Evaluating the Robustness of Deep-Learning Algorithm-Selection Models by Evolving Adversarial Instances
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the robustness of deep learning models used for algorithm selection by evolving adversarial instances, which are inputs designed to fool the models.
- The researchers develop a framework to generate adversarial instances that target algorithm selection models, and evaluate the robustness of several deep learning models on benchmark combinatorial optimization problems.
- The findings provide insights into the vulnerabilities of these models and suggest approaches to improve their robustness against adversarial attacks.
Plain English Explanation
Deep learning models are increasingly being used to help select the best algorithms for solving complex optimization problems, like finding the most efficient route for a delivery truck. However, these models can be vulnerable to "adversarial" inputs - small, carefully crafted changes to the input data that can trick the model into making incorrect decisions.
In this paper, the researchers developed a way to automatically generate these adversarial inputs for algorithm selection models. They then used this technique to evaluate the robustness of several deep learning models on standard optimization problems. The key finding is that these models can be quite fragile - even small perturbations to the input data can cause them to make poor algorithm choices.
This work is important because it helps us understand the limitations of current deep learning approaches for algorithm selection. By knowing where these models are vulnerable, we can work on improving their robustness and making them more reliable for real-world applications. The paper on impact of architectural modifications and the survey on transferability of adversarial examples provide additional insights into these important issues.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a framework to generate adversarial instances that target deep learning models for algorithm selection. They formulated the problem as a bi-level optimization task, where the outer loop evolves adversarial perturbations to the input data, and the inner loop trains the target algorithm selection model.
They evaluated several deep learning architectures, including multilayer perceptrons and graph neural networks, on benchmark combinatorial optimization problems like the Traveling Salesman Problem. The results showed that even small adversarial perturbations could cause significant degradation in the models' performance, demonstrating their lack of robustness.
The researchers also explored strategies to improve the models' robustness, such as adversarial training and architectural modifications. Their findings align with related work, like the study on the double-edged sword of input perturbations and the research on breaking safety guardrails, which highlight the challenges in building truly robust deep learning systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive study of the vulnerabilities of deep learning models for algorithm selection, but it also has some limitations. The researchers focused on a relatively narrow set of optimization problems, and it's unclear how well their findings would generalize to other domains or real-world applications.
Additionally, the proposed framework for generating adversarial instances is computationally intensive, which may limit its practical usefulness. The study on the impact of architectural modifications suggests that simpler architectural changes could be more effective for improving robustness.
The paper also does not explore the mechanisms by which these models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Understanding the underlying causes could lead to more principled approaches for improving robustness, as highlighted in the research on robust image classification.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution by exposing the fragility of deep learning models used for algorithm selection. The researchers' framework for generating adversarial instances provides a valuable tool for evaluating the robustness of these models, and their findings suggest that significant work is needed to make them reliable for real-world applications.
The insights from this work, combined with related research on adversarial robustness, highlight the need for a deeper understanding of the vulnerabilities of deep learning systems. Addressing these challenges will be crucial for realizing the full potential of AI-powered decision-making tools in fields like combinatorial optimization.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Evaluating the Robustness of Deep-Learning Algorithm-Selection Models by Evolving Adversarial Instances
Emma Hart, Quentin Renau, Kevin Sim, Mohamad Alissa
Deep neural networks (DNN) are increasingly being used to perform algorithm-selection in combinatorial optimisation domains, particularly as they accommodate input representations which avoid designing and calculating features. Mounting evidence from domains that use images as input shows that deep convolutional networks are vulnerable to adversarial samples, in which a small perturbation of an instance can cause the DNN to misclassify. However, it remains unknown as to whether deep recurrent networks (DRN) which have recently been shown promise as algorithm-selectors in the bin-packing domain are equally vulnerable. We use an evolutionary algorithm (EA) to find perturbations of instances from two existing benchmarks for online bin packing that cause trained DRNs to misclassify: adversarial samples are successfully generated from up to 56% of the original instances depending on the dataset. Analysis of the new misclassified instances sheds light on the `fragility' of some training instances, i.e. instances where it is trivial to find a small perturbation that results in a misclassification and the factors that influence this. Finally, the method generates a large number of new instances misclassified with a wide variation in confidence, providing a rich new source of training data to create more robust models.
Read more6/26/2024
🤿
0
New!On the Similarity of Deep Learning Representations Across Didactic and Adversarial Examples
Pk Douglas, Farzad Vasheghani Farahani
The increasing use of deep neural networks (DNNs) has motivated a parallel endeavor: the design of adversaries that profit from successful misclassifications. However, not all adversarial examples are crafted for malicious purposes. For example, real world systems often contain physical, temporal, and sampling variability across instrumentation. Adversarial examples in the wild may inadvertently prove deleterious for accurate predictive modeling. Conversely, naturally occurring covariance of image features may serve didactic purposes. Here, we studied the stability of deep learning representations for neuroimaging classification across didactic and adversarial conditions characteristic of MRI acquisition variability. We show that representational similarity and performance vary according to the frequency of adversarial examples in the input space.
Read more9/18/2024
0
The Double-Edged Sword of Input Perturbations to Robust Accurate Fairness
Xuran Li, Peng Wu, Yanting Chen, Xingjun Ma, Zhen Zhang, Kaixiang Dong
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are known to be sensitive to adversarial input perturbations, leading to a reduction in either prediction accuracy or individual fairness. To jointly characterize the susceptibility of prediction accuracy and individual fairness to adversarial perturbations, we introduce a novel robustness definition termed robust accurate fairness. Informally, robust accurate fairness requires that predictions for an instance and its similar counterparts consistently align with the ground truth when subjected to input perturbations. We propose an adversarial attack approach dubbed RAFair to expose false or biased adversarial defects in DNN, which either deceive accuracy or compromise individual fairness. Then, we show that such adversarial instances can be effectively addressed by carefully designed benign perturbations, correcting their predictions to be accurate and fair. Our work explores the double-edged sword of input perturbations to robust accurate fairness in DNN and the potential of using benign perturbations to correct adversarial instances.
Read more4/3/2024
0
EvolBA: Evolutionary Boundary Attack under Hard-label Black Box condition
Ayane Tajima, Satoshi Ono
Research has shown that deep neural networks (DNNs) have vulnerabilities that can lead to the misrecognition of Adversarial Examples (AEs) with specifically designed perturbations. Various adversarial attack methods have been proposed to detect vulnerabilities under hard-label black box (HL-BB) conditions in the absence of loss gradients and confidence scores.However, these methods fall into local solutions because they search only local regions of the search space. Therefore, this study proposes an adversarial attack method named EvolBA to generate AEs using Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) under the HL-BB condition, where only a class label predicted by the target DNN model is available. Inspired by formula-driven supervised learning, the proposed method introduces domain-independent operators for the initialization process and a jump that enhances search exploration. Experimental results confirmed that the proposed method could determine AEs with smaller perturbations than previous methods in images where the previous methods have difficulty.
Read more7/10/2024