying mechanisms and develop more scalable solutions for addressing hallucinations in these models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Do More Details Always Introduce More Hallucinations in LVLM-based Image Captioning?
Mingqian Feng, Yunlong Tang, Zeliang Zhang, Chenliang Xu
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) excel in integrating visual and linguistic contexts to produce detailed content, facilitating applications such as image captioning. However, using LVLMs to generate descriptions often faces the challenge of object hallucination (OH), where the output text misrepresents actual objects in the input image. While previous studies attribute the occurrence of OH to the inclusion of more details, our study finds technical flaws in existing metrics, leading to unreliable evaluations of models and conclusions about OH. This has sparked a debate on the question: Do more details always introduce more hallucinations in LVLM-based image captioning? In this paper, we address this debate by proposing a novel decoding strategy, Differentiated Beam Decoding (DBD), along with a reliable new set of evaluation metrics: CLIP-Precision, CLIP-Recall, and CLIP-F1. DBD decodes the wealth of information hidden in visual input into distinct language representations called unit facts in parallel. This decoding is achieved via a well-designed differential score that guides the parallel search and candidate screening. The selected unit facts are then aggregated to generate the final caption. Our proposed metrics evaluate the comprehensiveness and accuracy of image captions by comparing the embedding groups of ground-truth image regions and generated text partitions. Extensive experiments on the Visual Genome dataset validate the effectiveness of our approach, demonstrating that it produces detailed descriptions while maintaining low hallucination levels.
Read more6/19/2024
0
Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) via Language-Contrastive Decoding (LCD)
Avshalom Manevich, Reut Tsarfaty
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are an extension of Large Language Models (LLMs) that facilitate processing both image and text inputs, expanding AI capabilities. However, LVLMs struggle with object hallucinations due to their reliance on text cues and learned object co-occurrence biases. While most research quantifies these hallucinations, mitigation strategies are still lacking. Our study introduces a Language Contrastive Decoding (LCD) algorithm that adjusts LVLM outputs based on LLM distribution confidence levels, effectively reducing object hallucinations. We demonstrate the advantages of LCD in leading LVLMs, showing up to %4 improvement in POPE F1 scores and up to %36 reduction in CHAIR scores on the COCO validation set, while also improving captioning quality scores. Our method effectively improves LVLMs without needing complex post-processing or retraining, and is easily applicable to different models. Our findings highlight the potential of further exploration of LVLM-specific decoding algorithms.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Instruction Contrastive Decoding
Xintong Wang, Jingheng Pan, Liang Ding, Chris Biemann
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are increasingly adept at generating contextually detailed and coherent responses from visual inputs. However, their application in multimodal decision-making and open-ended generation is hindered by a notable rate of hallucinations, where generated text inaccurately represents the visual contents. To address this issue, this paper introduces the Instruction Contrastive Decoding (ICD) method, a novel approach designed to reduce hallucinations during LVLM inference. Our method is inspired by our observation that what we call disturbance instructions significantly exacerbate hallucinations in multimodal fusion modules. ICD contrasts distributions from standard and instruction disturbance, thereby increasing alignment uncertainty and effectively subtracting hallucinated concepts from the original distribution. Through comprehensive experiments on discriminative benchmarks (POPE and MME) and a generative benchmark (LLaVa-Bench), we demonstrate that ICD significantly mitigates both object-level and attribute-level hallucinations. Moreover, our method not only addresses hallucinations but also significantly enhances the general perception and recognition capabilities of LVLMs.
Read more6/6/2024
0
VDGD: Mitigating LVLM Hallucinations in Cognitive Prompts by Bridging the Visual Perception Gap
Sreyan Ghosh, Chandra Kiran Reddy Evuru, Sonal Kumar, Utkarsh Tyagi, Oriol Nieto, Zeyu Jin, Dinesh Manocha
Recent interest in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) for practical applications is moderated by the significant challenge of hallucination or the inconsistency between the factual information and the generated text. In this paper, we first perform an in-depth analysis of hallucinations and discover several novel insights about how and when LVLMs hallucinate. From our analysis, we show that: (1) The community's efforts have been primarily targeted towards reducing hallucinations related to visual recognition (VR) prompts (e.g., prompts that only require describing the image), thereby ignoring hallucinations for cognitive prompts (e.g., prompts that require additional skills like reasoning on contents of the image). (2) LVLMs lack visual perception, i.e., they can see but not necessarily understand or perceive the input image. We analyze responses to cognitive prompts and show that LVLMs hallucinate due to a perception gap: although LVLMs accurately recognize visual elements in the input image and possess sufficient cognitive skills, they struggle to respond accurately and hallucinate. To overcome this shortcoming, we propose Visual Description Grounded Decoding (VDGD), a simple, robust, and training-free method for alleviating hallucinations. Specifically, we first describe the image and add it as a prefix to the instruction. Next, during auto-regressive decoding, we sample from the plausible candidates according to their KL-Divergence (KLD) to the description, where lower KLD is given higher preference. Experimental results on several benchmarks and LVLMs show that VDGD improves significantly over other baselines in reducing hallucinations. We also propose VaLLu, a benchmark for the comprehensive evaluation of the cognitive capabilities of LVLMs.
Read more5/27/2024