Explainability as a Requirement for Hardware: Introducing Explainable Hardware (XHW)

Read original: arXiv:2302.14661 - Published 4/26/2024 by Timo Speith, Julian Speith, Steffen Becker, Yixin Zou, Asia Biega, Christof Paar
Total Score

0

🖼️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • As technology advances, there are growing ethical concerns around computing systems, including those related to hardware, not just software.
  • Modern microchips are often opaque, making it difficult to detect and prevent manipulation by malicious actors, which can compromise system security.
  • To address these issues, the paper introduces the concept of Explainable Hardware (XHW), building on previous work on Explainable AI (XAI) and explainable software systems.
  • The paper develops a framework for achieving XHW, involving stakeholders, their requirements, and potential explainability approaches.
  • An exploratory survey with 18 hardware experts showcases applications of the framework and identifies potential research gaps.

Plain English Explanation

As our world becomes increasingly digital, there are growing concerns about the ethical implications of computing systems, including those related to the hardware, not just the software. A key issue is the opaqueness of modern microchips, which can make it difficult to detect and prevent manipulation by malicious actors. This can jeopardize the security and integrity of the entire system.

To address these concerns, the researchers introduce the concept of Explainable Hardware (XHW), which is inspired by and builds on previous work on Explainable AI (XAI) and explainable software systems. The goal of XHW is to make hardware more transparent and understandable, so that potential security issues can be more easily identified and addressed.

The researchers develop a framework for achieving XHW, which involves identifying the relevant stakeholders, understanding their specific requirements for hardware explainability, and exploring possible approaches to meet those requirements. They then conduct an exploratory survey with 18 hardware experts to showcase how the framework can be applied and to uncover potential areas for future research.

By making hardware more explainable, the researchers hope to enhance the security and reliability of computing systems, ultimately benefiting both individuals and society as a whole.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the concept of Explainable Hardware (XHW), which aims to address the growing ethical concerns around the opaqueness of modern microchips. Building on previous work on Explainable AI (XAI) and explainable software systems, the researchers develop a framework for achieving XHW.

The framework comprises three key elements:

  1. Identification of relevant stakeholders, such as hardware designers, system integrators, and end-users.
  2. Understanding the specific requirements these stakeholders might have concerning hardware explainability, such as security, safety, and trust.
  3. Exploration of possible explainability approaches, including causal explanations and generative explanations, to meet the identified requirements.

The researchers then conduct an exploratory survey with 18 hardware experts to showcase how the framework can be applied and to uncover potential research gaps. The survey results provide insights into the practical applications of XHW and help to guide future research in this area.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable foundation for future work and structured debates on Explainable Hardware (XHW). By introducing a comprehensive framework and conducting an exploratory survey, the researchers have highlighted the importance of addressing the ethical concerns related to hardware opaqueness.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific technical challenges and limitations of achieving XHW. For example, it does not discuss the potential trade-offs between hardware explainability and performance, or the challenges of implementing explainability approaches in resource-constrained hardware environments.

Additionally, the survey sample size is relatively small, and the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the survey results. It would be beneficial to conduct a more extensive survey or case studies to better understand the practical implications and real-world challenges of XHW.

Despite these limitations, the paper's conceptual contributions are significant. By drawing parallels to Explainable AI and explainable software systems, the researchers have laid the groundwork for future research and development in the field of hardware explainability. This is an important step towards enhancing the security, reliability, and trustworthiness of computing systems.

Conclusion

This paper introduces the concept of Explainable Hardware (XHW) as a means to address the growing ethical concerns around the opaqueness of modern microchips. By developing a comprehensive framework and conducting an exploratory survey, the researchers have laid the foundation for future work and structured debates on this critical topic.

