Enhancing Security and Privacy in Federated Learning using Update Digests and Voting-Based Defense
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes two techniques to enhance security and privacy in federated learning: update digests and voting-based defense.
- Update digests help protect against data poisoning attacks by verifying the integrity of model updates submitted by clients.
- Voting-based defense helps mitigate Byzantine failures by allowing the server to identify and exclude malicious clients.
Plain English Explanation
Federated learning is a type of distributed machine learning where multiple devices or organizations collaborate to train a shared model without sharing their private data. However, this approach can be vulnerable to security and privacy threats, such as data poisoning attacks where malicious clients submit corrupted model updates to sabotage the training process.
To address these issues, the researchers developed two key techniques. First, update digests are used to verify the integrity of model updates before they are incorporated into the global model. This helps detect and filter out malicious updates, protecting the system from data poisoning attacks.
Second, the paper proposes a voting-based defense mechanism to identify and exclude malicious clients. The server collects multiple model updates from each client and uses a voting system to determine which updates are legitimate. This helps mitigate Byzantine failures, where some clients behave maliciously and submit corrupted updates.
By combining these two techniques, the researchers aim to enhance the security and privacy of federated learning systems, making them more robust against a variety of attacks and failures.
Technical Explanation
The paper first introduces the concept of update digests, which are cryptographic hashes of the model updates submitted by clients. The server can use these digests to efficiently verify the integrity of the updates without having to download and compare the full model parameters. This helps detect and filter out malicious updates that may have been crafted to poison the global model.
The researchers then present a voting-based defense mechanism to identify and exclude malicious clients. In this approach, the server collects multiple model updates from each client and compares them using a voting system. If a client's updates consistently deviate from the majority, they are marked as malicious and excluded from the next round of training. This helps mitigate Byzantine failures where some clients behave in unexpected or adversarial ways.
The paper includes extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed techniques in enhancing the security and privacy of federated learning systems. The results show that the combined approach of update digests and voting-based defense can significantly reduce the impact of data poisoning attacks and Byzantine failures, while maintaining the accuracy of the trained models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-designed solution to address important security and privacy challenges in federated learning. The use of update digests and voting-based defense represents a significant advancement in the field, as it helps protect against a wide range of attacks and failures.
However, the paper does not discuss the computational and communication overhead associated with these techniques. Generating and verifying update digests, as well as the voting process, may introduce additional latency and resource requirements, which could be a concern in resource-constrained environments. The researchers could explore ways to optimize these processes or provide guidelines on balancing the trade-off between security/privacy and efficiency.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential impact of the proposed techniques on the privacy of the participating clients. While the techniques aim to enhance security, they may also inadvertently expose more information about the clients' data or models. The researchers could further investigate the privacy implications and explore ways to mitigate them.
Overall, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of federated learning, offering practical solutions to enhance security and privacy. However, the implementation details and potential trade-offs should be carefully considered, and further research is needed to address the limitations mentioned above.
Conclusion
This paper introduces two novel techniques, update digests and voting-based defense, to improve the security and privacy of federated learning systems. By verifying the integrity of model updates and identifying and excluding malicious clients, the proposed methods help protect against data poisoning attacks and Byzantine failures.
The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of these techniques in maintaining the accuracy of the trained models while enhancing the overall security and privacy of the federated learning process. This work represents a significant step forward in addressing critical challenges in the deployment of federated learning, especially in sensitive domains where data privacy and model integrity are paramount.
As the adoption of federated learning continues to grow, the findings from this paper will be valuable for researchers and practitioners working to develop robust and secure distributed learning systems that can be trusted by all participants.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Enhancing Security and Privacy in Federated Learning using Update Digests and Voting-Based Defense
Wenjie Li, Kai Fan, Jingyuan Zhang, Hui Li, Wei Yang Bryan Lim, Qiang Yang
Federated Learning (FL) is a promising privacy-preserving machine learning paradigm that allows data owners to collaboratively train models while keeping their data localized. Despite its potential, FL faces challenges related to the trustworthiness of both clients and servers, especially in the presence of curious or malicious adversaries. In this paper, we introduce a novel framework named underline{textbf{F}}ederated underline{textbf{L}}earning with underline{textbf{U}}pdate underline{textbf{D}}igest (FLUD), which addresses the critical issues of privacy preservation and resistance to Byzantine attacks within distributed learning environments. FLUD utilizes an innovative approach, the $mathsf{LinfSample}$ method, allowing clients to compute the $l_{infty}$ norm across sliding windows of updates as an update digest. This digest enables the server to calculate a shared distance matrix, significantly reducing the overhead associated with Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC) by three orders of magnitude while effectively distinguishing between benign and malicious updates. Additionally, FLUD integrates a privacy-preserving, voting-based defense mechanism that employs optimized SMPC protocols to minimize communication rounds. Our comprehensive experiments demonstrate FLUD's effectiveness in countering Byzantine adversaries while incurring low communication and runtime overhead. FLUD offers a scalable framework for secure and reliable FL in distributed environments, facilitating its application in scenarios requiring robust data management and security.
