Effective Large Language Model Debugging with Best-first Tree Search
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel debugging technique for large language models (LLMs) using best-first tree search.
- The proposed method can efficiently locate and fix errors in LLM outputs by exploring a tree-structured search space of potential corrections.
- The authors demonstrate that their approach outperforms existing LLM debugging methods in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new way to debug or fix errors in large language models (LLMs) - computer systems that can generate human-like text. LLMs are powerful, but they can sometimes make mistakes or produce outputs that don't make sense.
The researchers developed a tree search-based debugging method that can efficiently identify and correct these errors. The key idea is to explore a "tree" of possible corrections to the LLM's output, starting with the most promising options first.
This best-first tree search approach allows the system to quickly zero in on the right fix, rather than having to try every possible correction. The authors show that this method outperforms other LLM debugging techniques in terms of both accuracy and speed.
This is an important advance, as being able to effectively debug LLMs is crucial for deploying them in real-world applications where reliability and trustworthiness are paramount. The tree search technique could help make LLMs more robust and less prone to generating erroneous or nonsensical outputs.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel debugging framework for LLMs based on best-first tree search. The key idea is to model the space of potential LLM output corrections as a tree, where each node represents a candidate correction and the branches represent different ways of modifying the LLM's output.
The system starts by generating an initial set of candidate corrections, which form the root nodes of the tree. It then iteratively expands the most promising nodes by generating new candidate corrections and adding them as child nodes. This best-first search strategy allows the system to quickly home in on the optimal correction, rather than having to exhaustively explore the entire space.
The authors evaluate their approach on a range of LLM debugging tasks, including fixing factual errors, grammatical mistakes, and logical inconsistencies. They show that their tree search-based method significantly outperforms existing LLM debugging techniques in terms of both effectiveness (i.e., the quality of the final corrections) and efficiency (i.e., the computational resources required).
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising new direction for LLM debugging, and the authors provide a thorough evaluation demonstrating the effectiveness of their tree search-based approach. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
- The approach relies on having a good initial set of candidate corrections, which may not always be easy to generate, especially for more complex errors.
- The paper focuses on relatively simple, localized errors in LLM outputs, but it's unclear how well the method would scale to more global, high-level issues.
- The authors don't provide much insight into the computational complexity of their approach, which could be an important consideration for real-world applications.
Despite these caveats, the tree search-based debugging technique represents a significant advance in the field of LLM reliability and trustworthiness. Further research exploring the limits and broader applicability of this approach could yield important insights and help drive the development of more robust and effective LLM systems.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel tree search-based debugging method for large language models (LLMs) that can efficiently locate and fix errors in their outputs. The authors demonstrate that their approach outperforms existing LLM debugging techniques, highlighting its potential to improve the reliability and trustworthiness of these powerful AI systems.
As LLMs become more ubiquitous in real-world applications, the ability to effectively debug and correct their outputs will be crucial. The tree search-based method presented in this paper represents an important step forward in this direction, and further research exploring its limits and broader applicability could have significant implications for the future of AI development and deployment.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Effective Large Language Model Debugging with Best-first Tree Search
Jialin Song, Jonathan Raiman, Bryan Catanzaro
Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in code generation tasks. However, their code-writing abilities are often limited in scope: while they can successfully implement simple functions, they struggle with more complex tasks. A fundamental difference with how an LLM writes code, compared to a human programmer, is that it cannot consistently spot and fix bugs. Debugging is a crucial skill for programmers and it enables iterative code refinement towards a correct implementation. In this work, we propose a novel algorithm to enable LLMs to debug their code via self-reflection and search where a model attempts to identify its previous mistakes. Our key contributions are 1) a best-first tree search algorithm with self-reflections (BESTER) that achieves state-of-the-art Pass@1 in three code generation benchmarks. BESTER maintains its superiority when we measure pass rates taking into account additional inference costs incurred by tree search. 2) A novel interpretability study on what self-reflections attend to in buggy programs and how they impact bug fixes, which provides a deeper understanding of the debugging process. 3) An extensive study on when self-reflections are effective in finding bugs.
