Push and Pull: A Framework for Measuring Attentional Agency

Read original: arXiv:2405.14614 - Published 5/24/2024 by Zachary Wojtowicz, Shrey Jain, Nicholas Vincent
Total Score

0

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes a framework for measuring "attentional agency" - the ability of people to control their attention on digital platforms.
  • Platforms can both extend and limit people's attention through personalization and influencing other users.
  • The framework aims to quantify how much platforms empower people to pull information into their own attention and push information into others' attention.
  • The paper also discusses the implications of generative AI models, which could allow users to bypass methods platforms use to capture economic value from information.
  • The paper concludes with policy strategies to understand and reshape the distribution of attentional agency online.

Plain English Explanation

In the digital age, people's attention has become a valuable resource. Platforms like social media can personalize information to capture our focus, but they also allow us to influence each other's attention. This paper presents a way to measure "attentional agency" - how much control we have over where we focus our attention and what we expose others to.

The key idea is that platforms give us both the ability to pull information into our own attention based on our interests, and to push information into the attention of others. The paper introduces a formal framework for quantifying these two sides of attentional agency. This can shed light on how platforms shape what we see and what others see.

For example, generative AI models could let users bypass the methods platforms use to profit from our attention, fundamentally changing the dynamic. The paper suggests policy strategies to understand and adjust the balance of attentional agency online.

The overall goal is to provide a way to measure and manage the tug-of-war for people's attention on digital platforms, which has important implications for individual agency, information access, and the broader collaboration between humans and AI.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a formal framework for quantifying "attentional agency" - the ability of people to allocate their attention according to their own desires, goals, and intentions on digital platforms. This draws on the insight that platforms extend people's limited attentional capacity by personalizing information, but also allow people to influence each other's attention.

The key components of the framework are:

  1. Attentional pull: The extent to which a platform empowers a person to draw information into their own attentional field based on their preferences.
  2. Attentional push: The extent to which a platform empowers a person to push information into the attentional fields of others.

The paper argues that these two dimensions capture the core mechanisms by which platforms mediate attention. It then uses this framework to analyze the implications of emerging technologies like generative AI models, which could enable users to bypass the "attentional bargain" that underlies ad-supported platforms.

The paper concludes by outlining policy strategies to understand and reshape the distribution of attentional agency online, with the goal of promoting individual agency, equitable access to information, and beneficial human-AI collaboration.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful and well-reasoned framework for analyzing the dynamics of attention on digital platforms. By distinguishing between the ability to pull information into one's own attention and the ability to push information into the attention of others, it provides a useful conceptual lens for understanding how platforms mediate the allocation of this scarce cognitive resource.

One potential limitation is the challenge of actually quantifying these attentional pull and push factors in practice. The paper acknowledges this and suggests that further research is needed to develop robust measurement techniques. Additionally, the framework may oversimplify the complex social and psychological factors that influence attention online.

That said, the core insight - that platforms play a pivotal role in structuring the distribution of attentional agency - is an important one. As the paper notes, this has significant implications for individual autonomy, information access, and the evolving relationship between humans and AI systems. Policymakers and platform designers would do well to consider these dynamics as they work to create a more equitable and empowering digital information ecosystem.

Conclusion

This paper proposes a novel framework for understanding and measuring "attentional agency" on digital platforms. By distinguishing between a person's ability to pull information into their own attention and push information into the attention of others, the framework sheds light on how platforms shape the allocation of this valuable cognitive resource.

The paper's analysis of the implications of emerging technologies like generative AI models is particularly thought-provoking, as it suggests that these advances could disrupt the "attentional bargain" that underlies many current platform business models. Overall, this work offers a valuable conceptual tool for policymakers, platform designers, and researchers seeking to promote individual agency, equitable access to information, and beneficial human-AI collaboration in the digital age.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Total Score

0

Push and Pull: A Framework for Measuring Attentional Agency

Zachary Wojtowicz, Shrey Jain, Nicholas Vincent

We propose a framework for measuring attentional agency - the ability to allocate one's attention according to personal desires, goals, and intentions - on digital platforms. Platforms extend people's limited powers of attention by extrapolating their preferences to large collections of previously unconsidered informational objects. However, platforms typically also allow people to influence one another's attention. We introduce a formal framework for measuring how much a given platform empowers people to both pull information into their own attentional field and push information into the attentional fields of others. We also use these definitions to shed light on the implications of generative foundation models, which enable users to bypass the implicit attentional bargain that underlies embedded advertising and other methods for capturing economic value from informational goods. We conclude with a set of policy strategies that can be used to understand and reshape the distribution of attentional agency online.

