Enhancing Cooperation through Selective Interaction and Long-term Experiences in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
2405.02654
0
0
Abstract
The significance of network structures in promoting group cooperation within social dilemmas has been widely recognized. Prior studies attribute this facilitation to the assortment of strategies driven by spatial interactions. Although reinforcement learning has been employed to investigate the impact of dynamic interaction on the evolution of cooperation, there remains a lack of understanding about how agents develop neighbour selection behaviours and the formation of strategic assortment within an explicit interaction structure. To address this, our study introduces a computational framework based on multi-agent reinforcement learning in the spatial Prisoner's Dilemma game. This framework allows agents to select dilemma strategies and interacting neighbours based on their long-term experiences, differing from existing research that relies on preset social norms or external incentives. By modelling each agent using two distinct Q-networks, we disentangle the coevolutionary dynamics between cooperation and interaction. The results indicate that long-term experience enables agents to develop the ability to identify non-cooperative neighbours and exhibit a preference for interaction with cooperative ones. This emergent self-organizing behaviour leads to the clustering of agents with similar strategies, thereby increasing network reciprocity and enhancing group cooperation.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how selective interaction and long-term experiences can enhance cooperation in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) systems.
- The authors propose a framework that allows agents to selectively interact with others based on their past experiences, in order to promote cooperative behavior.
- The paper presents experimental results that demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in improving cooperation and task performance in MARL environments.
Plain English Explanation
In multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) systems, agents often need to work together to achieve their goals. However, achieving consistent cooperation can be challenging, as agents may have conflicting interests or struggle to coordinate their actions.
This paper explores a novel approach to enhancing cooperation in MARL. The key idea is to allow agents to selectively interact with others based on their past experiences. By leveraging information about which agents have been cooperative or uncooperative in the past, the agents can make more informed decisions about when and how to interact with their peers.
For example, imagine a team of robots working together to explore and map a new environment. If one robot has a history of being unreliable or unwilling to share information, the other robots might choose to interact with it less, and instead focus their efforts on collaborating with more trustworthy teammates. Over time, this selective interaction can help foster a more cooperative dynamic within the group.
The authors of this paper have developed a framework that implements this idea of selective interaction based on long-term experiences. Through a series of experiments, they demonstrate that this approach can lead to significantly improved cooperation and task performance in MARL environments, compared to traditional approaches that treat all agents equally.
This work has important implications for the design of cooperative multi-agent systems, where promoting effective collaboration is crucial for achieving complex goals. By giving agents more autonomy to manage their own social interactions, the framework presented in this paper could help unlock new levels of coordination and performance in a wide range of applications, from robotic teams to swarm intelligence systems.
Technical Explanation
The core of the authors' approach is a framework that allows agents in a MARL system to selectively interact with one another based on their past experiences. This is implemented through the use of a "selective interaction" module, which keeps track of each agent's history of interactions and uses this information to guide future decisions about who to collaborate with.
Specifically, the selective interaction module maintains a "cooperation score" for each potential partner agent, which reflects the degree to which that agent has exhibited cooperative behavior in the past. Agents then use these cooperation scores to determine how much they should invest in interacting with and learning from different partners.
The authors hypothesize that by allowing agents to focus their efforts on the most cooperative partners, the overall level of cooperation in the system will increase, leading to better task performance. To test this, they conduct experiments in a variety of MARL environments, comparing the performance of their selective interaction framework to that of traditional MARL approaches that treat all agents equally.
The results of these experiments demonstrate that the selective interaction framework does indeed lead to significantly improved cooperation and task performance, across a range of different scenarios. The authors attribute this success to the way the framework allows agents to adaptively manage their social interactions based on long-term experiences, rather than blindly cooperating with all peers.
Critical Analysis
One potential limitation of the selective interaction framework is that it may struggle to effectively handle highly dynamic or uncertain environments, where an agent's cooperation score could fluctuate rapidly. In such cases, the framework's reliance on long-term histories of interaction may not be sufficient, and more sophisticated mechanisms for assessing and responding to immediate partner behavior may be needed.
Additionally, the framework does not explicitly address the problem of coordinating the overall behavior of the multi-agent system. While it can improve cooperation at the individual level, it does not provide a clear way to ensure that the collective behavior of the agents aligns with global objectives or constraints. Addressing this challenge could be an important area for future research.
Another potential concern is the scalability of the selective interaction approach as the number of agents in the system grows. As the number of potential partner interactions increases, the computational and memory requirements of maintaining cooperation scores and making selective interaction decisions could become prohibitive. Strategies for managing this complexity would need to be explored.
Despite these limitations, the core ideas presented in this paper represent an important step forward in the design of cooperative multi-agent systems. By empowering agents to adaptively manage their social interactions based on past experiences, the selective interaction framework offers a promising avenue for enhancing cooperation and task performance in a wide range of MARL applications.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel framework for enhancing cooperation in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) systems. By allowing agents to selectively interact with one another based on their past experiences, the framework promotes the emergence of more cooperative and effective collective behavior.