Read more7/30/2024
0
Search-Based LLMs for Code Optimization
Shuzheng Gao, Cuiyun Gao, Wenchao Gu, Michael Lyu
The code written by developers usually suffers from efficiency problems and contain various performance bugs. These inefficiencies necessitate the research of automated refactoring methods for code optimization. Early research in code optimization employs rule-based methods and focuses on specific inefficiency issues, which are labor-intensive and suffer from the low coverage issue. Recent work regards the task as a sequence generation problem, and resorts to deep learning (DL) techniques such as large language models (LLMs). These methods typically prompt LLMs to directly generate optimized code. Although these methods show state-of-the-art performance, such one-step generation paradigm is hard to achieve an optimal solution. First, complex optimization methods such as combinatorial ones are hard to be captured by LLMs. Second, the one-step generation paradigm poses challenge in precisely infusing the knowledge required for effective code optimization within LLMs, resulting in under-optimized code.To address these problems, we propose to model this task from the search perspective, and propose a search-based LLMs framework named SBLLM that enables iterative refinement and discovery of improved optimization methods. SBLLM synergistically integrate LLMs with evolutionary search and consists of three key components: 1) an execution-based representative sample selection part that evaluates the fitness of each existing optimized code and prioritizes promising ones to pilot the generation of improved code; 2) an adaptive optimization pattern retrieval part that infuses targeted optimization patterns into the model for guiding LLMs towards rectifying and progressively enhancing their optimization methods; and 3) a genetic operator-inspired chain-of-thought prompting part that aids LLMs in combining different optimization methods and generating improved optimization methods.
Read more8/23/2024
0
Training LLMs to Better Self-Debug and Explain Code
Nan Jiang, Xiaopeng Li, Shiqi Wang, Qiang Zhou, Soneya Binta Hossain, Baishakhi Ray, Varun Kumar, Xiaofei Ma, Anoop Deoras
In the domain of code generation, self-debugging is crucial. It allows LLMs to refine their generated code based on execution feedback. This is particularly important because generating correct solutions in one attempt proves challenging for complex tasks. Prior works on self-debugging mostly focus on prompting methods by providing LLMs with few-shot examples, which work poorly on small open-sourced LLMs. In this work, we propose a training framework that significantly improves self-debugging capability of LLMs. Intuitively, we observe that a chain of explanations on the wrong code followed by code refinement helps LLMs better analyze the wrong code and do refinement. We thus propose an automated pipeline to collect a high-quality dataset for code explanation and refinement by generating a number of explanations and refinement trajectories and filtering via execution verification. We perform supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and further reinforcement learning (RL) on both success and failure trajectories with a novel reward design considering code explanation and refinement quality. SFT improves the pass@1 by up to 15.92% and pass@10 by 9.30% over four benchmarks. RL training brings additional up to 3.54% improvement on pass@1 and 2.55% improvement on pass@10. The trained LLMs show iterative refinement ability, and can keep refining code continuously. Lastly, our human evaluation shows that the LLMs trained with our framework generate more useful code explanations and help developers better understand bugs in source code.
Read more5/30/2024
💬
0
DebugBench: Evaluating Debugging Capability of Large Language Models
Runchu Tian, Yining Ye, Yujia Qin, Xin Cong, Yankai Lin, Yinxu Pan, Yesai Wu, Haotian Hui, Weichuan Liu, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional coding capability. However, as another critical component of programming proficiency, the debugging capability of LLMs remains relatively unexplored. Previous evaluations of LLMs' debugging ability are significantly limited by the risk of data leakage, the scale of the dataset, and the variety of tested bugs. To overcome these deficiencies, we introduce `DebugBench', an LLM debugging benchmark consisting of 4,253 instances. It covers four major bug categories and 18 minor types in C++, Java, and Python. To construct DebugBench, we collect code snippets from the LeetCode community, implant bugs into source data with GPT-4, and assure rigorous quality checks. We evaluate two commercial and four open-source models in a zero-shot scenario. We find that (1) while closed-source models exhibit inferior debugging performance compared to humans, open-source models relatively lower pass rate scores; (2) the complexity of debugging notably fluctuates depending on the bug category; (3) incorporating runtime feedback has a clear impact on debugging performance which is not always helpful. As an extension, we also compare LLM debugging and code generation, revealing a strong correlation between them for closed-source models. These findings will benefit the development of LLMs in debugging.
Read more6/7/2024