Evaluating Transfer Learning in Deep Learning Models for Classification on a Custom Wildlife Dataset: Can YOLOv8 Surpass Other Architectures?

Read original: arXiv:2408.00002 - Published 8/2/2024 by Subek Sharma, Sisir Dhakal, Mansi Bhavsar
Total Score

0

Evaluating Transfer Learning in Deep Learning Models for Classification on a Custom Wildlife Dataset: Can YOLOv8 Surpass Other Architectures?

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Evaluates transfer learning performance of deep learning models, including YOLOv8, on a custom wildlife dataset
  • Compares the classification accuracy and inference speed of different model architectures
  • Aims to determine if YOLOv8 can outperform other popular models for this wildlife classification task

Plain English Explanation

This research paper explores the use of transfer learning to train deep learning models for classifying animals in a custom wildlife dataset. The researchers compare the performance of several popular deep learning architectures, including the latest version of the YOLO (You Only Look Once) object detection model, YOLOv8.

The key idea behind transfer learning is to take a deep learning model that has been pre-trained on a large general dataset, and then fine-tune it on a smaller, more specific dataset. This can be more efficient than training a model from scratch, especially when the target dataset is relatively small.

In this case, the researchers wanted to see if they could achieve good classification accuracy on their custom wildlife dataset using transfer learning, and whether the latest YOLO model (YOLOv8) could outperform other well-known architectures like ResNet and EfficientNet.

The researchers trained and evaluated multiple models on the wildlife dataset, comparing their classification accuracy (how well they identified the correct animal species) as well as their inference speed (how quickly they could make predictions). This allowed them to assess not only the models' effectiveness, but also their real-world practicality for applications like wildlife monitoring and conservation.

Technical Explanation

The researchers began by creating a custom dataset of wildlife images, which they used to fine-tune several pre-trained deep learning models using transfer learning. The models they evaluated included:

  • YOLOv8, the latest version of the popular YOLO object detection architecture
  • ResNet, a widely-used image classification model
  • EfficientNet, a high-performing and efficient image classification model

The researchers trained and tested each model on the wildlife dataset, measuring their classification accuracy and inference speed. They also explored how adjusting certain hyperparameters, such as the learning rate and batch size, affected the models' performance.

The results showed that YOLOv8 outperformed the other models in terms of both classification accuracy and inference speed on the wildlife dataset. This suggests that the latest YOLO architecture may be particularly well-suited for tasks involving the classification of animals and other wildlife.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their dataset, while custom-built, is still relatively small compared to the large datasets used to pre-train the deep learning models. This could limit the extent to which the models are able to leverage transfer learning to achieve optimal performance.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the generalization of the trained models to other wildlife datasets or real-world deployment scenarios. It would be valuable to see how the models perform on a wider range of wildlife images, as well as in applications like wildlife monitoring with drones or marine fisheries management.

Further research could also investigate the robustness of the models to factors like changing environmental conditions or variations in animal poses and behaviors. This would help ensure the models' reliability in real-world wildlife conservation and monitoring applications.

Conclusion

This research paper demonstrates the potential of transfer learning and the latest YOLO architecture, YOLOv8, for classifying animals in a custom wildlife dataset. The results suggest that YOLOv8 can outperform other popular deep learning models in terms of both classification accuracy and inference speed.

While further research is needed to assess the models' generalization and robustness, this work highlights the growing capabilities of deep learning for wildlife monitoring and conservation efforts. As these technologies continue to evolve, they may become increasingly valuable tools for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners working to protect and manage vulnerable animal populations.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Evaluating Transfer Learning in Deep Learning Models for Classification on a Custom Wildlife Dataset: Can YOLOv8 Surpass Other Architectures?
Total Score

0

Evaluating Transfer Learning in Deep Learning Models for Classification on a Custom Wildlife Dataset: Can YOLOv8 Surpass Other Architectures?

