Explain then Rank: Scale Calibration of Neural Rankers Using Natural Language Explanations from LLMs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores using natural language explanations from large language models to calibrate the scale of neural rankers.
- The researchers propose a novel "Explain then Rank" approach to improve the scale calibration of neural ranking models.
- They leverage large language models to generate natural language explanations for ranking decisions, which are then used to recalibrate the ranking scores.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on the problem of scale calibration in neural information retrieval models. These models are used to rank search results, product recommendations, and other content, but their ranking scores can be miscalibrated, meaning they don't accurately reflect the true relevance or quality of the items.
To address this, the researchers developed a new approach called "Explain then Rank". The key idea is to use large language models to generate natural language explanations for the ranking decisions made by the neural ranker. These explanations are then used to recalibrate the ranking scores, making them more accurate and reliable.
The researchers found that this approach led to significant improvements in the scale calibration of the neural rankers, making their outputs more meaningful and useful for real-world applications like search and recommendation systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel "Explain then Rank" approach for scale calibration of neural rankers using natural language explanations from large language models. The key steps are:
-
Explain: The researchers use a large language model (e.g., GPT-3) to generate natural language explanations for the ranking decisions made by the neural ranker. These explanations describe the factors considered by the ranker and the reasoning behind the ranking.
-
Calibrate: The natural language explanations are then used to recalibrate the ranking scores produced by the neural ranker. This is done by learning a mapping between the explanations and the "true" relevance of the items, which allows the ranker's scores to be adjusted to better reflect the actual quality of the content.
-
Rank: The recalibrated ranking scores are then used to produce the final ranking of the items, which is more accurate and meaningful than the original neural ranker's output.
The researchers evaluated their approach on several standard information retrieval datasets and found significant improvements in scale calibration compared to the original neural rankers. They also demonstrated that the recalibrated rankings were more aligned with human judgments of relevance.
Critical Analysis
One potential limitation of the "Explain then Rank" approach is that it relies on the accuracy and reliability of the large language model used to generate the natural language explanations. If the language model produces explanations that are biased or inaccurate, this could negatively impact the scale calibration of the neural ranker.
Additionally, the researchers note that the approach may be computationally intensive, as it requires generating explanations for each ranking decision. This could make it challenging to deploy in real-time applications with strict latency requirements.
Further research could explore ways to improve the efficiency of the explanation generation process, perhaps by using more targeted or pruned language models. Investigating the robustness of the approach to different types of language models and ranking tasks would also be valuable.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel "Explain then Rank" approach that leverages natural language explanations from large language models to improve the scale calibration of neural ranking models. By recalibrating the ranking scores based on the generated explanations, the researchers were able to significantly enhance the accuracy and reliability of the neural rankers.
This work has important implications for a wide range of applications that rely on ranking and recommendation systems, such as search engines, e-commerce platforms, and content discovery platforms. By providing more accurate and interpretable ranking results, the "Explain then Rank" approach has the potential to enhance user experience and trust in these systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Explain then Rank: Scale Calibration of Neural Rankers Using Natural Language Explanations from LLMs
Puxuan Yu, Daniel Cohen, Hemank Lamba, Joel Tetreault, Alex Jaimes
In search settings, calibrating the scores during the ranking process to quantities such as click-through rates or relevance levels enhances a system's usefulness and trustworthiness for downstream users. While previous research has improved this notion of calibration for low complexity learning-to-rank models, the larger data demands and parameter count specific to modern neural text rankers produce unique obstacles that hamper the efficacy of methods intended for the learning-to-rank setting. This paper proposes exploiting large language models (LLMs) to provide relevance and uncertainty signals for these neural text rankers to produce scale-calibrated scores through Monte Carlo sampling of natural language explanations (NLEs). Our approach transforms the neural ranking task from ranking textual query-document pairs to ranking corresponding synthesized NLEs. Comprehensive experiments on two popular document ranking datasets show that the NLE-based calibration approach consistently outperforms past calibration methods and LLM-based methods for ranking, calibration, and query performance prediction tasks.
Read more8/28/2024
🌿
0
Using Natural Language Explanations to Rescale Human Judgments
Manya Wadhwa, Jifan Chen, Junyi Jessy Li, Greg Durrett
The rise of large language models (LLMs) has brought a critical need for high-quality human-labeled data, particularly for processes like human feedback and evaluation. A common practice is to label data via consensus annotation over human judgments. However, annotators' judgments for subjective tasks can differ in many ways: they may reflect different qualitative judgments about an example, and they may be mapped to a labeling scheme in different ways. We show that these nuances can be captured by natural language explanations, and propose a method to rescale ordinal annotations and explanations using LLMs. Specifically, we feed annotators' Likert ratings and corresponding explanations into an LLM and prompt it to produce a numeric score anchored in a scoring rubric. These scores should reflect the annotators' underlying assessments of the example. The rubric can be designed or modified after annotation, and include distinctions that may not have been known when the original error taxonomy was devised. We explore our technique in the context of rating system outputs for a document-grounded question answering task, where LLMs achieve near-human performance. Our method rescales the raw judgments without impacting agreement and brings the scores closer to human judgments grounded in the same scoring rubric.
Read more9/10/2024
0
Uncertainty in Language Models: Assessment through Rank-Calibration
Xinmeng Huang, Shuo Li, Mengxin Yu, Matteo Sesia, Hamed Hassani, Insup Lee, Osbert Bastani, Edgar Dobriban
Language Models (LMs) have shown promising performance in natural language generation. However, as LMs often generate incorrect or hallucinated responses, it is crucial to correctly quantify their uncertainty in responding to given inputs. In addition to verbalized confidence elicited via prompting, many uncertainty measures ($e.g.$, semantic entropy and affinity-graph-based measures) have been proposed. However, these measures can differ greatly, and it is unclear how to compare them, partly because they take values over different ranges ($e.g.$, $[0,infty)$ or $[0,1]$). In this work, we address this issue by developing a novel and practical framework, termed $Rank$-$Calibration$, to assess uncertainty and confidence measures for LMs. Our key tenet is that higher uncertainty (or lower confidence) should imply lower generation quality, on average. Rank-calibration quantifies deviations from this ideal relationship in a principled manner, without requiring ad hoc binary thresholding of the correctness score ($e.g.$, ROUGE or METEOR). The broad applicability and the granular interpretability of our methods are demonstrated empirically.
Read more9/17/2024
0
Towards More Relevant Product Search Ranking Via Large Language Models: An Empirical Study
Qi Liu, Atul Singh, Jingbo Liu, Cun Mu, Zheng Yan
Training Learning-to-Rank models for e-commerce product search ranking can be challenging due to the lack of a gold standard of ranking relevance. In this paper, we decompose ranking relevance into content-based and engagement-based aspects, and we propose to leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) for both label and feature generation in model training, primarily aiming to improve the model's predictive capability for content-based relevance. Additionally, we introduce different sigmoid transformations on the LLM outputs to polarize relevance scores in labeling, enhancing the model's ability to balance content-based and engagement-based relevances and thus prioritize highly relevant items overall. Comprehensive online tests and offline evaluations are also conducted for the proposed design. Our work sheds light on advanced strategies for integrating LLMs into e-commerce product search ranking model training, offering a pathway to more effective and balanced models with improved ranking relevance.
Read more9/27/2024