Does Data-Efficient Generalization Exacerbate Bias in Foundation Models?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines whether data-efficient generalization in foundation models can exacerbate bias
- Highlights the importance of understanding and mitigating bias in powerful AI systems
- Provides a technical analysis and critical assessment of the research
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores a potential downside of making AI models more "data-efficient" - the ability to learn from smaller amounts of training data. While this can make models more practical and accessible, the researchers investigate whether it could also amplify undesirable biases present in the training data.
Foundation models are large, general-purpose AI systems that can be adapted for a variety of tasks. As these models become increasingly powerful and widely used, it's crucial to understand how they may perpetuate societal biases, such as those related to gender or race.
The research examines whether techniques that allow these models to learn from less data - known as "data-efficient generalization" - could actually worsen these biases by amplifying the influence of the limited training data. By understanding this potential tradeoff, the researchers hope to inform the development of more equitable and responsible AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the relationship between data-efficient generalization and bias in foundation models. The researchers conducted experiments using the GPT-3 language model, evaluating its performance on various tasks related to gender and racial stereotypes.
They compared the model's behavior when trained on a large, diverse dataset (Common Crawl) versus a smaller, more biased dataset (PubMed). The results suggest that while data-efficient generalization can improve the model's overall performance, it may also amplify existing biases present in the limited training data.
For example, the model exhibited stronger gender stereotypes when trained on the smaller PubMed dataset, compared to the more balanced Common Crawl dataset. This indicates that techniques designed to improve data efficiency could inadvertently exacerbate problematic biases in the resulting AI systems.
The researchers also explored potential mitigation strategies, such as data augmentation and adversarial debiasing, which aim to reduce the impact of biases during the training process. These approaches show promise, but the authors acknowledge that further research is needed to fully understand and address the complex interplay between data-efficient generalization and bias in foundation models.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important concerns about the potential unintended consequences of data-efficient generalization in foundation models. While increasing data efficiency can make these powerful AI systems more accessible and practical, the researchers demonstrate that it may also amplify existing societal biases present in the training data.
One limitation of the study is that it focuses primarily on language models and tasks related to gender and racial stereotypes. It would be valuable to examine the impact of data-efficient generalization on foundation models applied to other domains, such as computer vision or geospatial analysis, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of this issue.
Additionally, the researchers suggest exploring mitigation strategies, but more work is needed to develop robust and effective debiasing techniques that can be seamlessly integrated into the training and fine-tuning of foundation models. Techniques like text-guided adaptation may offer promising avenues for future research in this area.
Overall, this paper serves as an important reminder that the pursuit of data-efficient AI must be balanced with a strong commitment to fairness and ethical considerations. As foundation models become more prevalent, it is crucial that the research community continues to investigate and address the complex relationship between model performance and societal biases.
Conclusion
The paper highlights a concerning tradeoff between data-efficient generalization and bias amplification in foundation models. While improving data efficiency can enhance the practicality and accessibility of these powerful AI systems, the research shows that it may also exacerbate existing societal biases present in the training data.
This finding underscores the importance of holistically evaluating the development of advanced AI models, considering not just their technical capabilities but also their potential to perpetuate harmful stereotypes and inequities. As the use of foundation models continues to grow, it will be crucial for the research community to prioritize the development of robust debiasing strategies and a deeper understanding of the complex relationship between model performance and bias.
By addressing these issues proactively, the AI community can work towards creating more equitable and responsible foundation models that unlock the transformative potential of data-efficient generalization without compromising fairness and inclusion.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Does Data-Efficient Generalization Exacerbate Bias in Foundation Models?