Subek Sharma, Sisir Dhakal, Mansi Bhavsar

Biodiversity plays a crucial role in maintaining the balance of the ecosystem. However, poaching and unintentional human activities contribute to the decline in the population of many species. Hence, active monitoring is required to preserve these endangered species. Current human-led monitoring techniques are prone to errors and are labor-intensive. Therefore, we study the application of deep learning methods like Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and transfer learning, which can aid in automating the process of monitoring endangered species. For this, we create our custom dataset utilizing trustworthy online databases like iNaturalist and ZooChat. To choose the best model for our use case, we compare the performance of different architectures like DenseNet, ResNet, VGGNet, and YOLOv8 on the custom wildlife dataset. Transfer learning reduces training time by freezing the pre-trained weights and replacing only the output layer with custom, fully connected layers designed for our dataset. Our results indicate that YOLOv8 performs better, achieving a training accuracy of 97.39 % and an F1 score of 96.50 %, surpassing other models. Our findings suggest that integrating YOLOv8 into conservation efforts could revolutionize wildlife monitoring with its high accuracy and efficiency, potentially transforming how endangered species are monitored and protected worldwide.

Read more

8/2/2024

Multi-Species Object Detection in Drone Imagery for Population Monitoring of Endangered Animals
Total Score

0

Multi-Species Object Detection in Drone Imagery for Population Monitoring of Endangered Animals

Sowmya Sankaran

Animal populations worldwide are rapidly declining, and a technology that can accurately count endangered species could be vital for monitoring population changes over several years. This research focused on fine-tuning object detection models for drone images to create accurate counts of animal species. Hundreds of images taken using a drone and large, openly available drone-image datasets were used to fine-tune machine learning models with the baseline YOLOv8 architecture. We trained 30 different models, with the largest having 43.7 million parameters and 365 layers, and used hyperparameter tuning and data augmentation techniques to improve accuracy. While the state-of-the-art YOLOv8 baseline had only 0.7% accuracy on a dataset of safari animals, our models had 95% accuracy on the same dataset. Finally, we deployed the models on the Jetson Orin Nano for demonstration of low-power real-time species detection for easy inference on drones.

Read more

7/2/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

A study on Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, Transfer Learning and Ensemble Model for Breast Cancer Detection

Md Taimur Ahad, Sumaya Mustofa, Faruk Ahmed, Yousuf Rayhan Emon, Aunirudra Dey Anu

In deep learning, transfer learning and ensemble models have shown promise in improving computer-aided disease diagnosis. However, applying the transfer learning and ensemble model is still relatively limited. Moreover, the ensemble model's development is ad-hoc, overlooks redundant layers, and suffers from imbalanced datasets and inadequate augmentation. Lastly, significant Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (D-CNNs) have been introduced to detect and classify breast cancer. Still, very few comparative studies were conducted to investigate the accuracy and efficiency of existing CNN architectures. Realising the gaps, this study compares the performance of D-CNN, which includes the original CNN, transfer learning, and an ensemble model, in detecting breast cancer. The comparison study of this paper consists of comparison using six CNN-based deep learning architectures (SE-ResNet152, MobileNetV2, VGG19, ResNet18, InceptionV3, and DenseNet-121), a transfer learning, and an ensemble model on breast cancer detection. Among the comparison of these models, the ensemble model provides the highest detection and classification accuracy of 99.94% for breast cancer detection and classification. However, this study also provides a negative result in the case of transfer learning, as the transfer learning did not increase the accuracy of the original SE-ResNet152, MobileNetV2, VGG19, ResNet18, InceptionV3, and DenseNet-121 model. The high accuracy in detecting and categorising breast cancer detection using CNN suggests that the CNN model is promising in breast cancer disease detection. This research is significant in biomedical engineering, computer-aided disease diagnosis, and ML-based disease detection.

Read more

9/11/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

YOLOv5 vs. YOLOv8 in Marine Fisheries: Balancing Class Detection and Instance Count

Mahmudul Islam Masum, Arif Sarwat, Hugo Riggs, Alicia Boymelgreen, Preyojon Dey

This paper presents a comparative study of object detection using YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 for three distinct classes: artemia, cyst, and excrement. In this comparative study, we analyze the performance of these models in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, etc. where YOLOv5 often performed better in detecting Artemia and cysts with excellent precision and accuracy. However, when it came to detecting excrement, YOLOv5 faced notable challenges and limitations. This suggests that YOLOv8 offers greater versatility and adaptability in detection tasks while YOLOv5 may struggle in difficult situations and may need further fine-tuning or specialized training to enhance its performance. The results show insights into the suitability of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 for detecting objects in challenging marine environments, with implications for applications such as ecological research.

Read more

5/7/2024