Do Recommender Systems Promote Local Music? A Reproducibility Study Using Music Streaming Data
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines whether music recommender systems promote local music or lead to the dominance of global hits.
- It presents a reproducibility study using music streaming data to investigate this question.
- The study finds that recommender systems can indeed promote local music, but only to a limited extent, and that global hits still dominate.
Plain English Explanation
Music recommender systems are algorithms that suggest new songs or artists to listeners based on their past listening history and preferences. The researchers in this study wanted to understand whether these recommender systems help promote local or regional music, or if they instead lead to the domination of global chart-topping hits.
To investigate this, the researchers analyzed data from music streaming platforms. They looked at things like what music listeners were actually listening to, how the recommender systems were influencing their choices, and whether local artists were getting more attention as a result.
The key finding was that while recommender systems can nudge listeners towards more local or regional music to some degree, the global hits still end up being the most popular overall. The researchers concluded that recommender systems have a limited ability to truly elevate local music against the powerful forces driving the success of major international artists.
This is an important topic because there are concerns that music recommender systems, like many other AI-powered algorithms, may be inadvertently contributing to a "winner-take-all" dynamic where a small number of mega-hits dominate the market at the expense of more diverse and locally-relevant music. The researchers' work provides valuable insights into the nuances of this issue.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a reproducibility study using music streaming data to examine the impact of music recommender systems on the promotion of local music. They analyzed data from major music streaming platforms, including user listening histories, artist metadata, and the recommendations provided to users.
The key elements of their study design and analysis included:
- Mapping local vs. global artists: The researchers developed a method to classify artists as either "local" (from the user's home country) or "global" based on their geographic origins and popularity.
- Measuring recommendation exposure: They quantified the degree to which local and global artists were featured in the recommender system's suggestions to users.
- Analyzing listening behavior: The researchers looked at how users' music consumption patterns changed in response to the recommendations they received.
The study found that while recommender systems do promote local music to some extent, global hits still account for the majority of listening. The researchers suggest that the limited ability of recommender systems to truly elevate local music is due to the powerful network effects and marketing budgets of major international artists.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations and caveats in their work. For example, their classification of local vs. global artists may not fully capture the nuances of musical geography, and their data sources may not be representative of the entire music streaming landscape.
Additionally, the researchers do not delve deeply into potential biases or fairness issues that may be inherent in the recommender systems they studied. There are concerns that such algorithms can reinforce existing inequalities and make it difficult for emerging or marginalized artists to break through.
Further research could explore more sophisticated methods for modeling the complex dynamics between local, regional, and global music, as well as investigating the role of platform design, content moderation, and other factors in shaping music consumption patterns. Examining these issues from a multidisciplinary perspective, incorporating insights from music studies, cultural economics, and algorithmic fairness, could yield valuable insights.
Conclusion
This study provides a valuable empirical examination of the interplay between music recommender systems and the promotion of local music. While the researchers found that recommender systems can have a positive impact, global hits continue to dominate, highlighting the limitations of these algorithms in truly diversifying music consumption.
The findings underscore the need for ongoing scrutiny and improvement of recommender systems to ensure they foster a more equitable and vibrant musical ecosystem. As AI-powered personalization becomes increasingly ubiquitous, understanding and addressing its implications for cultural expression and diversity will be crucial.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Do Recommender Systems Promote Local Music? A Reproducibility Study Using Music Streaming Data
Kristina Matrosova, Lilian Marey, Guillaume Salha-Galvan, Thomas Louail, Olivier Bodini, Manuel Moussallam
This paper examines the influence of recommender systems on local music representation, discussing prior findings from an empirical study on the LFM-2b public dataset. This prior study argued that different recommender systems exhibit algorithmic biases shifting music consumption either towards or against local content. However, LFM-2b users do not reflect the diverse audience of music streaming services. To assess the robustness of this study's conclusions, we conduct a comparative analysis using proprietary listening data from a global music streaming service, which we publicly release alongside this paper. We observe significant differences in local music consumption patterns between our dataset and LFM-2b, suggesting that caution should be exercised when drawing conclusions on local music based solely on LFM-2b. Moreover, we show that the algorithmic biases exhibited in the original work vary in our dataset, and that several unexplored model parameters can significantly influence these biases and affect the study's conclusion on both datasets. Finally, we discuss the complexity of accurately labeling local music, emphasizing the risk of misleading conclusions due to unreliable, biased, or incomplete labels. To encourage further research and ensure reproducibility, we have publicly shared our dataset and code.
