Enhancing Knowledge Tracing with Concept Map and Response Disentanglement
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes a new approach to enhance knowledge tracing by incorporating a concept map and response disentanglement.
- Knowledge tracing aims to model a student's knowledge state over time based on their responses to educational activities.
- The proposed method leverages a concept map to capture the relationships between different knowledge concepts, and disentangles the student's responses to better infer their underlying knowledge.
Plain English Explanation
The research paper describes a new way to track a student's learning progress more effectively. The key idea is to use a concept map to understand how different topics are connected, and to break down the student's responses into more detailed components.
Traditionally, knowledge tracing models have tried to infer a student's overall knowledge state based on their performance on various learning activities. However, this can be challenging because a single response may reflect a student's understanding of multiple concepts. The new approach proposed in this paper aims to "disentangle" the different factors influencing a student's response, providing a more nuanced view of their knowledge.
By incorporating a concept map that captures the relationships between topics, the model can better isolate which specific concepts a student has learned or is still struggling with. This additional context can lead to more accurate predictions of a student's knowledge state over time, which could in turn support more personalized and effective learning experiences.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new knowledge tracing model called CMRD (Concept Map and Response Disentanglement) that extends existing approaches.
The key innovations are:
-
Concept Map Integration: The model incorporates a pre-defined concept map that represents the relationships between different knowledge concepts covered in the educational content. This provides additional structural information to guide the knowledge tracing process.
-
Response Disentanglement: The model disentangles each student response into separate components corresponding to the different concepts involved. This allows the model to more precisely infer which specific concepts a student has mastered or is still struggling with, rather than just their overall performance.
The CMRD model is evaluated on several benchmark datasets and shown to outperform traditional knowledge tracing approaches in terms of accurately predicting student performance and inferring their knowledge state. The authors hypothesize that the concept map and response disentanglement components enable the model to capture more nuanced and interpretable insights about student learning.
Critical Analysis
The proposed CMRD model represents a thoughtful extension of knowledge tracing techniques, leveraging additional structural information and response-level analysis to enhance the modeling of student knowledge. The incorporation of a concept map is a particularly compelling addition, as it aligns well with educational practices of organizing content into interconnected topics.
However, a potential limitation is the reliance on a pre-defined concept map. In practice, creating an accurate and comprehensive concept map for a given domain may require significant manual effort or additional machine learning techniques. The authors do not provide much guidance on how such a concept map would be constructed in a real-world setting.
Additionally, the response disentanglement component, while theoretically valuable, may be challenging to implement in a robust and generalizable way. The paper does not provide extensive details on the specific algorithms used for this purpose, or how they would scale to complex, open-ended student responses.
Further research could explore ways to automatically construct or learn concept maps from data, as well as more sophisticated techniques for disentangling student responses. Validating the CMRD model's performance and interpretability in real-world educational contexts would also be an important next step.
Conclusion
The CMRD model proposed in this paper represents a promising approach to enhancing knowledge tracing by leveraging a concept map and response disentanglement. By incorporating additional structural information about the relationships between knowledge concepts, and better isolating the specific factors influencing student responses, the model has the potential to provide more accurate and interpretable insights into student learning.
While there are some practical challenges to address, the core ideas behind CMRD suggest that integrating domain knowledge and response-level analysis could be a fruitful direction for improving the state of the art in knowledge tracing and supporting more personalized and effective educational experiences.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Enhancing Knowledge Tracing with Concept Map and Response Disentanglement
Soonwook Park, Donghoon Lee, Hogun Park
In the rapidly advancing realm of educational technology, it becomes critical to accurately trace and understand student knowledge states. Conventional Knowledge Tracing (KT) models have mainly focused on binary responses (i.e., correct and incorrect answers) to questions. Unfortunately, they largely overlook the essential information in students' actual answer choices, particularly for Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs), which could help reveal each learner's misconceptions or knowledge gaps. To tackle these challenges, we propose the Concept map-driven Response disentanglement method for enhancing Knowledge Tracing (CRKT) model. CRKT benefits KT by directly leveraging answer choices--beyond merely identifying correct or incorrect answers--to distinguish responses with different incorrect choices. We further introduce the novel use of unchosen responses by employing disentangled representations to get insights from options not selected by students. Additionally, CRKT tracks the student's knowledge state at the concept level and encodes the concept map, representing the relationships between them, to better predict unseen concepts. This approach is expected to provide actionable feedback, improving the learning experience. Our comprehensive experiments across multiple datasets demonstrate CRKT's effectiveness, achieving superior performance in prediction accuracy and interpretability over state-of-the-art models.
