EXACT: How to Train Your Accuracy

Read original: arXiv:2205.09615 - Published 7/25/2024 by Ivan Karpukhin, Stanislav Dereka, Sergey Kolesnikov
Total Score

0

🎯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Classification tasks are usually evaluated based on accuracy, but accuracy is discontinuous and cannot be directly optimized using gradient ascent.
  • Popular methods minimize cross-entropy, hinge loss, or other surrogate losses, which can lead to suboptimal results.
  • The paper proposes a new optimization framework by introducing stochasticity to a model's output and optimizing expected accuracy, i.e., the accuracy of the stochastic model.
  • Extensive experiments on linear models and deep image classification show that the proposed optimization method is a powerful alternative to widely used classification losses.

Plain English Explanation

When it comes to classification tasks, accuracy is typically the metric used to evaluate performance. However, accuracy is a discontinuous metric, meaning it can't be directly optimized using gradient ascent, a common optimization technique.

Instead, popular methods minimize other loss functions, like cross-entropy or hinge loss, which are surrogates for accuracy. But using these surrogate losses can lead to suboptimal results.

The researchers in this paper propose a new approach. They introduce stochasticity to the model's output, meaning the model's predictions have an element of randomness. Then, they optimize the expected accuracy of this stochastic model, rather than the accuracy of the deterministic model.

Through extensive experiments on both linear models and deep image classification, the researchers show that their proposed optimization method is a powerful alternative to the widely used classification loss functions.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new optimization framework for classification tasks that aims to directly optimize the expected accuracy of a stochastic model, rather than minimizing a surrogate loss function.

The key idea is to introduce stochasticity into the model's output by sampling from a distribution around the deterministic prediction. The expected accuracy of this stochastic model is then optimized using a Monte Carlo estimate of the gradient.

Extensive experiments were conducted on both linear models and deep image classification tasks. For the linear models, the researchers compared their approach to minimizing the hinge loss and cross-entropy loss. For the deep image classification, they compared to cross-entropy minimization.

The results demonstrate that the proposed optimization method outperforms the standard loss minimization approaches, leading to higher test set accuracy. The authors attribute this to the direct optimization of the expected accuracy objective, which is more aligned with the true evaluation metric.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling optimization framework that directly targets the discontinuous accuracy metric, rather than relying on surrogate losses. This is a valuable contribution, as accuracy is often the ultimate goal in classification tasks.

That said, the authors acknowledge some potential limitations. The stochastic sampling approach introduces additional computational complexity, which may be a concern for large-scale or real-time applications. Additionally, the paper does not explore the impact of the degree of stochasticity on the optimization process and final performance.

Further research could investigate ways to strike a balance between the benefits of the stochastic optimization and the computational overhead. Exploring the relationship between the level of stochasticity and the optimization dynamics could also yield useful insights.

Conclusion

This paper proposes a novel optimization framework for classification tasks that directly optimizes the expected accuracy of a stochastic model. Through extensive experiments, the researchers demonstrate that this approach outperforms standard loss minimization techniques, leading to higher test set accuracy.

The direct optimization of the accuracy metric is a significant contribution, as it addresses the limitations of using surrogate losses. While the added computational complexity is a potential concern, the proposed method opens up new avenues for improving the performance of classification models in a wide range of applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🎯

Total Score

0

EXACT: How to Train Your Accuracy

Ivan Karpukhin, Stanislav Dereka, Sergey Kolesnikov

Classification tasks are usually evaluated in terms of accuracy. However, accuracy is discontinuous and cannot be directly optimized using gradient ascent. Popular methods minimize cross-entropy, hinge loss, or other surrogate losses, which can lead to suboptimal results. In this paper, we propose a new optimization framework by introducing stochasticity to a model's output and optimizing expected accuracy, i.e. accuracy of the stochastic model. Extensive experiments on linear models and deep image classification show that the proposed optimization method is a powerful alternative to widely used classification losses.

Read more

7/25/2024

Optimizing Calibration by Gaining Aware of Prediction Correctness
Total Score

0

Optimizing Calibration by Gaining Aware of Prediction Correctness

Yuchi Liu, Lei Wang, Yuli Zou, James Zou, Liang Zheng

Model calibration aims to align confidence with prediction correctness. The Cross-Entropy (CE) loss is widely used for calibrator training, which enforces the model to increase confidence on the ground truth class. However, we find the CE loss has intrinsic limitations. For example, for a narrow misclassification, a calibrator trained by the CE loss often produces high confidence on the wrongly predicted class (e.g., a test sample is wrongly classified and its softmax score on the ground truth class is around 0.4), which is undesirable. In this paper, we propose a new post-hoc calibration objective derived from the aim of calibration. Intuitively, the proposed objective function asks that the calibrator decrease model confidence on wrongly predicted samples and increase confidence on correctly predicted samples. Because a sample itself has insufficient ability to indicate correctness, we use its transformed versions (e.g., rotated, greyscaled and color-jittered) during calibrator training. Trained on an in-distribution validation set and tested with isolated, individual test samples, our method achieves competitive calibration performance on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution test sets compared with the state of the art. Further, our analysis points out the difference between our method and commonly used objectives such as CE loss and mean square error loss, where the latters sometimes deviates from the calibration aim.

Read more

4/26/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Cross-Entropy Optimization for Hyperparameter Optimization in Stochastic Gradient-based Approaches to Train Deep Neural Networks

Kevin Li, Fulu Li

In this paper, we present a cross-entropy optimization method for hyperparameter optimization in stochastic gradient-based approaches to train deep neural networks. The value of a hyperparameter of a learning algorithm often has great impact on the performance of a model such as the convergence speed, the generalization performance metrics, etc. While in some cases the hyperparameters of a learning algorithm can be part of learning parameters, in other scenarios the hyperparameters of a stochastic optimization algorithm such as Adam [5] and its variants are either fixed as a constant or are kept changing in a monotonic way over time. We give an in-depth analysis of the presented method in the framework of expectation maximization (EM). The presented algorithm of cross-entropy optimization for hyperparameter optimization of a learning algorithm (CEHPO) can be equally applicable to other areas of optimization problems in deep learning. We hope that the presented methods can provide different perspectives and offer some insights for optimization problems in different areas of machine learning and beyond.

Read more

9/17/2024

Making Robust Generalizers Less Rigid with Soft Ascent-Descent
Total Score

0

Making Robust Generalizers Less Rigid with Soft Ascent-Descent

Matthew J. Holland, Toma Hamada

While the traditional formulation of machine learning tasks is in terms of performance on average, in practice we are often interested in how well a trained model performs on rare or difficult data points at test time. To achieve more robust and balanced generalization, methods applying sharpness-aware minimization to a subset of worst-case examples have proven successful for image classification tasks, but only using deep neural networks in a scenario where the most difficult points are also the least common. In this work, we show how such a strategy can dramatically break down under more diverse models, and as a more robust alternative, instead of typical sharpness we propose and evaluate a training criterion which penalizes poor loss concentration, which can be easily combined with loss transformations such as CVaR or DRO that control tail emphasis.

Read more

8/9/2024