Domain Generalisation via Imprecise Learning
2404.04669
0
0
Abstract
Out-of-distribution (OOD) generalisation is challenging because it involves not only learning from empirical data, but also deciding among various notions of generalisation, e.g., optimising the average-case risk, worst-case risk, or interpolations thereof. While this choice should in principle be made by the model operator like medical doctors, this information might not always be available at training time. The institutional separation between machine learners and model operators leads to arbitrary commitments to specific generalisation strategies by machine learners due to these deployment uncertainties. We introduce the Imprecise Domain Generalisation framework to mitigate this, featuring an imprecise risk optimisation that allows learners to stay imprecise by optimising against a continuous spectrum of generalisation strategies during training, and a model framework that allows operators to specify their generalisation preference at deployment. Supported by both theoretical and empirical evidence, our work showcases the benefits of integrating imprecision into domain generalisation.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new approach to domain generalization called "imprecise learning" that aims to improve a model's ability to perform well on unseen data domains.
- The key idea is to train the model to learn a set of imprecise, overlapping hypotheses instead of a single precise hypothesis, which can help the model better generalize to new domains.
- The paper provides a theoretical analysis of imprecise learning and demonstrates its empirical effectiveness on several benchmark domain generalization tasks.
Plain English Explanation
In machine learning, a common challenge is getting models to perform well on data that is different from what they were trained on. This is known as the domain generalization problem. The paper proposes a new approach called "imprecise learning" to address this challenge.
The core idea is that instead of training a model to learn a single, precise hypothesis (i.e., a single way of making predictions), the model is trained to learn a set of overlapping, imprecise hypotheses. This gives the model more flexibility to adapt to new, unseen data domains, rather than being constrained to a single, precise way of doing things.
Imagine you're teaching a child to recognize different types of animals. Instead of just showing them pictures of a single, prototypical example of each animal, you could show them a range of similar-looking animals. This would give the child a more flexible understanding of what counts as, say, a "dog," making it easier for them to recognize dogs they haven't seen before.
The paper provides a theoretical analysis of how imprecise learning can improve a model's ability to generalize, as well as empirical results demonstrating its effectiveness on several standard domain generalization benchmarks.
Technical Explanation
The paper formalizes the idea of "imprecise learning" within an information-theoretic framework for domain generalization. Instead of learning a single, precise hypothesis h that maps inputs x to outputs y, the model learns a set of hypotheses H that are "imprecise" in the sense that they partially overlap with each other.
Specifically, the authors define a loss function that encourages the model to learn a set of hypotheses H that are diverse (i.e., don't completely overlap) but still predictive of the training data. This forces the model to learn multiple, complementary ways of making predictions, rather than converging to a single, precise hypothesis.
The authors provide a theoretical analysis showing that this imprecise learning approach can improve a model's ability to generalize to new, unseen data domains. They also demonstrate the empirical effectiveness of imprecise learning on several standard domain generalization benchmarks, including Colored MNIST and DomainBed.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to the domain generalization problem, with a strong theoretical foundation and empirical results to back it up. However, the authors acknowledge some limitations:
- The specific implementation of imprecise learning used in the paper relies on a constrained form of the hypothesis set H, which may limit the model's flexibility in some cases.
- The experiments are conducted on relatively simple benchmark tasks, and it's unclear how well the approach would scale to more complex, real-world domain generalization problems.
- The authors don't explore the interpretability or explainability of the learned hypothesis set H, which could be an important consideration for certain applications.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of domain generalization, but there is still room for further research and refinement of the imprecise learning approach, particularly in terms of expanding its applicability to more challenging real-world scenarios.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new approach to domain generalization called "imprecise learning" that aims to improve a model's ability to perform well on unseen data domains. By training the model to learn a set of imprecise, overlapping hypotheses instead of a single precise hypothesis, the model can better adapt to new, unseen data distributions.
The authors provide a theoretical analysis of imprecise learning and demonstrate its empirical effectiveness on several benchmark domain generalization tasks. While the approach shows promise, the authors also acknowledge some limitations that could be addressed through further research.
