Is Dataset Quality Still a Concern in Diagnosis Using Large Foundation Model?

Read original: arXiv:2405.12584 - Published 5/22/2024 by Ziqin Lin, Heng Li, Zinan Li, Huazhu Fu, Jiang Liu
Total Score

0

🔮

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Advancements in large foundation models (LFMs) have led to breakthroughs in medical diagnostic tasks, including fundus image analysis.
  • However, deep learning models can be challenged by dataset quality issues like image quality and dataset bias.
  • This paper explores the impact of data quality on the performance of LFMs in fundus disease diagnosis tasks.

Plain English Explanation

Large foundation models (LFMs) are powerful machine learning models that have been pre-trained on vast amounts of data. These models have shown impressive capabilities across various domains, including natural language processing and computer vision. In the medical field, LFMs have been particularly useful for tasks like analyzing fundus images, which are photographs of the back of the eye.

One of the key advantages of LFMs is their ability to learn from large, unlabeled datasets (ref). This means they can extract useful features and patterns from a wide range of data, without needing extensive manual labeling. However, deep learning models, including LFMs, can still be affected by issues with the quality of the data they are trained on.

For example, the quality of the images and the bias in the dataset can impact the model's performance. The researchers in this paper wanted to understand how well LFMs can handle these data quality challenges compared to more traditional convolutional neural networks.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed an LFM for fundus image analysis using a Vision Transformer (ViT) and a self-supervised learning framework. They then tested the performance of this LFM on fundus disease diagnosis tasks, using datasets with varying levels of image quality and dataset bias.

The key findings from their investigation are:

  1. Robustness to Image Quality: LFMs exhibited greater resilience to lower image quality compared to typical convolutional networks.

  2. Resilience to Dataset Bias: LFMs were less affected by dataset bias than convolutional networks.

  3. Effectiveness of Fine-tuning: Fine-tuning techniques were effective in helping LFMs mitigate the impact of dataset quality issues.

These results suggest that LFMs can be more suitable for medical diagnostic tasks, where dataset quality can be a significant challenge. The self-learning capabilities of LFMs allow them to extract useful features even from imperfect data, making them more robust to common dataset quality problems.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough investigation of the impact of data quality on LFM performance in fundus disease diagnosis tasks. The researchers have designed their experiments well, using multiple datasets with varying levels of image quality and dataset bias to assess the LFM's capabilities.

One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses on a specific medical domain (fundus imaging) and may not fully capture the generalizability of the findings to other medical imaging modalities or tasks. Further research could explore the performance of LFMs in a broader range of medical diagnostic scenarios.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the specific mechanisms or architectural choices that contribute to the LFM's resilience to data quality issues. Understanding these underlying factors could lead to further improvements in the design of LFMs and their adaptation to challenging real-world datasets.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the promising potential of large foundation models in medical diagnostic tasks, particularly in the face of dataset quality challenges. The findings suggest that LFMs can be more robust to issues like image quality and dataset bias, making them a valuable tool for medical professionals and researchers working with imperfect data.

The insights from this research could pave the way for more widespread adoption of LFMs in the medical field, potentially leading to improved diagnostic accuracy and better patient outcomes. As the field of machine learning continues to evolve, understanding the strengths and limitations of these powerful models will be crucial for leveraging their full potential in real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔮

Total Score

0

Is Dataset Quality Still a Concern in Diagnosis Using Large Foundation Model?

Ziqin Lin, Heng Li, Zinan Li, Huazhu Fu, Jiang Liu

Recent advancements in pre-trained large foundation models (LFM) have yielded significant breakthroughs across various domains, including natural language processing and computer vision. These models have been particularly impactful in the domain of medical diagnostic tasks. With abundant unlabeled data, an LFM has been developed for fundus images using the Vision Transformer (VIT) and a self-supervised learning framework. This LFM has shown promising performance in fundus disease diagnosis across multiple datasets. On the other hand, deep learning models have long been challenged by dataset quality issues, such as image quality and dataset bias. To investigate the influence of data quality on LFM, we conducted explorations in two fundus diagnosis tasks using datasets of varying quality. Specifically, we explored the following questions: Is LFM more robust to image quality? Is LFM affected by dataset bias? Can fine-tuning techniques alleviate these effects? Our investigation found that LFM exhibits greater resilience to dataset quality issues, including image quality and dataset bias, compared to typical convolutional networks. Furthermore, we discovered that overall fine-tuning is an effective adapter for LFM to mitigate the impact of dataset quality issues.