Read more8/30/2024
0
Oh, Behave! Country Representation Dynamics Created by Feedback Loops in Music Recommender Systems
Oleg Lesota, Jonas Geiger, Max Walder, Dominik Kowald, Markus Schedl
Recent work suggests that music recommender systems are prone to disproportionally frequent recommendations of music from countries more prominently represented in the training data, notably the US. However, it remains unclear to what extent feedback loops in music recommendation influence the dynamics of such imbalance. In this work, we investigate the dynamics of representation of local (i.e., country-specific) and US-produced music in user profiles and recommendations. To this end, we conduct a feedback loop simulation study using the standardized LFM-2b dataset. The results suggest that most of the investigated recommendation models decrease the proportion of music from local artists in their recommendations. Furthermore, we find that models preserving average proportions of US and local music do not necessarily provide country-calibrated recommendations. We also look into popularity calibration and, surprisingly, find that the most popularity-calibrated model in our study (ItemKNN) provides the least country-calibrated recommendations. In addition, users from less represented countries (e.g., Finland) are, in the long term, most affected by the under-representation of their local music in recommendations.
Read more8/22/2024
0
Advancing Cultural Inclusivity: Optimizing Embedding Spaces for Balanced Music Recommendations
Armin Moradi, Nicola Neophytou, Golnoosh Farnadi
Popularity bias in music recommendation systems -- where artists and tracks with the highest listen counts are recommended more often -- can also propagate biases along demographic and cultural axes. In this work, we identify these biases in recommendations for artists from underrepresented cultural groups in prototype-based matrix factorization methods. Unlike traditional matrix factorization methods, prototype-based approaches are interpretable. This allows us to directly link the observed bias in recommendations for minority artists (the effect) to specific properties of the embedding space (the cause). We mitigate popularity bias in music recommendation through capturing both users' and songs' cultural nuances in the embedding space. To address these challenges while maintaining recommendation quality, we propose two novel enhancements to the embedding space: i) we propose an approach to filter-out the irrelevant prototypes used to represent each user and item to improve generalizability, and ii) we introduce regularization techniques to reinforce a more uniform distribution of prototypes within the embedding space. Our results demonstrate significant improvements in reducing popularity bias and enhancing demographic and cultural fairness in music recommendations while achieving competitive -- if not better -- overall performance.
Read more5/29/2024
0
Algorithmic Collective Action in Recommender Systems: Promoting Songs by Reordering Playlists
Joachim Baumann, Celestine Mendler-Dunner
We investigate algorithmic collective action in transformer-based recommender systems. Our use case is a collective of fans aiming to promote the visibility of an artist by strategically placing one of their songs in the existing playlists they control. The success of the collective is measured by the increase in test-time recommendations of the targeted song. We introduce two easily implementable strategies towards this goal and test their efficacy on a publicly available recommender system model released by a major music streaming platform. Our findings reveal that even small collectives (controlling less than 0.01% of the training data) can achieve up 25x amplification of recommendations by strategically choosing the position at which to insert the song. We then focus on investigating the externalities of the strategy. We find that the performance loss for the platform is negligible, and the recommendations of other songs are largely preserved, minimally impairing the user experience of participants. Moreover, the costs are evenly distributed among other artists. Taken together, our findings demonstrate how collective action strategies can be effective while not necessarily being adversarial, raising new questions around incentives, social dynamics, and equilibria in recommender systems.
Read more4/9/2024