Overall, the paper makes an important contribution to the field of domain generalization and opens up new avenues for developing more robust and adaptable machine learning models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Non-stationary Domain Generalization: Theory and Algorithm
Thai-Hoang Pham, Xueru Zhang, Ping Zhang
0
0
Although recent advances in machine learning have shown its success to learn from independent and identically distributed (IID) data, it is vulnerable to out-of-distribution (OOD) data in an open world. Domain generalization (DG) deals with such an issue and it aims to learn a model from multiple source domains that can be generalized to unseen target domains. Existing studies on DG have largely focused on stationary settings with homogeneous source domains. However, in many applications, domains may evolve along a specific direction (e.g., time, space). Without accounting for such non-stationary patterns, models trained with existing methods may fail to generalize on OOD data. In this paper, we study domain generalization in non-stationary environment. We first examine the impact of environmental non-stationarity on model performance and establish the theoretical upper bounds for the model error at target domains. Then, we propose a novel algorithm based on adaptive invariant representation learning, which leverages the non-stationary pattern to train a model that attains good performance on target domains. Experiments on both synthetic and real data validate the proposed algorithm.
5/14/2024
🤯
On the Limitations of General Purpose Domain Generalisation Methods
Henry Gouk, Ondrej Bohdal, Da Li, Timothy Hospedales
0
0
We investigate the fundamental performance limitations of learning algorithms in several Domain Generalisation (DG) settings. Motivated by the difficulty with which previously proposed methods have in reliably outperforming Empirical Risk Minimisation (ERM), we derive upper bounds on the excess risk of ERM, and lower bounds on the minimax excess risk. Our findings show that in all the DG settings we consider, it is not possible to significantly outperform ERM. Our conclusions are limited not only to the standard covariate shift setting, but also two other settings with additional restrictions on how domains can differ. The first constrains all domains to have a non-trivial bound on pairwise distances, as measured by a broad class of integral probability metrics. The second alternate setting considers a restricted class of DG problems where all domains have the same underlying support. Our analysis also suggests how different strategies can be used to optimise the performance of ERM in each of these DG setting. We also experimentally explore hypotheses suggested by our theoretical analysis.
5/24/2024
🏋️
Out-of-Domain Generalization in Dynamical Systems Reconstruction
Niclas Goring, Florian Hess, Manuel Brenner, Zahra Monfared, Daniel Durstewitz
0
0
In science we are interested in finding the governing equations, the dynamical rules, underlying empirical phenomena. While traditionally scientific models are derived through cycles of human insight and experimentation, recently deep learning (DL) techniques have been advanced to reconstruct dynamical systems (DS) directly from time series data. State-of-the-art dynamical systems reconstruction (DSR) methods show promise in capturing invariant and long-term properties of observed DS, but their ability to generalize to unobserved domains remains an open challenge. Yet, this is a crucial property we would expect from any viable scientific theory. In this work, we provide a formal framework that addresses generalization in DSR. We explain why and how out-of-domain (OOD) generalization (OODG) in DSR profoundly differs from OODG considered elsewhere in machine learning. We introduce mathematical notions based on topological concepts and ergodic theory to formalize the idea of learnability of a DSR model. We formally prove that black-box DL techniques, without adequate structural priors, generally will not be able to learn a generalizing DSR model. We also show this empirically, considering major classes of DSR algorithms proposed so far, and illustrate where and why they fail to generalize across the whole phase space. Our study provides the first comprehensive mathematical treatment of OODG in DSR, and gives a deeper conceptual understanding of where the fundamental problems in OODG lie and how they could possibly be addressed in practice.
6/11/2024
Domain Generalization through Meta-Learning: A Survey
Arsham Gholamzadeh Khoee, Yinan Yu, Robert Feldt
0
0
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have revolutionized artificial intelligence but often lack performance when faced with out-of-distribution (OOD) data, a common scenario due to the inevitable domain shifts in real-world applications. This limitation stems from the common assumption that training and testing data share the same distribution-an assumption frequently violated in practice. Despite their effectiveness with large amounts of data and computational power, DNNs struggle with distributional shifts and limited labeled data, leading to overfitting and poor generalization across various tasks and domains. Meta-learning presents a promising approach by employing algorithms that acquire transferable knowledge across various tasks for fast adaptation, eliminating the need to learn each task from scratch. This survey paper delves into the realm of meta-learning with a focus on its contribution to domain generalization. We first clarify the concept of meta-learning for domain generalization and introduce a novel taxonomy based on the feature extraction strategy and the classifier learning methodology, offering a granular view of methodologies. Through an exhaustive review of existing methods and underlying theories, we map out the fundamentals of the field. Our survey provides practical insights and an informed discussion on promising research directions, paving the way for future innovation in meta-learning for domain generalization.
4/4/2024