An exactly solvable model for emergence and scaling laws
2404.17563
0
0
📈
Abstract
Deep learning models can exhibit what appears to be a sudden ability to solve a new problem as training time ($T$), training data ($D$), or model size ($N$) increases, a phenomenon known as emergence. In this paper, we present a framework where each new ability (a skill) is represented as a basis function. We solve a simple multi-linear model in this skill-basis, finding analytic expressions for the emergence of new skills, as well as for scaling laws of the loss with training time, data size, model size, and optimal compute ($C$). We compare our detailed calculations to direct simulations of a two-layer neural network trained on multitask sparse parity, where the tasks in the dataset are distributed according to a power-law. Our simple model captures, using a single fit parameter, the sigmoidal emergence of multiple new skills as training time, data size or model size increases in the neural network.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a framework for understanding the phenomenon of "emergence" in deep learning models, where models suddenly gain new abilities as training time, data size, or model size increases.
- The authors represent each new ability as a "basis function" and solve a simple multi-linear model to derive analytic expressions for the emergence of new skills and scaling laws.
- They compare their model to simulations of a two-layer neural network trained on a multitask sparse parity dataset, finding that their simple model captures the sigmoidal emergence of multiple new skills.
Plain English Explanation
Deep learning models can sometimes suddenly gain new capabilities as they are trained with more data, for longer periods of time, or with larger model sizes. This phenomenon is known as "emergence." The authors of this paper have developed a framework to understand emergence, where each new ability the model gains is represented as a "basis function."
Using this skill-basis framework, the authors were able to derive mathematical equations that describe how and when new skills emerge, as well as how the performance of the model scales with training time, data size, model size, and the amount of computing power used. They compared these equations to the behavior of a two-layer neural network trained on a dataset of sparse parity tasks, where the tasks follow a power-law distribution. Remarkably, their simple model was able to capture the sigmoidal emergence of multiple new skills in the neural network using just a single parameter.
Technical Explanation
The authors propose a framework where each new ability (or "skill") that a deep learning model gains is represented as a basis function. They then solve a simple multi-linear model in this skill-basis, deriving analytic expressions for the emergence of new skills, as well as for how the model's performance (or "loss") scales with training time, data size, model size, and the amount of compute used.
To test their model, the authors ran direct simulations of a two-layer neural network trained on a multitask sparse parity dataset, where the tasks are distributed according to a power-law. They found that their simple skill-basis model, with a single fit parameter, was able to capture the sigmoidal emergence of multiple new skills as the training time, data size, or model size was increased.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge that their skill-basis framework is a simplified model of the complex dynamics underlying emergence in deep learning. They note that their analysis assumes linear relationships between skills, which may not always hold true in practice.
Additionally, the sparse parity dataset used in the simulations may not be representative of all the types of tasks that deep learning models are applied to in the real world. Further research would be needed to test the generalizability of the authors' findings to other domains and dataset types.
That said, the ability of the authors' model to capture the emergence of new skills using a single fit parameter is an impressive result, and suggests that their framework may provide valuable insights into the fundamental mechanisms driving the emergence phenomenon in deep learning.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel framework for understanding the emergence of new abilities in deep learning models as training time, data size, or model size increases. By representing each new skill as a basis function and solving a simple multi-linear model, the authors were able to derive analytic expressions for the emergence of skills and the scaling of model performance.
The authors' findings suggest that the emergence of new skills in deep learning may be driven by fundamental mathematical principles, rather than being purely a result of the complex, nonlinear dynamics of neural networks. This could have important implications for our understanding of how deep learning systems develop and acquire new capabilities over time.
