Evaluating Multiview Object Consistency in Humans and Image Models

Read original: arXiv:2409.05862 - Published 9/11/2024 by Tyler Bonnen, Stephanie Fu, Yutong Bai, Thomas O'Connell, Yoni Friedman, Nancy Kanwisher, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Alexei A. Efros
Total Score

0

Evaluating Multiview Object Consistency in Humans and Image Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Researchers conducted experiments to evaluate how well image models can recognize objects from different viewpoints, compared to human perception.
  • They collected data on human judgments of object consistency across views, and tested various deep learning models on the same task.
  • The study provides insights into the strengths and limitations of current AI vision systems in understanding 3D object representations.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers wanted to understand how well current artificial intelligence (AI) image recognition models can perceive the consistency of 3D objects across different viewpoints, and how this compares to human perception.

To do this, they asked people to judge whether pairs of images showed the same 3D object from different angles. They then tested various deep learning models - AI systems trained on large datasets of images - on the same task.

By comparing the human judgments to the model predictions, the researchers could see where the AI systems succeeded or struggled in understanding the 3D properties of objects. This provides insights into the strengths and limitations of current AI vision technology, and how it differs from the human visual system.

The findings suggest that while AI models can recognize objects quite well in many cases, they still have difficulty fully capturing the 3D nature of objects and maintaining consistency across different viewpoints, something that comes more naturally to humans. This highlights important aspects of object recognition that AI systems need to continue improving on.

Technical Explanation

The researchers designed experiments to evaluate multiview object consistency in humans and AI image models. They collected human judgments on whether pairs of images depicted the same 3D object from different viewpoints. They then tested various deep learning models for 3D object recognition on the same task.

By comparing the human and model performance, the researchers gained insights into the strengths and limitations of current AI vision systems in understanding 3D object representations. The findings suggest that while models can perform well on many object recognition tasks, they still struggle to fully capture the 3D nature of objects and maintain consistency across viewpoints, which comes more naturally to humans.

This work contributes to the broader effort to develop AI vision models more aligned with human visual perception and build robust foundation models for human-like object understanding.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful and rigorous evaluation of how well current AI image models can handle 3D object recognition compared to human perception. The experimental design and data collection methods seem well-conceived, and the analysis of the results is thorough.

One potential limitation is that the study only tested a limited set of deep learning models, and the performance could differ for other state-of-the-art architectures. Additionally, the study focused on static 2D images, while human object recognition often relies on dynamic, multi-sensory information. Further research could explore how 3D object consistency is perceived and modeled across richer perceptual inputs.

Overall, this work highlights important gaps between human and machine vision that deserve continued research attention. Addressing these gaps could lead to more robust and human-aligned AI systems for 3D object recognition and understanding.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the current capabilities and limitations of AI image models in recognizing 3D object consistency across different viewpoints. By benchmarking model performance against human judgments, the researchers identified key areas where AI systems still struggle compared to human visual perception.

These findings contribute to the ongoing effort to develop AI vision models that can better capture the 3D nature of objects and align more closely with human-like understanding. Continued progress in this direction could lead to significant advancements in areas like robotics, augmented reality, and general-purpose computer vision systems that can interact with the physical world more effectively.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Evaluating Multiview Object Consistency in Humans and Image Models
Total Score

0

Evaluating Multiview Object Consistency in Humans and Image Models

Tyler Bonnen, Stephanie Fu, Yutong Bai, Thomas O'Connell, Yoni Friedman, Nancy Kanwisher, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Alexei A. Efros

We introduce a benchmark to directly evaluate the alignment between human observers and vision models on a 3D shape inference task. We leverage an experimental design from the cognitive sciences which requires zero-shot visual inferences about object shape: given a set of images, participants identify which contain the same/different objects, despite considerable viewpoint variation. We draw from a diverse range of images that include common objects (e.g., chairs) as well as abstract shapes (i.e., procedurally generated `nonsense' objects). After constructing over 2000 unique image sets, we administer these tasks to human participants, collecting 35K trials of behavioral data from over 500 participants. This includes explicit choice behaviors as well as intermediate measures, such as reaction time and gaze data. We then evaluate the performance of common vision models (e.g., DINOv2, MAE, CLIP). We find that humans outperform all models by a wide margin. Using a multi-scale evaluation approach, we identify underlying similarities and differences between models and humans: while human-model performance is correlated, humans allocate more time/processing on challenging trials. All images, data, and code can be accessed via our project page.