Read more8/26/2024
0
Interpretable Knowledge Tracing via Response Influence-based Counterfactual Reasoning
Jiajun Cui, Minghe Yu, Bo Jiang, Aimin Zhou, Jianyong Wang, Wei Zhang
Knowledge tracing (KT) plays a crucial role in computer-aided education and intelligent tutoring systems, aiming to assess students' knowledge proficiency by predicting their future performance on new questions based on their past response records. While existing deep learning knowledge tracing (DLKT) methods have significantly improved prediction accuracy and achieved state-of-the-art results, they often suffer from a lack of interpretability. To address this limitation, current approaches have explored incorporating psychological influences to achieve more explainable predictions, but they tend to overlook the potential influences of historical responses. In fact, understanding how models make predictions based on response influences can enhance the transparency and trustworthiness of the knowledge tracing process, presenting an opportunity for a new paradigm of interpretable KT. However, measuring unobservable response influences is challenging. In this paper, we resort to counterfactual reasoning that intervenes in each response to answer textit{what if a student had answered a question incorrectly that he/she actually answered correctly, and vice versa}. Based on this, we propose RCKT, a novel response influence-based counterfactual knowledge tracing framework. RCKT generates response influences by comparing prediction outcomes from factual sequences and constructed counterfactual sequences after interventions. Additionally, we introduce maximization and inference techniques to leverage accumulated influences from different past responses, further improving the model's performance and credibility. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our RCKT method outperforms state-of-the-art knowledge tracing methods on four datasets against six baselines, and provides credible interpretations of response influences.
Read more6/3/2024
0
A Question-centric Multi-experts Contrastive Learning Framework for Improving the Accuracy and Interpretability of Deep Sequential Knowledge Tracing Models
Hengyuan Zhang, Zitao Liu, Chenming Shang, Dawei Li, Yong Jiang
Knowledge tracing (KT) plays a crucial role in predicting students' future performance by analyzing their historical learning processes. Deep neural networks (DNNs) have shown great potential in solving the KT problem. However, there still exist some important challenges when applying deep learning techniques to model the KT process. The first challenge lies in taking the individual information of the question into modeling. This is crucial because, despite questions sharing the same knowledge component (KC), students' knowledge acquisition on homogeneous questions can vary significantly. The second challenge lies in interpreting the prediction results from existing deep learning-based KT models. In real-world applications, while it may not be necessary to have complete transparency and interpretability of the model parameters, it is crucial to present the model's prediction results in a manner that teachers find interpretable. This makes teachers accept the rationale behind the prediction results and utilize them to design teaching activities and tailored learning strategies for students. However, the inherent black-box nature of deep learning techniques often poses a hurdle for teachers to fully embrace the model's prediction results. To address these challenges, we propose a Question-centric Multi-experts Contrastive Learning framework for KT called Q-MCKT. We have provided all the datasets and code on our website at https://github.com/rattlesnakey/Q-MCKT.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Disentangling Heterogeneous Knowledge Concept Embedding for Cognitive Diagnosis on Untested Knowledge
Kui Xiao, Runtian Xing, Miao Zhang, Shunfeng Tan, Ziming Wang, Xiaolian Zhu
Cognitive diagnosis is a fundamental and critical task in learning assessment, which aims to infer students' proficiency on knowledge concepts from their response logs. Current works assume each knowledge concept will certainly be tested and covered by multiple exercises. However, whether online or offline courses, it's hardly feasible to completely cover all knowledge concepts in several exercises. Restricted tests lead to undiscovered knowledge deficits, especially untested knowledge concepts(UKCs). In this paper, we propose a novel underline{Dis}entangling Heterogeneous underline{K}nowledge underline{C}ognitive underline{D}iagnosis framework on untested knowledge(DisKCD). Specifically, we leverage course grades, exercise questions, and resources to learn the potential representations of students, exercises, and knowledge concepts. In particular, knowledge concepts are disentangled into tested and untested based on the limiting actual exercises. We construct a heterogeneous relation graph network via students, exercises, tested knowledge concepts(TKCs), and UKCs. Then, through a hierarchical heterogeneous message-passing mechanism, the fine-grained relations are incorporated into the embeddings of the entities. Finally, the embeddings will be applied to multiple existing cognitive diagnosis models to infer students' proficiency on UKCs. Experimental results on real-world datasets show that the proposed model can effectively improve the performance of the task of diagnosing students' proficiency on UKCs. Our anonymous code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DisKCD.
Read more5/28/2024