While the authors' framework is a simplification of reality, it provides a valuable starting point for further research into the mechanisms underlying emergence in deep learning. By continuing to explore these issues, we may gain deeper insights into the inner workings of these powerful AI systems and how to harness their potential more effectively.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Laws
Blake Bordelon, Alexander Atanasov, Cengiz Pehlevan
0
0
On a variety of tasks, the performance of neural networks predictably improves with training time, dataset size and model size across many orders of magnitude. This phenomenon is known as a neural scaling law. Of fundamental importance is the compute-optimal scaling law, which reports the performance as a function of units of compute when choosing model sizes optimally. We analyze a random feature model trained with gradient descent as a solvable model of network training and generalization. This reproduces many observations about neural scaling laws. First, our model makes a prediction about why the scaling of performance with training time and with model size have different power law exponents. Consequently, the theory predicts an asymmetric compute-optimal scaling rule where the number of training steps are increased faster than model parameters, consistent with recent empirical observations. Second, it has been observed that early in training, networks converge to their infinite-width dynamics at a rate $1/textit{width}$ but at late time exhibit a rate $textit{width}^{-c}$, where $c$ depends on the structure of the architecture and task. We show that our model exhibits this behavior. Lastly, our theory shows how the gap between training and test loss can gradually build up over time due to repeated reuse of data.
6/26/2024
A Tale of Tails: Model Collapse as a Change of Scaling Laws
Elvis Dohmatob, Yunzhen Feng, Pu Yang, Francois Charton, Julia Kempe
0
0
As AI model size grows, neural scaling laws have become a crucial tool to predict the improvements of large models when increasing capacity and the size of original (human or natural) training data. Yet, the widespread use of popular models means that the ecosystem of online data and text will co-evolve to progressively contain increased amounts of synthesized data. In this paper we ask: How will the scaling laws change in the inevitable regime where synthetic data makes its way into the training corpus? Will future models, still improve, or be doomed to degenerate up to total (model) collapse? We develop a theoretical framework of model collapse through the lens of scaling laws. We discover a wide range of decay phenomena, analyzing loss of scaling, shifted scaling with number of generations, the ''un-learning of skills, and grokking when mixing human and synthesized data. Our theory is validated by large-scale experiments with a transformer on an arithmetic task and text generation using the large language model Llama2.
6/3/2024
Neural Scaling Laws From Large-N Field Theory: Solvable Model Beyond the Ridgeless Limit
Zhengkang Zhang
0
0
Many machine learning models based on neural networks exhibit scaling laws: their performance scales as power laws with respect to the sizes of the model and training data set. We use large-N field theory methods to solve a model recently proposed by Maloney, Roberts and Sully which provides a simplified setting to study neural scaling laws. Our solution extends the result in this latter paper to general nonzero values of the ridge parameter, which are essential to regularize the behavior of the model. In addition to obtaining new and more precise scaling laws, we also uncover a duality transformation at the diagrams level which explains the symmetry between model and training data set sizes. The same duality underlies recent efforts to design neural networks to simulate quantum field theories.
5/31/2024
🧠
Explaining Neural Scaling Laws
Yasaman Bahri, Ethan Dyer, Jared Kaplan, Jaehoon Lee, Utkarsh Sharma
0
0
The population loss of trained deep neural networks often follows precise power-law scaling relations with either the size of the training dataset or the number of parameters in the network. We propose a theory that explains the origins of and connects these scaling laws. We identify variance-limited and resolution-limited scaling behavior for both dataset and model size, for a total of four scaling regimes. The variance-limited scaling follows simply from the existence of a well-behaved infinite data or infinite width limit, while the resolution-limited regime can be explained by positing that models are effectively resolving a smooth data manifold. In the large width limit, this can be equivalently obtained from the spectrum of certain kernels, and we present evidence that large width and large dataset resolution-limited scaling exponents are related by a duality. We exhibit all four scaling regimes in the controlled setting of large random feature and pretrained models and test the predictions empirically on a range of standard architectures and datasets. We also observe several empirical relationships between datasets and scaling exponents under modifications of task and architecture aspect ratio. Our work provides a taxonomy for classifying different scaling regimes, underscores that there can be different mechanisms driving improvements in loss, and lends insight into the microscopic origins of and relationships between scaling exponents.
4/30/2024