Estimating large causal polytrees from small samples

Read original: arXiv:2209.07028 - Published 8/20/2024 by Sourav Chatterjee, Mathukumalli Vidyasagar
Total Score

0

🎲

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper addresses the problem of estimating a large causal polytree from a relatively small sample of data.
  • This is important for determining causal structure in areas like gene regulatory networks, where the number of variables is much larger than the available sample size.
  • The authors propose an algorithm that can accurately recover the causal tree structure in such settings, with few distributional or modeling assumptions.

Plain English Explanation

The research paper focuses on a challenging problem in causal inference: estimating a large causal polytree from a relatively small dataset. A causal polytree is a type of causal model that represents how different variables are causally related to each other in a tree-like structure.

This problem is particularly relevant in fields like gene regulatory networks, where the number of variables (genes) is vastly larger than the available sample size (experimental observations). Determining the causal relationships between genes is crucial for understanding biological processes, but it's difficult to do with limited data.

The authors present an algorithm that can accurately recover the causal polytree structure in these data-scarce scenarios. Importantly, their approach makes very few assumptions about the underlying distribution of the data or the specific causal model. As long as some basic non-degeneracy conditions are met, the algorithm can reliably estimate the causal structure.

Technical Explanation

The key idea behind the authors' approach is to leverage the tree-like structure of the causal polytree to efficiently estimate the model parameters from limited data. They propose an algorithm that:

  1. First identifies the variables that are most likely to be direct causes of each target variable, based on conditional independence tests.
  2. Then, using these parent-child relationships, the algorithm reconstructs the full causal polytree structure.

Crucially, the algorithm works without making strong assumptions about the data distribution or the specific functional form of the causal relationships. As long as the causal model satisfies some mild non-degeneracy conditions, the algorithm can accurately recover the tree structure with high probability, even when the sample size is small compared to the number of variables.

The authors provide theoretical guarantees on the performance of their algorithm, as well as experimental validation on both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge several limitations of their approach. First, the algorithm assumes the causal model takes the form of a polytree, which may not always be the case in real-world systems. Extensions to more general causal graph structures would be valuable.

Additionally, the non-degeneracy conditions required by the algorithm, while relatively weak, may still be violated in some practical scenarios. Further research is needed to relax these assumptions or develop more robust algorithms.

Another potential issue is the scalability of the approach, as the computational complexity grows with the number of variables. Strategies to improve the efficiency of the algorithm or make it amenable to parallelization could expand its applicability to even larger-scale problems.

Despite these limitations, the authors' work represents an important step forward in causal representation learning from limited data, with potential applications in various domains where causal discovery is crucial but samples are scarce.

Conclusion

This research paper presents a novel algorithm for estimating large causal polytrees from a relatively small dataset. By leveraging the tree-like structure of the causal model and making minimal distributional assumptions, the algorithm can accurately recover the causal relationships, even in settings where the number of variables greatly exceeds the available sample size.

The authors' work contributes to the broader field of causal discovery, with potential applications in areas like gene regulatory networks, where understanding complex causal structures is crucial for advancing scientific knowledge and informing decision-making.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🎲

Total Score

0

Estimating large causal polytrees from small samples

Sourav Chatterjee, Mathukumalli Vidyasagar

We consider the problem of estimating a large causal polytree from a relatively small i.i.d. sample. This is motivated by the problem of determining causal structure when the number of variables is very large compared to the sample size, such as in gene regulatory networks. We give an algorithm that recovers the tree with high accuracy in such settings. The algorithm works under essentially no distributional or modeling assumptions other than some mild non-degeneracy conditions.

Read more

8/20/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Learning Linear Polytree Structural Equation Models

Xingmei Lou, Yu Hu, Xiaodong Li

We are interested in the problem of learning the directed acyclic graph (DAG) when data are generated from a linear structural equation model (SEM) and the causal structure can be characterized by a polytree. Under the Gaussian polytree models, we study sufficient conditions on the sample sizes for the well-known Chow-Liu algorithm to exactly recover both the skeleton and the equivalence class of the polytree, which is uniquely represented by a CPDAG. On the other hand, necessary conditions on the required sample sizes for both skeleton and CPDAG recovery are also derived in terms of information-theoretic lower bounds, which match the respective sufficient conditions and thereby give a sharp characterization of the difficulty of these tasks. We also consider the problem of inverse correlation matrix estimation under the linear polytree models, and establish the estimation error bound in terms of the dimension and the total number of v-structures. We also consider an extension of group linear polytree models, in which each node represents a group of variables. Our theoretical findings are illustrated by comprehensive numerical simulations, and experiments on benchmark data also demonstrate the robustness of polytree learning when the true graphical structures can only be approximated by polytrees.

Read more

5/15/2024

🤷

Total Score

0

Sample, estimate, aggregate: A recipe for causal discovery foundation models

Menghua Wu, Yujia Bao, Regina Barzilay, Tommi Jaakkola

Causal discovery, the task of inferring causal structure from data, promises to accelerate scientific research, inform policy making, and more. However, causal discovery algorithms over larger sets of variables tend to be brittle against misspecification or when data are limited. To mitigate these challenges, we train a supervised model that learns to predict a larger causal graph from the outputs of classical causal discovery algorithms run over subsets of variables, along with other statistical hints like inverse covariance. Our approach is enabled by the observation that typical errors in the outputs of classical methods remain comparable across datasets. Theoretically, we show that this model is well-specified, in the sense that it can recover a causal graph consistent with graphs over subsets. Empirically, we train the model to be robust to erroneous estimates using diverse synthetic data. Experiments on real and synthetic data demonstrate that this model maintains high accuracy in the face of misspecification or distribution shift, and can be adapted at low cost to different discovery algorithms or choice of statistics.

Read more

5/24/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

GRACE-C: Generalized Rate Agnostic Causal Estimation via Constraints

Mohammadsajad Abavisani, David Danks, Sergey Plis

Graphical structures estimated by causal learning algorithms from time series data can provide misleading causal information if the causal timescale of the generating process fails to match the measurement timescale of the data. Existing algorithms provide limited resources to respond to this challenge, and so researchers must either use models that they know are likely misleading, or else forego causal learning entirely. Existing methods face up-to-four distinct shortfalls, as they might 1) require that the difference between causal and measurement timescales is known; 2) only handle very small number of random variables when the timescale difference is unknown; 3) only apply to pairs of variables; or 4) be unable to find a solution given statistical noise in the data. This research addresses these challenges. Our approach combines constraint programming with both theoretical insights into the problem structure and prior information about admissible causal interactions to achieve multiple orders of magnitude in speed-up. The resulting system maintains theoretical guarantees while scaling to significantly larger sets of random variables (>100) without knowledge of timescale differences. This method is also robust to edge misidentification and can use parametric connection strengths, while optionally finding the optimal solution among many possible ones.

Read more

5/22/2024