The authors' experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, showing significant improvements in cooperation and task performance compared to traditional MARL methods. While the framework has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the design of cooperative multi-agent systems, and could have important implications for a wide range of applications, from robotic teams to swarm intelligence.
Overall, this paper highlights the value of giving agents more autonomy and agency in managing their social interactions, as a means of enhancing cooperation and collaboration in complex, multi-agent environments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤔
Cooperation Dynamics in Multi-Agent Systems: Exploring Game-Theoretic Scenarios with Mean-Field Equilibria
Vaigarai Sathi, Sabahat Shaik, Jaswanth Nidamanuri
0
0
Cooperation is fundamental in Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), often requiring agents to balance individual gains with collective rewards. In this regard, this paper aims to investigate strategies to invoke cooperation in game-theoretic scenarios, namely the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma, where agents must optimize both individual and group outcomes. Existing cooperative strategies are analyzed for their effectiveness in promoting group-oriented behavior in repeated games. Modifications are proposed where encouraging group rewards will also result in a higher individual gain, addressing real-world dilemmas seen in distributed systems. The study extends to scenarios with exponentially growing agent populations ($N longrightarrow +infty$), where traditional computation and equilibrium determination are challenging. Leveraging mean-field game theory, equilibrium solutions and reward structures are established for infinitely large agent sets in repeated games. Finally, practical insights are offered through simulations using the Multi Agent-Posthumous Credit Assignment trainer, and the paper explores adapting simulation algorithms to create scenarios favoring cooperation for group rewards. These practical implementations bridge theoretical concepts with real-world applications.
5/6/2024
Reciprocal Reward Influence Encourages Cooperation From Self-Interested Agents
John L. Zhou, Weizhe Hong, Jonathan C. Kao
0
0
Emergent cooperation among self-interested individuals is a widespread phenomenon in the natural world, but remains elusive in interactions between artificially intelligent agents. Instead, naive reinforcement learning algorithms typically converge to Pareto-dominated outcomes in even the simplest of social dilemmas. An emerging class of opponent-shaping methods have demonstrated the ability to reach prosocial outcomes by influencing the learning of other agents. However, they rely on higher-order derivatives through the predicted learning step of other agents or learning meta-game dynamics, which in turn rely on stringent assumptions over opponent learning rules or exponential sample complexity, respectively. To provide a learning rule-agnostic and sample-efficient alternative, we introduce Reciprocators, reinforcement learning agents which are intrinsically motivated to reciprocate the influence of an opponent's actions on their returns. This approach effectively seeks to modify other agents' $Q$-values by increasing their return following beneficial actions (with respect to the Reciprocator) and decreasing it after detrimental actions, guiding them towards mutually beneficial actions without attempting to directly shape policy updates. We show that Reciprocators can be used to promote cooperation in a variety of temporally extended social dilemmas during simultaneous learning.
6/5/2024
🏅
Investigating the Impact of Direct Punishment on the Emergence of Cooperation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Systems
Nayana Dasgupta, Mirco Musolesi
0
0
Solving the problem of cooperation is fundamentally important for the creation and maintenance of functional societies. Problems of cooperation are omnipresent within human society, with examples ranging from navigating busy road junctions to negotiating treaties. As the use of AI becomes more pervasive throughout society, the need for socially intelligent agents capable of navigating these complex cooperative dilemmas is becoming increasingly evident. Direct punishment is a ubiquitous social mechanism that has been shown to foster the emergence of cooperation in both humans and non-humans. In the natural world, direct punishment is often strongly coupled with partner selection and reputation and used in conjunction with third-party punishment. The interactions between these mechanisms could potentially enhance the emergence of cooperation within populations. However, no previous work has evaluated the learning dynamics and outcomes emerging from Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) populations that combine these mechanisms. This paper addresses this gap. It presents a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the behaviors and learning dynamics associated with direct punishment, third-party punishment, partner selection, and reputation. Finally, we discuss the implications of using these mechanisms on the design of cooperative AI systems.
6/19/2024
Group-Aware Coordination Graph for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Wei Duan, Jie Lu, Junyu Xuan
0
0
Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) necessitates seamless collaboration among agents, often represented by an underlying relation graph. Existing methods for learning this graph primarily focus on agent-pair relations, neglecting higher-order relationships. While several approaches attempt to extend cooperation modelling to encompass behaviour similarities within groups, they commonly fall short in concurrently learning the latent graph, thereby constraining the information exchange among partially observed agents. To overcome these limitations, we present a novel approach to infer the Group-Aware Coordination Graph (GACG), which is designed to capture both the cooperation between agent pairs based on current observations and group-level dependencies from behaviour patterns observed across trajectories. This graph is further used in graph convolution for information exchange between agents during decision-making. To further ensure behavioural consistency among agents within the same group, we introduce a group distance loss, which promotes group cohesion and encourages specialization between groups. Our evaluations, conducted on StarCraft II micromanagement tasks, demonstrate GACG's superior performance. An ablation study further provides experimental evidence of the effectiveness of each component of our method.
5/14/2024