Metron: Holistic Performance Evaluation Framework for LLM Inference Systems

Read original: arXiv:2407.07000 - Published 9/2/2024 by Amey Agrawal, Anmol Agarwal, Nitin Kedia, Jayashree Mohan, Souvik Kundu, Nipun Kwatra, Ramachandran Ramjee, Alexey Tumanov
Total Score

0

Metron: Holistic Performance Evaluation Framework for LLM Inference Systems

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Metron is a holistic performance evaluation framework for large language model (LLM) inference systems.
  • It aims to provide a comprehensive and standardized way to assess the performance of LLMs across various dimensions, including accuracy, latency, energy consumption, and fairness.
  • The framework integrates multiple evaluation metrics and tests to give a more complete picture of an LLM's capabilities and tradeoffs.

Plain English Explanation

Metron is a tool that helps researchers and developers evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in a more complete and standardized way. LLMs are a type of artificial intelligence that can generate human-like text, answer questions, and perform other language-related tasks.

Rather than just focusing on a single metric like accuracy, Metron looks at the performance of LLMs across multiple dimensions, such as how quickly they can respond, how much energy they use, and how fair and unbiased their outputs are. By considering these different factors, Metron can give a more holistic view of an LLM's capabilities and trade-offs.

This is important because real-world applications of LLMs often involve balancing various performance goals, and a tool like Metron can help developers and researchers make more informed decisions about which LLM to use for their specific needs.

Technical Explanation

Metron is a comprehensive framework for evaluating the performance of large language model (LLM) inference systems. It integrates multiple evaluation metrics and tests to assess an LLM's accuracy, latency, energy consumption, and fairness.

The framework consists of several key components:

  1. Accuracy Evaluation: Metron includes a suite of standardized benchmarks and datasets to measure an LLM's performance on a variety of language tasks, such as text classification, question answering, and text generation.

  2. Latency Measurement: Metron can track the response time of an LLM under different workloads and system configurations, allowing developers to optimize for low-latency applications.

  3. Energy Consumption Analysis: The framework measures the energy usage of an LLM during inference, enabling developers to make informed trade-offs between performance and energy efficiency.

  4. Fairness Assessment: Metron includes tests to evaluate an LLM's fairness and bias across various demographic attributes, addressing concerns about the ethical use of LLMs.

By providing a standardized and comprehensive approach to LLM evaluation, Metron aims to enhance trust in LLMs and enable more informed decision-making during the development and deployment of these powerful AI systems.

Critical Analysis

The Metron framework addresses an important need in the field of large language model (LLM) development and deployment. By considering multiple performance metrics, it provides a more holistic view of an LLM's capabilities and trade-offs, which is crucial for real-world applications.

One potential limitation of Metron is the challenge of keeping up with the rapid pace of LLM development. As new models and architectures emerge, the framework may need to be continuously updated to include relevant benchmarks and evaluation methods.

Additionally, while Metron's fairness assessment is a crucial component, there are ongoing debates and challenges around defining and measuring fairness in complex AI systems. The framework may need to evolve as the field of AI ethics and fairness continues to progress.

Further research could explore the integration of Metron with other LLM evaluation tools and frameworks, such as METAL and Metric-Aware LLM Inference, to create a more comprehensive and interoperable ecosystem for LLM evaluation.

Conclusion

Metron is a valuable framework that takes a holistic approach to evaluating the performance of large language models (LLMs). By integrating multiple evaluation metrics and tests, it provides a more comprehensive and standardized way to assess an LLM's accuracy, latency, energy consumption, and fairness.

This is an important development in the field of LLM research and deployment, as it can help developers and researchers make more informed decisions about which models to use for their specific applications and requirements. By enhancing trust and transparency in LLMs, Metron has the potential to contribute to the responsible and ethical development of these powerful AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Metron: Holistic Performance Evaluation Framework for LLM Inference Systems
Total Score

0

Metron: Holistic Performance Evaluation Framework for LLM Inference Systems

Amey Agrawal, Anmol Agarwal, Nitin Kedia, Jayashree Mohan, Souvik Kundu, Nipun Kwatra, Ramachandran Ramjee, Alexey Tumanov

Serving large language models (LLMs) in production can incur substantial costs, which has prompted recent advances in inference system optimizations. Today, these systems are evaluated against conventional latency and throughput metrics (eg. TTFT, TBT, Normalised Latency and TPOT). However, these metrics fail to fully capture the nuances of LLM inference, leading to an incomplete assessment of user-facing performance crucial for real-time applications such as chat and translation. In this paper, we first identify the pitfalls of current performance metrics in evaluating LLM inference systems. We then propose Etalon, a comprehensive performance evaluation framework that includes fluidity-index -- a novel metric designed to reflect the intricacies of the LLM inference process and its impact on real-time user experience. Finally, we evaluate various existing open-source platforms and model-as-a-service offerings using Etalon, discussing their strengths and weaknesses. Etalon is available at https://github.com/project-etalon/etalon.

