Enhancing Low-Precision Sampling via Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo

Read original: arXiv:2310.16320 - Published 7/16/2024 by Ziyi Wang, Yujie Chen, Qifan Song, Ruqi Zhang
Total Score

0

🗣️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates a technique called low-precision Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (SGHMC) for training deep neural networks more efficiently.
  • Low-precision training uses reduced numerical precision (e.g., 8-bit instead of 32-bit) to speed up computation and reduce memory usage, without sacrificing much accuracy.
  • The paper's Bayesian approach provides uncertainty quantification and improved generalization performance.
  • The authors compare low-precision SGHMC to another low-precision sampling method, Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD), both theoretically and empirically.

Plain English Explanation

Deep neural networks are powerful machine learning models that can achieve impressive results, but training them can be computationally expensive and memory-intensive. Low-precision training is a technique that addresses this by using reduced numerical precision (e.g., 8-bit instead of 32-bit) for the calculations during training. This can speed up the training process and reduce the amount of memory required without sacrificing much accuracy.

The authors of this paper take a Bayesian approach to low-precision training, using a technique called Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (SGHMC). This not only provides computational efficiency but also allows for uncertainty quantification and improved generalization performance. Essentially, the Bayesian approach gives the model a better understanding of how confident it should be in its predictions.

The paper compares low-precision SGHMC to another low-precision sampling method called Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD). Theoretically, the authors show that low-precision SGHMC achieves a quadratic improvement in efficiency compared to SGLD for certain types of distributions. This means that low-precision SGHMC can achieve the same level of accuracy as SGLD using far fewer computational resources.

The authors also find that low-precision SGHMC is more robust to the errors introduced by the reduced numerical precision, thanks to the way it updates the model using momentum. This makes it a more reliable and accurate sampling method, especially for large-scale and resource-limited machine learning applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the use of low-precision sampling via Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (SGHMC) for training deep neural networks. SGHMC is a Bayesian sampling method that can provide uncertainty quantification and improved generalization accuracy compared to standard training approaches.

Theoretically, the authors show that low-precision SGHMC achieves a quadratic improvement in efficiency compared to the state-of-the-art low-precision sampler, Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD), for non-log-concave distributions. Specifically, they prove that to achieve an ε-error in the 2-Wasserstein distance, low-precision SGHMC requires $\widetilde{\mathbf{O}}(\epsilon^{-2}{\mu^

}^{-2}\log^2(\epsilon^{-1}))$ iterations, while SGLD requires $\widetilde{\mathbf{O}}({\epsilon}^{-4}{\lambda^
}^{-1}\log^5(\epsilon^{-1}))$ iterations.

Furthermore, the authors show that low-precision SGHMC is more robust to the quantization error introduced by the reduced numerical precision compared to low-precision SGLD. This is due to the momentum-based updates in SGHMC, which are more resilient to gradient noise.

Empirically, the authors conduct experiments on synthetic data, as well as the MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100 datasets. These results validate the theoretical findings and demonstrate the potential of low-precision SGHMC as an efficient and accurate sampling method for large-scale and resource-limited machine learning applications.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis of low-precision SGHMC and compares it to low-precision SGLD. The authors' proofs show that low-precision SGHMC can achieve significant computational savings compared to SGLD, which is an important and practical result.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the low-precision approach. For example, the impact of reduced numerical precision on the model's generalization ability and robustness to adversarial attacks is not explored. Additionally, the authors only consider synthetic and relatively simple image datasets in their experiments, and it would be helpful to see the performance of low-precision SGHMC on more complex real-world tasks.

Further research could also investigate the sensitivity of low-precision SGHMC to hyperparameter tuning and the potential trade-offs between computational efficiency and model accuracy. Comparisons to other low-precision training methods, such as robust approximate sampling or multi-fidelity Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, could also provide valuable insights.

Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the field of efficient Bayesian sampling for machine learning, but there are still opportunities for further exploration and understanding the limitations of the low-precision SGHMC approach.

Conclusion

This paper presents a promising technique called low-precision Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (SGHMC) for training deep neural networks more efficiently. The Bayesian approach of low-precision SGHMC provides computational benefits, uncertainty quantification, and improved generalization performance compared to standard training methods.

Theoretically, the authors show that low-precision SGHMC achieves a quadratic improvement in efficiency over the state-of-the-art low-precision sampler, Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD). Empirically, the results on synthetic and image classification datasets validate these theoretical findings.