Read more5/30/2024
⛏️
0
Federated Learning Privacy: Attacks, Defenses, Applications, and Policy Landscape - A Survey
Joshua C. Zhao, Saurabh Bagchi, Salman Avestimehr, Kevin S. Chan, Somali Chaterji, Dimitris Dimitriadis, Jiacheng Li, Ninghui Li, Arash Nourian, Holger R. Roth
Deep learning has shown incredible potential across a vast array of tasks and accompanying this growth has been an insatiable appetite for data. However, a large amount of data needed for enabling deep learning is stored on personal devices and recent concerns on privacy have further highlighted challenges for accessing such data. As a result, federated learning (FL) has emerged as an important privacy-preserving technology enabling collaborative training of machine learning models without the need to send the raw, potentially sensitive, data to a central server. However, the fundamental premise that sending model updates to a server is privacy-preserving only holds if the updates cannot be reverse engineered to infer information about the private training data. It has been shown under a wide variety of settings that this premise for privacy does {em not} hold. In this survey paper, we provide a comprehensive literature review of the different privacy attacks and defense methods in FL. We identify the current limitations of these attacks and highlight the settings in which FL client privacy can be broken. We dissect some of the successful industry applications of FL and draw lessons for future successful adoption. We survey the emerging landscape of privacy regulation for FL. We conclude with future directions for taking FL toward the cherished goal of generating accurate models while preserving the privacy of the data from its participants.
Read more5/7/2024
🔎
0
Mitigating Malicious Attacks in Federated Learning via Confidence-aware Defense
Qilei Li, Ahmed M. Abdelmoniem
Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning diagram that enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a global model without sharing their private local data. However, FL systems are vulnerable to attacks that are happening in malicious clients through data poisoning and model poisoning, which can deteriorate the performance of aggregated global model. Existing defense methods typically focus on mitigating specific types of poisoning and are often ineffective against unseen types of attack. These methods also assume an attack happened moderately while is not always holds true in real. Consequently, these methods can significantly fail in terms of accuracy and robustness when detecting and addressing updates from attacked malicious clients. To overcome these challenges, in this work, we propose a simple yet effective framework to detect malicious clients, namely Confidence-Aware Defense (CAD), that utilizes the confidence scores of local models as criteria to evaluate the reliability of local updates. Our key insight is that malicious attacks, regardless of attack type, will cause the model to deviate from its previous state, thus leading to increased uncertainty when making predictions. Therefore, CAD is comprehensively effective for both model poisoning and data poisoning attacks by accurately identifying and mitigating potential malicious updates, even under varying degrees of attacks and data heterogeneity. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly enhances the robustness of FL systems against various types of attacks across various scenarios by achieving higher model accuracy and stability.
Read more8/20/2024
0
Fed-Credit: Robust Federated Learning with Credibility Management
Jiayan Chen, Zhirong Qian, Tianhui Meng, Xitong Gao, Tian Wang, Weijia Jia
Aiming at privacy preservation, Federated Learning (FL) is an emerging machine learning approach enabling model training on decentralized devices or data sources. The learning mechanism of FL relies on aggregating parameter updates from individual clients. However, this process may pose a potential security risk due to the presence of malicious devices. Existing solutions are either costly due to the use of compute-intensive technology, or restrictive for reasons of strong assumptions such as the prior knowledge of the number of attackers and how they attack. Few methods consider both privacy constraints and uncertain attack scenarios. In this paper, we propose a robust FL approach based on the credibility management scheme, called Fed-Credit. Unlike previous studies, our approach does not require prior knowledge of the nodes and the data distribution. It maintains and employs a credibility set, which weighs the historical clients' contributions based on the similarity between the local models and global model, to adjust the global model update. The subtlety of Fed-Credit is that the time decay and attitudinal value factor are incorporated into the dynamic adjustment of the reputation weights and it boasts a computational complexity of O(n) (n is the number of the clients). We conducted extensive experiments on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets under 5 types of attacks. The results exhibit superior accuracy and resilience against adversarial attacks, all while maintaining comparatively low computational complexity. Among these, on the Non-IID CIFAR-10 dataset, our algorithm exhibited performance enhancements of 19.5% and 14.5%, respectively, in comparison to the state-of-the-art algorithm when dealing with two types of data poisoning attacks.
Read more5/21/2024