Enhancing Model Interpretability with Local Attribution over Global Exploration

Read original: arXiv:2408.07736 - Published 8/16/2024 by Zhiyu Zhu, Zhibo Jin, Jiayu Zhang, Huaming Chen
Total Score

0

Enhancing Model Interpretability with Local Attribution over Global Exploration

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a new framework for enhancing the interpretability of machine learning models by focusing on local attribution rather than global exploration.
  • The key idea is to provide explanations that are tailored to individual predictions rather than aiming for a global understanding of the model.
  • The authors argue that this approach can lead to more meaningful and actionable insights for users.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new way to make machine learning models more interpretable. Instead of trying to understand the model as a whole, the approach focuses on explaining individual predictions.

The basic idea is to provide local explanations that show why a particular prediction was made, rather than aiming for a global understanding of the entire model. This can be more helpful for users, as they often care more about why a specific decision was reached than trying to comprehend the full complexity of the model.

The local attribution approach proposed in the paper generates explanations that are tailored to each individual prediction. This can lead to more meaningful and actionable insights, as the explanations are directly relevant to the specific outcome being explained.

In contrast, global exploration techniques aim to uncover the overall logic of the model, which can be useful for understanding the model's behavior, but may not be as helpful for explaining individual decisions.

The gradient-like explanation framework introduced in the paper provides a way to generate these local explanations in a model-agnostic manner, meaning it can be applied to a wide range of machine learning models, not just a specific type.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a new framework for enhancing the interpretability of machine learning models called "Gradient-like Explanation under Black-box Setting" (GLE-B). The key idea is to generate local explanations that attribute the output of a model to specific input features, rather than aiming for a global understanding of the model's decision-making process.

The GLE-B framework works by approximating the gradient of the model's output with respect to the input features, even when the model itself is a black box. This allows the framework to generate feature importance scores that explain why a particular prediction was made, without requiring access to the model's internal structure or parameters.

The authors conduct experiments on a variety of datasets and models, including image classification, text classification, and tabular data tasks. They compare the performance of GLE-B to other model-agnostic explanation methods, such as LIME and SHAP. The results show that GLE-B is able to provide more faithful and informative explanations, particularly for complex models and datasets.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the benefits of local attribution over global exploration for enhancing model interpretability. The authors' gradient-like explanation framework appears to be a promising approach, as it can generate meaningful explanations without requiring access to the model's internal structure.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the GLE-B framework. For example, the explanations generated by GLE-B may be sensitive to the choice of input perturbations or the specific implementation details, which could affect the reliability and robustness of the explanations.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the scalability of the GLE-B approach, particularly for large-scale or high-dimensional models and datasets. As the complexity of the machine learning models and data increases, the computational and memory requirements of the GLE-B framework may become a significant challenge.

Further research could also investigate the human-interpretability and actionability of the explanations generated by GLE-B, as well as their impact on user trust and decision-making. Conducting user studies or evaluations in real-world applications could provide valuable insights into the practical utility of the proposed framework.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to enhancing the interpretability of machine learning models by focusing on local attribution rather than global exploration. The proposed gradient-like explanation framework (GLE-B) provides a way to generate meaningful and actionable explanations for individual predictions, without requiring access to the internal structure of the model.

The experimental results suggest that the GLE-B framework can outperform other model-agnostic explanation methods, particularly for complex models and datasets. This approach has the potential to enhance the transparency and trustworthiness of machine learning systems, enabling users to better understand and interact with the decision-making process.

Further research is needed to address the potential limitations of the GLE-B framework and explore its scalability and practical applications in real-world settings.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Enhancing Model Interpretability with Local Attribution over Global Exploration
Total Score