Read more

5/22/2024

Does Data-Efficient Generalization Exacerbate Bias in Foundation Models?
Total Score

0

Does Data-Efficient Generalization Exacerbate Bias in Foundation Models?

Dilermando Queiroz, Anderson Carlos, Ma'ira Fatoretto, Luis Filipe Nakayama, Andr'e Anjos, Lilian Berton

Foundation models have emerged as robust models with label efficiency in diverse domains. In medical imaging, these models contribute to the advancement of medical diagnoses due to the difficulty in obtaining labeled data. However, it is unclear whether using a large amount of unlabeled data, biased by the presence of sensitive attributes during pre-training, influences the fairness of the model. This research examines the bias in the Foundation model (RetFound) when it is applied to fine-tune the Brazilian Multilabel Ophthalmological Dataset (BRSET), which has a different population than the pre-training dataset. The model evaluation, in comparison with supervised learning, shows that the Foundation Model has the potential to reduce the gap between the maximum AUC and minimum AUC evaluations across gender and age groups. However, in a data-efficient generalization, the model increases the bias when the data amount decreases. These findings suggest that when deploying a Foundation Model in real-life scenarios with limited data, the possibility of fairness issues should be considered.

Read more

9/4/2024

Text-guided Foundation Model Adaptation for Long-Tailed Medical Image Classification
Total Score

0

Text-guided Foundation Model Adaptation for Long-Tailed Medical Image Classification

Sirui Li, Li Lin, Yijin Huang, Pujin Cheng, Xiaoying Tang

In medical contexts, the imbalanced data distribution in long-tailed datasets, due to scarce labels for rare diseases, greatly impairs the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning models. Recent multimodal text-image supervised foundation models offer new solutions to data scarcity through effective representation learning. However, their limited medical-specific pretraining hinders their performance in medical image classification relative to natural images. To address this issue, we propose a novel Text-guided Foundation model Adaptation for Long-Tailed medical image classification (TFA-LT). We adopt a two-stage training strategy, integrating representations from the foundation model using just two linear adapters and a single ensembler for balanced outcomes. Experimental results on two long-tailed medical image datasets validate the simplicity, lightweight and efficiency of our approach: requiring only 6.1% GPU memory usage of the current best-performing algorithm, our method achieves an accuracy improvement of up to 27.1%, highlighting the substantial potential of foundation model adaptation in this area.

Read more

8/28/2024

A Comprehensive Survey of Foundation Models in Medicine
Total Score

0

A Comprehensive Survey of Foundation Models in Medicine

Wasif Khan, Seowung Leem, Kyle B. See, Joshua K. Wong, Shaoting Zhang, Ruogu Fang

Foundation models (FMs) are large-scale deep-learning models trained on extensive datasets using self-supervised techniques. These models serve as a base for various downstream tasks, including healthcare. FMs have been adopted with great success across various domains within healthcare, including natural language processing (NLP), computer vision, graph learning, biology, and omics. Existing healthcare-based surveys have not yet included all of these domains. Therefore, this survey provides a comprehensive overview of FMs in healthcare. We focus on the history, learning strategies, flagship models, applications, and challenges of FMs. We explore how FMs such as the BERT and GPT families are reshaping various healthcare domains, including clinical large language models, medical image analysis, and omics data. Furthermore, we provide a detailed taxonomy of healthcare applications facilitated by FMs, such as clinical NLP, medical computer vision, graph learning, and other biology-related tasks. Despite the promising opportunities FMs provide, they also have several associated challenges, which are explained in detail. We also outline potential future directions to provide researchers and practitioners with insights into the potential and limitations of FMs in healthcare to advance their deployment and mitigate associated risks.

Read more

6/18/2024