Read more

9/2/2024

METAL: Towards Multilingual Meta-Evaluation
Total Score

0

METAL: Towards Multilingual Meta-Evaluation

Rishav Hada, Varun Gumma, Mohamed Ahmed, Kalika Bali, Sunayana Sitaram

With the rising human-like precision of Large Language Models (LLMs) in numerous tasks, their utilization in a variety of real-world applications is becoming more prevalent. Several studies have shown that LLMs excel on many standard NLP benchmarks. However, it is challenging to evaluate LLMs due to test dataset contamination and the limitations of traditional metrics. Since human evaluations are difficult to collect, there is a growing interest in the community to use LLMs themselves as reference-free evaluators for subjective metrics. However, past work has shown that LLM-based evaluators can exhibit bias and have poor alignment with human judgments. In this study, we propose a framework for an end-to-end assessment of LLMs as evaluators in multilingual scenarios. We create a carefully curated dataset, covering 10 languages containing native speaker judgments for the task of summarization. This dataset is created specifically to evaluate LLM-based evaluators, which we refer to as meta-evaluation (METAL). We compare the performance of LLM-based evaluators created using GPT-3.5-Turbo, GPT-4, and PaLM2. Our results indicate that LLM-based evaluators based on GPT-4 perform the best across languages, while GPT-3.5-Turbo performs poorly. Additionally, we perform an analysis of the reasoning provided by LLM-based evaluators and find that it often does not match the reasoning provided by human judges.

Read more

4/3/2024

MetaLLM: A High-performant and Cost-efficient Dynamic Framework for Wrapping LLMs
Total Score

0

MetaLLM: A High-performant and Cost-efficient Dynamic Framework for Wrapping LLMs

Quang H. Nguyen, Duy C. Hoang, Juliette Decugis, Saurav Manchanda, Nitesh V. Chawla, Khoa D. Doan

The rapid progress in machine learning (ML) has brought forth many large language models (LLMs) that excel in various tasks and areas. These LLMs come with different abilities and costs in terms of computation or pricing. Since the demand for each query can vary, e.g., because of the queried domain or its complexity, defaulting to one LLM in an application is not usually the best choice, whether it is the biggest, priciest, or even the one with the best average test performance. Consequently, picking the right LLM that is both accurate and cost-effective for an application remains a challenge. In this paper, we introduce MetaLLM, a framework that dynamically and intelligently routes each query to the optimal LLM (among several available LLMs) for classification tasks, achieving significantly improved accuracy and cost-effectiveness. By framing the selection problem as a multi-armed bandit, MetaLLM balances prediction accuracy and cost efficiency under uncertainty. Our experiments, conducted on popular LLM platforms such as OpenAI's GPT models, Amazon's Titan, Anthropic's Claude, and Meta's LLaMa, showcase MetaLLM's efficacy in real-world scenarios, laying the groundwork for future extensions beyond classification tasks.

Read more

7/25/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Benchmarks as Microscopes: A Call for Model Metrology

Michael Saxon, Ari Holtzman, Peter West, William Yang Wang, Naomi Saphra

Modern language models (LMs) pose a new challenge in capability assessment. Static benchmarks inevitably saturate without providing confidence in the deployment tolerances of LM-based systems, but developers nonetheless claim that their models have generalized traits such as reasoning or open-domain language understanding based on these flawed metrics. The science and practice of LMs requires a new approach to benchmarking which measures specific capabilities with dynamic assessments. To be confident in our metrics, we need a new discipline of model metrology -- one which focuses on how to generate benchmarks that predict performance under deployment. Motivated by our evaluation criteria, we outline how building a community of model metrology practitioners -- one focused on building tools and studying how to measure system capabilities -- is the best way to meet these needs to and add clarity to the AI discussion.

Read more

7/31/2024