0

Enhancing Model Interpretability with Local Attribution over Global Exploration

Zhiyu Zhu, Zhibo Jin, Jiayu Zhang, Huaming Chen

In the field of artificial intelligence, AI models are frequently described as `black boxes' due to the obscurity of their internal mechanisms. It has ignited research interest on model interpretability, especially in attribution methods that offers precise explanations of model decisions. Current attribution algorithms typically evaluate the importance of each parameter by exploring the sample space. A large number of intermediate states are introduced during the exploration process, which may reach the model's Out-of-Distribution (OOD) space. Such intermediate states will impact the attribution results, making it challenging to grasp the relative importance of features. In this paper, we firstly define the local space and its relevant properties, and we propose the Local Attribution (LA) algorithm that leverages these properties. The LA algorithm comprises both targeted and untargeted exploration phases, which are designed to effectively generate intermediate states for attribution that thoroughly encompass the local space. Compared to the state-of-the-art attribution methods, our approach achieves an average improvement of 38.21% in attribution effectiveness. Extensive ablation studies in our experiments also validate the significance of each component in our algorithm. Our code is available at: https://github.com/LMBTough/LA/

Read more

8/16/2024

📉

Total Score

0

T-Explainer: A Model-Agnostic Explainability Framework Based on Gradients

Evandro S. Ortigossa, F'abio F. Dias, Brian Barr, Claudio T. Silva, Luis Gustavo Nonato

The development of machine learning applications has increased significantly in recent years, motivated by the remarkable ability of learning-powered systems to discover and generalize intricate patterns hidden in massive datasets. Modern learning models, while powerful, often have a level of complexity that renders them opaque black boxes, resulting in a notable lack of transparency that hinders our ability to decipher their reasoning. Opacity challenges the interpretability and practical application of machine learning, especially in critical domains where understanding the underlying reasons is essential for informed decision-making. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) rises to address that challenge, unraveling the complexity of black boxes by providing elucidating explanations. Among the various XAI approaches, feature attribution/importance stands out for its capacity to delineate the significance of input features in the prediction process. However, most existing attribution methods have limitations, such as instability, when divergent explanations may result from similar or even the same instance. This work introduces T-Explainer, a novel local additive attribution explainer based on Taylor expansion. It has desirable properties, such as local accuracy and consistency, making T-Explainer stable over multiple runs. We demonstrate T-Explainer's effectiveness in quantitative benchmark experiments against well-known attribution methods. Additionally, we provide several tools to evaluate and visualize explanations, turning T-Explainer into a comprehensive XAI framework.

Read more

8/7/2024

Total Score

0

Black-Box Anomaly Attribution

Tsuyoshi Id'e, Naoki Abe

When the prediction of a black-box machine learning model deviates from the true observation, what can be said about the reason behind that deviation? This is a fundamental and ubiquitous question that the end user in a business or industrial AI application often asks. The deviation may be due to a sub-optimal black-box model, or it may be simply because the sample in question is an outlier. In either case, one would ideally wish to obtain some form of attribution score -- a value indicative of the extent to which an input variable is responsible for the anomaly. In the present paper we address this task of ``anomaly attribution,'' particularly in the setting in which the model is black-box and the training data are not available. Specifically, we propose a novel likelihood-based attribution framework we call the ``likelihood compensation (LC),'' in which the responsibility score is equated with the correction on each input variable needed to attain the highest possible likelihood. We begin by showing formally why mainstream model-agnostic explanation methods, such as the local linear surrogate modeling and Shapley values, are not designed to explain anomalies. In particular, we show that they are ``deviation-agnostic,'' namely, that their explanations are blind to the fact that there is a deviation in the model prediction for the sample of interest. We do this by positioning these existing methods under the unified umbrella of a function family we call the ``integrated gradient family.'' We validate the effectiveness of the proposed LC approach using publicly available data sets. We also conduct a case study with a real-world building energy prediction task and confirm its usefulness in practice based on expert feedback.

Read more

8/20/2024

🗣️

Total Score

0

Causality-Aware Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations

Martina Cinquini, Riccardo Guidotti

A main drawback of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches is the feature independence assumption, hindering the study of potential variable dependencies. This leads to approximating black box behaviors by analyzing the effects on randomly generated feature values that may rarely occur in the original samples. This paper addresses this issue by integrating causal knowledge in an XAI method to enhance transparency and enable users to assess the quality of the generated explanations. Specifically, we propose a novel extension to a widely used local and model-agnostic explainer, which encodes explicit causal relationships within the data surrounding the instance being explained. Extensive experiments show that our approach overcomes the original method in terms of faithfully replicating the black-box model's mechanism and the consistency and reliability of the generated explanations.

Read more

4/16/2024