Read more

9/11/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

MV-CLIP: Multi-View CLIP for Zero-shot 3D Shape Recognition

Dan Song, Xinwei Fu, Ning Liu, Weizhi Nie, Wenhui Li, Lanjun Wang, You Yang, Anan Liu

Large-scale pre-trained models have demonstrated impressive performance in vision and language tasks within open-world scenarios. Due to the lack of comparable pre-trained models for 3D shapes, recent methods utilize language-image pre-training to realize zero-shot 3D shape recognition. However, due to the modality gap, pretrained language-image models are not confident enough in the generalization to 3D shape recognition. Consequently, this paper aims to improve the confidence with view selection and hierarchical prompts. Leveraging the CLIP model as an example, we employ view selection on the vision side by identifying views with high prediction confidence from multiple rendered views of a 3D shape. On the textual side, the strategy of hierarchical prompts is proposed for the first time. The first layer prompts several classification candidates with traditional class-level descriptions, while the second layer refines the prediction based on function-level descriptions or further distinctions between the candidates. Remarkably, without the need for additional training, our proposed method achieves impressive zero-shot 3D classification accuracies of 84.44%, 91.51%, and 66.17% on ModelNet40, ModelNet10, and ShapeNet Core55, respectively. Furthermore, we will make the code publicly available to facilitate reproducibility and further research in this area.

Read more

9/12/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Deep Models for Multi-View 3D Object Recognition: A Review

Mona Alzahrani, Muhammad Usman, Salma Kammoun, Saeed Anwar, Tarek Helmy

Human decision-making often relies on visual information from multiple perspectives or views. In contrast, machine learning-based object recognition utilizes information from a single image of the object. However, the information conveyed by a single image may not be sufficient for accurate decision-making, particularly in complex recognition problems. The utilization of multi-view 3D representations for object recognition has thus far demonstrated the most promising results for achieving state-of-the-art performance. This review paper comprehensively covers recent progress in multi-view 3D object recognition methods for 3D classification and retrieval tasks. Specifically, we focus on deep learning-based and transformer-based techniques, as they are widely utilized and have achieved state-of-the-art performance. We provide detailed information about existing deep learning-based and transformer-based multi-view 3D object recognition models, including the most commonly used 3D datasets, camera configurations and number of views, view selection strategies, pre-trained CNN architectures, fusion strategies, and recognition performance on 3D classification and 3D retrieval tasks. Additionally, we examine various computer vision applications that use multi-view classification. Finally, we highlight key findings and future directions for developing multi-view 3D object recognition methods to provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of the field.

Read more

4/24/2024

Aligning Vision Models with Human Aesthetics in Retrieval: Benchmarks and Algorithms
Total Score

0

Aligning Vision Models with Human Aesthetics in Retrieval: Benchmarks and Algorithms

Miaosen Zhang, Yixuan Wei, Zhen Xing, Yifei Ma, Zuxuan Wu, Ji Li, Zheng Zhang, Qi Dai, Chong Luo, Xin Geng, Baining Guo

Modern vision models are trained on very large noisy datasets. While these models acquire strong capabilities, they may not follow the user's intent to output the desired results in certain aspects, e.g., visual aesthetic, preferred style, and responsibility. In this paper, we target the realm of visual aesthetics and aim to align vision models with human aesthetic standards in a retrieval system. Advanced retrieval systems usually adopt a cascade of aesthetic models as re-rankers or filters, which are limited to low-level features like saturation and perform poorly when stylistic, cultural or knowledge contexts are involved. We find that utilizing the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs) to rephrase the search query and extend the aesthetic expectations can make up for this shortcoming. Based on the above findings, we propose a preference-based reinforcement learning method that fine-tunes the vision models to distill the knowledge from both LLMs reasoning and the aesthetic models to better align the vision models with human aesthetics. Meanwhile, with rare benchmarks designed for evaluating retrieval systems, we leverage large multi-modality model (LMM) to evaluate the aesthetic performance with their strong abilities. As aesthetic assessment is one of the most subjective tasks, to validate the robustness of LMM, we further propose a novel dataset named HPIR to benchmark the alignment with human aesthetics. Experiments demonstrate that our method significantly enhances the aesthetic behaviors of the vision models, under several metrics. We believe the proposed algorithm can be a general practice for aligning vision models with human values.

Read more

6/14/2024