The paper highlights the potential of low-precision SGHMC as an effective and accurate sampling method for large-scale and resource-limited machine learning applications. Further research could explore the broader implications of this technique, such as its impact on model robustness and generalization, as well as comparisons to other low-precision training approaches.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🗣️

Total Score

0

Enhancing Low-Precision Sampling via Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo

Ziyi Wang, Yujie Chen, Qifan Song, Ruqi Zhang

Low-precision training has emerged as a promising low-cost technique to enhance the training efficiency of deep neural networks without sacrificing much accuracy. Its Bayesian counterpart can further provide uncertainty quantification and improved generalization accuracy. This paper investigates low-precision sampling via Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (SGHMC) with low-precision and full-precision gradient accumulators for both strongly log-concave and non-log-concave distributions. Theoretically, our results show that, to achieve $epsilon$-error in the 2-Wasserstein distance for non-log-concave distributions, low-precision SGHMC achieves quadratic improvement ($widetilde{mathbf{O}}left({epsilon^{-2}{mu^*}^{-2}log^2left({epsilon^{-1}}right)}right)$) compared to the state-of-the-art low-precision sampler, Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) ($widetilde{mathbf{O}}left({{epsilon}^{-4}{lambda^{*}}^{-1}log^5left({epsilon^{-1}}right)}right)$). Moreover, we prove that low-precision SGHMC is more robust to the quantization error compared to low-precision SGLD due to the robustness of the momentum-based update w.r.t. gradient noise. Empirically, we conduct experiments on synthetic data, and {MNIST, CIFAR-10 & CIFAR-100} datasets, which validate our theoretical findings. Our study highlights the potential of low-precision SGHMC as an efficient and accurate sampling method for large-scale and resource-limited machine learning.

Read more

7/16/2024

🔍

Total Score

0

Non-asymptotic convergence analysis of the stochastic gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm with discontinuous stochastic gradient with applications to training of ReLU neural networks

Luxu Liang, Ariel Neufeld, Ying Zhang

In this paper, we provide a non-asymptotic analysis of the convergence of the stochastic gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (SGHMC) algorithm to a target measure in Wasserstein-1 and Wasserstein-2 distance. Crucially, compared to the existing literature on SGHMC, we allow its stochastic gradient to be discontinuous. This allows us to provide explicit upper bounds, which can be controlled to be arbitrarily small, for the expected excess risk of non-convex stochastic optimization problems with discontinuous stochastic gradients, including, among others, the training of neural networks with ReLU activation function. To illustrate the applicability of our main results, we consider numerical experiments on quantile estimation and on several optimization problems involving ReLU neural networks relevant in finance and artificial intelligence.

Read more

9/26/2024

Faster Sampling via Stochastic Gradient Proximal Sampler
Total Score

0

Faster Sampling via Stochastic Gradient Proximal Sampler

Xunpeng Huang, Difan Zou, Yi-An Ma, Hanze Dong, Tong Zhang

Stochastic gradients have been widely integrated into Langevin-based methods to improve their scalability and efficiency in solving large-scale sampling problems. However, the proximal sampler, which exhibits much faster convergence than Langevin-based algorithms in the deterministic setting Lee et al. (2021), has yet to be explored in its stochastic variants. In this paper, we study the Stochastic Proximal Samplers (SPS) for sampling from non-log-concave distributions. We first establish a general framework for implementing stochastic proximal samplers and establish the convergence theory accordingly. We show that the convergence to the target distribution can be guaranteed as long as the second moment of the algorithm trajectory is bounded and restricted Gaussian oracles can be well approximated. We then provide two implementable variants based on Stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics (SGLD) and Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm (MALA), giving rise to SPS-SGLD and SPS-MALA. We further show that SPS-SGLD and SPS-MALA can achieve $epsilon$-sampling error in total variation (TV) distance within $tilde{mathcal{O}}(depsilon^{-2})$ and $tilde{mathcal{O}}(d^{1/2}epsilon^{-2})$ gradient complexities, which outperform the best-known result by at least an $tilde{mathcal{O}}(d^{1/3})$ factor. This enhancement in performance is corroborated by our empirical studies on synthetic data with various dimensions, demonstrating the efficiency of our proposed algorithm.

Read more

5/28/2024

Robust Approximate Sampling via Stochastic Gradient Barker Dynamics
Total Score

0

Robust Approximate Sampling via Stochastic Gradient Barker Dynamics

Lorenzo Mauri, Giacomo Zanella

Stochastic Gradient (SG) Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithms (MCMC) are popular algorithms for Bayesian sampling in the presence of large datasets. However, they come with little theoretical guarantees and assessing their empirical performances is non-trivial. In such context, it is crucial to develop algorithms that are robust to the choice of hyperparameters and to gradients heterogeneity since, in practice, both the choice of step-size and behaviour of target gradients induce hard-to-control biases in the invariant distribution. In this work we introduce the stochastic gradient Barker dynamics (SGBD) algorithm, extending the recently developed Barker MCMC scheme, a robust alternative to Langevin-based sampling algorithms, to the stochastic gradient framework. We characterize the impact of stochastic gradients on the Barker transition mechanism and develop a bias-corrected version that, under suitable assumptions, eliminates the error due to the gradient noise in the proposal. We illustrate the performance on a number of high-dimensional examples, showing that SGBD is more robust to hyperparameter tuning and to irregular behavior of the target gradients compared to the popular stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics algorithm.

Read more

5/16/2024