Dynamic Incremental Optimization for Best Subset Selection

Read original: arXiv:2402.02322 - Published 6/5/2024 by Shaogang Ren, Xiaoning Qian
Total Score

0

Dynamic Incremental Optimization for Best Subset Selection

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a dynamic incremental optimization approach for best subset selection, which aims to efficiently identify the optimal subset of features from a large set of potential features.
  • The method is designed to handle high-dimensional data and large feature sets, making it applicable to a wide range of machine learning and data analysis tasks.
  • The paper explores the theoretical properties of the proposed approach and demonstrates its advantages through extensive experiments.

Plain English Explanation

The task of best subset selection is to find the optimal subset of features from a large set of potential features, which can be a crucial step in many data analysis and machine learning problems. This paper introduces a dynamic incremental optimization method to tackle this challenge.

The key idea is to incrementally add or remove features from the subset, rather than evaluating all possible subsets at once. This approach is particularly beneficial when working with high-dimensional data and large feature sets, as it can be computationally expensive to exhaustively search through all possible feature combinations.

The dynamic nature of the optimization process allows the method to adapt to changes in the data or the objective function, making it more flexible and efficient than traditional subset selection techniques. The paper also explores the theoretical properties of the proposed approach, demonstrating its advantages in terms of computational complexity and solution quality.

Technical Explanation

The paper formulates the best subset selection problem as an optimization task, where the goal is to identify the subset of features that minimizes a given objective function, such as prediction error or model complexity. To solve this problem efficiently, the authors propose a dynamic incremental optimization approach.

The key steps of the method are:

  1. Initialization: Start with an empty subset of features.
  2. Incremental Update: At each iteration, evaluate the impact of adding or removing a single feature to the current subset and update the subset accordingly.
  3. Termination: Stop the optimization process when no further improvements can be made.

This dynamic and incremental nature of the optimization process allows the method to efficiently explore the space of possible feature subsets, without the need to evaluate all possible combinations. The authors also provide theoretical analysis to characterize the computational complexity and optimality properties of the proposed approach.

The paper presents extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets, demonstrating the advantages of the dynamic incremental optimization method over alternative subset selection techniques, such as greedy algorithms and regularization-based methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the proposed dynamic incremental optimization method for best subset selection. The authors have carefully considered the theoretical properties of the approach and demonstrated its advantages through extensive experiments.

One potential limitation of the method is that it relies on the assumption that the objective function satisfies certain properties, such as submodularity, which may not always hold in practice. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the sensitivity of the method to the choice of the initialization subset or the termination criteria, which could be important factors in its performance.

Further research could explore the extension of the dynamic incremental optimization approach to other types of objective functions or the development of strategies to automatically select the appropriate initialization and termination conditions.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a dynamic incremental optimization method for best subset selection, which aims to efficiently identify the optimal subset of features from a large set of potential features. The key advantages of the proposed approach are its computational efficiency, adaptability to changes in the data or the objective function, and strong theoretical guarantees.

The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of the method, demonstrating its superior performance compared to alternative subset selection techniques. While the method has some limitations, it represents a significant contribution to the field of high-dimensional data analysis and feature selection, with the potential to impact a wide range of applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Dynamic Incremental Optimization for Best Subset Selection
Total Score

0

Dynamic Incremental Optimization for Best Subset Selection

Shaogang Ren, Xiaoning Qian

Best subset selection is considered the `gold standard' for many sparse learning problems. A variety of optimization techniques have been proposed to attack this non-smooth non-convex problem. In this paper, we investigate the dual forms of a family of $ell_0$-regularized problems. An efficient primal-dual algorithm is developed based on the primal and dual problem structures. By leveraging the dual range estimation along with the incremental strategy, our algorithm potentially reduces redundant computation and improves the solutions of best subset selection. Theoretical analysis and experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets validate the efficiency and statistical properties of the proposed solutions.

Read more

6/5/2024

Minimax and Communication-Efficient Distributed Best Subset Selection with Oracle Property
Total Score

0

Minimax and Communication-Efficient Distributed Best Subset Selection with Oracle Property

Jingguo Lan, Hongmei Lin, Xueqin Wang

The explosion of large-scale data in fields such as finance, e-commerce, and social media has outstripped the processing capabilities of single-machine systems, driving the need for distributed statistical inference methods. Traditional approaches to distributed inference often struggle with achieving true sparsity in high-dimensional datasets and involve high computational costs. We propose a novel, two-stage, distributed best subset selection algorithm to address these issues. Our approach starts by efficiently estimating the active set while adhering to the $ell_0$ norm-constrained surrogate likelihood function, effectively reducing dimensionality and isolating key variables. A refined estimation within the active set follows, ensuring sparse estimates and matching the minimax $ell_2$ error bound. We introduce a new splicing technique for adaptive parameter selection to tackle subproblems under $ell_0$ constraints and a Generalized Information Criterion (GIC). Our theoretical and numerical studies show that the proposed algorithm correctly finds the true sparsity pattern, has the oracle property, and greatly lowers communication costs. This is a big step forward in distributed sparse estimation.

Read more

9/2/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Subset-Based Instance Optimality in Private Estimation

Travis Dick, Alex Kulesza, Ziteng Sun, Ananda Theertha Suresh

We propose a new definition of instance optimality for differentially private estimation algorithms. Our definition requires an optimal algorithm to compete, simultaneously for every dataset $D$, with the best private benchmark algorithm that (a) knows $D$ in advance and (b) is evaluated by its worst-case performance on large subsets of $D$. That is, the benchmark algorithm need not perform well when potentially extreme points are added to $D$; it only has to handle the removal of a small number of real data points that already exist. This makes our benchmark significantly stronger than those proposed in prior work. We nevertheless show, for real-valued datasets, how to construct private algorithms that achieve our notion of instance optimality when estimating a broad class of dataset properties, including means, quantiles, and $ell_p$-norm minimizers. For means in particular, we provide a detailed analysis and show that our algorithm simultaneously matches or exceeds the asymptotic performance of existing algorithms under a range of distributional assumptions.

Read more

5/30/2024

Sample-Optimal Large-Scale Optimal Subset Selection
Total Score

0

Sample-Optimal Large-Scale Optimal Subset Selection

Zaile Li, Weiwei Fan, L. Jeff Hong

Ranking and selection (R&S) conventionally aims to select the unique best alternative with the largest mean performance from a finite set of alternatives. However, for better supporting decision making, it may be more informative to deliver a small menu of alternatives whose mean performances are among the top $m$. Such problem, called optimal subset selection (OSS), is generally more challenging to address than the conventional R&S. This challenge becomes even more significant when the number of alternatives is considerably large. Thus, the focus of this paper is on addressing the large-scale OSS problem. To achieve this goal, we design a top-$m$ greedy selection mechanism that keeps sampling the current top $m$ alternatives with top $m$ running sample means and propose the explore-first top-$m$ greedy (EFG-$m$) procedure. Through an extended boundary-crossing framework, we prove that the EFG-$m$ procedure is both sample optimal and consistent in terms of the probability of good selection, confirming its effectiveness in solving large-scale OSS problem. Surprisingly, we also demonstrate that the EFG-$m$ procedure enables to achieve an indifference-based ranking within the selected subset of alternatives at no extra cost. This is highly beneficial as it delivers deeper insights to decision-makers, enabling more informed decision-makings. Lastly, numerical experiments validate our results and demonstrate the efficiency of our procedures.

Read more

8/20/2024