Dilermando Queiroz, Anderson Carlos, Ma'ira Fatoretto, Luis Filipe Nakayama, Andr'e Anjos, Lilian Berton
Foundation models have emerged as robust models with label efficiency in diverse domains. In medical imaging, these models contribute to the advancement of medical diagnoses due to the difficulty in obtaining labeled data. However, it is unclear whether using a large amount of unlabeled data, biased by the presence of sensitive attributes during pre-training, influences the fairness of the model. This research examines the bias in the Foundation model (RetFound) when it is applied to fine-tune the Brazilian Multilabel Ophthalmological Dataset (BRSET), which has a different population than the pre-training dataset. The model evaluation, in comparison with supervised learning, shows that the Foundation Model has the potential to reduce the gap between the maximum AUC and minimum AUC evaluations across gender and age groups. However, in a data-efficient generalization, the model increases the bias when the data amount decreases. These findings suggest that when deploying a Foundation Model in real-life scenarios with limited data, the possibility of fairness issues should be considered.
Read more9/4/2024
🔮
0
Is Dataset Quality Still a Concern in Diagnosis Using Large Foundation Model?
Ziqin Lin, Heng Li, Zinan Li, Huazhu Fu, Jiang Liu
Recent advancements in pre-trained large foundation models (LFM) have yielded significant breakthroughs across various domains, including natural language processing and computer vision. These models have been particularly impactful in the domain of medical diagnostic tasks. With abundant unlabeled data, an LFM has been developed for fundus images using the Vision Transformer (VIT) and a self-supervised learning framework. This LFM has shown promising performance in fundus disease diagnosis across multiple datasets. On the other hand, deep learning models have long been challenged by dataset quality issues, such as image quality and dataset bias. To investigate the influence of data quality on LFM, we conducted explorations in two fundus diagnosis tasks using datasets of varying quality. Specifically, we explored the following questions: Is LFM more robust to image quality? Is LFM affected by dataset bias? Can fine-tuning techniques alleviate these effects? Our investigation found that LFM exhibits greater resilience to dataset quality issues, including image quality and dataset bias, compared to typical convolutional networks. Furthermore, we discovered that overall fine-tuning is an effective adapter for LFM to mitigate the impact of dataset quality issues.
Read more5/22/2024
0
Using Backbone Foundation Model for Evaluating Fairness in Chest Radiography Without Demographic Data
Dilermando Queiroz, Andr'e Anjos, Lilian Berton
Ensuring consistent performance across diverse populations and incorporating fairness into machine learning models are crucial for advancing medical image diagnostics and promoting equitable healthcare. However, many databases do not provide protected attributes or contain unbalanced representations of demographic groups, complicating the evaluation of model performance across different demographics and the application of bias mitigation techniques that rely on these attributes. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of using the backbone of Foundation Models as an embedding extractor for creating groups that represent protected attributes, such as gender and age. We propose utilizing these groups in different stages of bias mitigation, including pre-processing, in-processing, and evaluation. Using databases in and out-of-distribution scenarios, it is possible to identify that the method can create groups that represent gender in both databases and reduce in 4.44% the difference between the gender attribute in-distribution and 6.16% in out-of-distribution. However, the model lacks robustness in handling age attributes, underscoring the need for more fundamentally fair and robust Foundation models. These findings suggest a role in promoting fairness assessment in scenarios where we lack knowledge of attributes, contributing to the development of more equitable medical diagnostics.
Read more8/30/2024
0
Evaluating and Benchmarking Foundation Models for Earth Observation and Geospatial AI
Nikolaos Dionelis, Casper Fibaek, Luke Camilleri, Andreas Luyts, Jente Bosmans, Bertrand Le Saux
When we are primarily interested in solving several problems jointly with a given prescribed high performance accuracy for each target application, then Foundation Models should for most cases be used rather than problem-specific models. We focus on the specific Computer Vision application of Foundation Models for Earth Observation (EO) and geospatial AI. These models can solve important problems we are tackling, including for example land cover classification, crop type mapping, flood segmentation, building density estimation, and road regression segmentation. In this paper, we show that for a limited number of labelled data, Foundation Models achieve improved performance compared to problem-specific models. In this work, we also present our proposed evaluation benchmark for Foundation Models for EO. Benchmarking the generalization performance of Foundation Models is important as it has become difficult to standardize a fair comparison across the many different models that have been proposed recently. We present the results using our evaluation benchmark for EO Foundation Models and show that Foundation Models are label efficient in the downstream tasks and help us solve problems we are tackling in EO and remote sensing.
Read more6/27/2024