Read more

5/24/2024

⛏️

Total Score

0

Attention is all they need: Cognitive science and the (techno)political economy of attention in humans and machines

Pablo Gonz'alez de la Torre, Marta P'erez-Verdugo, Xabier E. Barandiaran

This paper critically analyses the attention economy within the framework of cognitive science and techno-political economics, as applied to both human and machine interactions. We explore how current business models, particularly in digital platform capitalism, harness user engagement by strategically shaping attentional patterns. These platforms utilize advanced AI and massive data analytics to enhance user engagement, creating a cycle of attention capture and data extraction. We review contemporary (neuro)cognitive theories of attention and platform engagement design techniques and criticize classical cognitivist and behaviourist theories for their inadequacies in addressing the potential harms of such engagement on user autonomy and wellbeing. 4E approaches to cognitive science, instead, emphasizing the embodied, extended, enactive, and ecological aspects of cognition, offer us an intrinsic normative standpoint and a more integrated understanding of how attentional patterns are actively constituted by adaptive digital environments. By examining the precarious nature of habit formation in digital contexts, we reveal the techno-economic underpinnings that threaten personal autonomy by disaggregating habits away from the individual, into an AI managed collection of behavioural patterns. Our current predicament suggests the necessity of a paradigm shift towards an ecology of attention. This shift aims to foster environments that respect and preserve human cognitive and social capacities, countering the exploitative tendencies of cognitive capitalism.

Read more

5/13/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Integrated Push-and-Pull Update Model for Goal-Oriented Effective Communication

Pouya Agheli, Nikolaos Pappas, Petar Popovski, Marios Kountouris

This paper studies decision-making for goal-oriented effective communication. We consider an end-to-end status update system where a sensing agent (SA) observes a source, generates and transmits updates to an actuation agent (AA), while the AA takes actions to accomplish a goal at the endpoint. We integrate the push- and pull-based update communication models to obtain a push-and-pull model, which allows the transmission controller at the SA to decide to push an update to the AA and the query controller at the AA to pull updates by raising queries at specific time instances. To gauge effectiveness, we utilize a grade of effectiveness (GoE) metric incorporating updates' freshness, usefulness, and timeliness of actions as qualitative attributes. We then derive effect-aware policies to maximize the expected discounted sum of updates' effectiveness subject to induced costs. The effect-aware policy at the SA considers the potential effectiveness of communicated updates at the endpoint, while at the AA, it accounts for the probabilistic evolution of the source and importance of generated updates. Our results show the proposed push-and-pull model outperforms models solely based on push- or pull-based updates both in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. Additionally, using effect-aware policies at both agents enhances effectiveness compared to periodic and/or probabilistic effect-agnostic policies at either or both agents.

Read more

7/22/2024

An engine not a camera: Measuring performative power of online search
Total Score

0

An engine not a camera: Measuring performative power of online search

Celestine Mendler-Dunner, Gabriele Carovano, Moritz Hardt

The power of digital platforms is at the center of major ongoing policy and regulatory efforts. To advance existing debates, we designed and executed an experiment to measure the power of online search providers, building on the recent definition of performative power. Instantiated in our setting, performative power quantifies the ability of a search engine to steer web traffic by rearranging results. To operationalize this definition we developed a browser extension that performs unassuming randomized experiments in the background. These randomized experiments emulate updates to the search algorithm and identify the causal effect of different content arrangements on clicks. We formally relate these causal effects to performative power. Analyzing tens of thousands of clicks, we discuss what our robust quantitative findings say about the power of online search engines. More broadly, we envision our work to serve as a blueprint for how performative power and online experiments can be integrated with future investigations into the economic power of digital platforms.

Read more

5/30/2024