The key takeaway is the recognition that hardware explainability is just as important as software explainability in ensuring the security and reliability of computing systems. As technology continues to advance, the need for transparent and accountable hardware will only become more pressing. The work presented in this paper is an important step in that direction, and its potential implications extend beyond the technical domain, with broader societal and ethical impacts.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🖼️

Total Score

0

Explainability as a Requirement for Hardware: Introducing Explainable Hardware (XHW)

Timo Speith, Julian Speith, Steffen Becker, Yixin Zou, Asia Biega, Christof Paar

In today's age of digital technology, ethical concerns regarding computing systems are increasing. While the focus of such concerns currently is on requirements for software, this article spotlights the hardware domain, specifically microchips. For example, the opaqueness of modern microchips raises security issues, as malicious actors can manipulate them, jeopardizing system integrity. As a consequence, governments invest substantially to facilitate a secure microchip supply chain. To combat the opaqueness of hardware, this article introduces the concept of Explainable Hardware (XHW). Inspired by and building on previous work on Explainable AI (XAI) and explainable software systems, we develop a framework for achieving XHW comprising relevant stakeholders, requirements they might have concerning hardware, and possible explainability approaches to meet these requirements. Through an exploratory survey among 18 hardware experts, we showcase applications of the framework and discover potential research gaps. Our work lays the foundation for future work and structured debates on XHW.

Read more

4/26/2024

Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Needs, Techniques, Applications, and Future Direction
Total Score

0

Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Needs, Techniques, Applications, and Future Direction

Melkamu Mersha, Khang Lam, Joseph Wood, Ali AlShami, Jugal Kalita

Artificial intelligence models encounter significant challenges due to their black-box nature, particularly in safety-critical domains such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous vehicles. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) addresses these challenges by providing explanations for how these models make decisions and predictions, ensuring transparency, accountability, and fairness. Existing studies have examined the fundamental concepts of XAI, its general principles, and the scope of XAI techniques. However, there remains a gap in the literature as there are no comprehensive reviews that delve into the detailed mathematical representations, design methodologies of XAI models, and other associated aspects. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review encompassing common terminologies and definitions, the need for XAI, beneficiaries of XAI, a taxonomy of XAI methods, and the application of XAI methods in different application areas. The survey is aimed at XAI researchers, XAI practitioners, AI model developers, and XAI beneficiaries who are interested in enhancing the trustworthiness, transparency, accountability, and fairness of their AI models.

Read more

9/4/2024

False Sense of Security in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Total Score

0

False Sense of Security in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Neo Christopher Chung, Hongkyou Chung, Hearim Lee, Lennart Brocki, Hongbeom Chung, George Dyer

A cautious interpretation of AI regulations and policy in the EU and the USA place explainability as a central deliverable of compliant AI systems. However, from a technical perspective, explainable AI (XAI) remains an elusive and complex target where even state of the art methods often reach erroneous, misleading, and incomplete explanations. Explainability has multiple meanings which are often used interchangeably, and there are an even greater number of XAI methods - none of which presents a clear edge. Indeed, there are multiple failure modes for each XAI method, which require application-specific development and continuous evaluation. In this paper, we analyze legislative and policy developments in the United States and the European Union, such as the Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence, the AI Act, the AI Liability Directive, and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) from a right to explanation perspective. We argue that these AI regulations and current market conditions threaten effective AI governance and safety because the objective of trustworthy, accountable, and transparent AI is intrinsically linked to the questionable ability of AI operators to provide meaningful explanations. Unless governments explicitly tackle the issue of explainability through clear legislative and policy statements that take into account technical realities, AI governance risks becoming a vacuous box-ticking exercise where scientific standards are replaced with legalistic thresholds, providing only a false sense of security in XAI.

Read more

6/14/2024

The future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not post-hoc explanations
Total Score

0

The future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not post-hoc explanations

Vinitra Swamy, Jibril Frej, Tanja Kaser

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) plays a crucial role in enabling human understanding and trust in deep learning systems. As models get larger, more ubiquitous, and pervasive in aspects of daily life, explainability is necessary to minimize adverse effects of model mistakes. Unfortunately, current approaches in human-centric XAI (e.g. predictive tasks in healthcare, education, or personalized ads) tend to rely on a single post-hoc explainer, whereas recent work has identified systematic disagreement between post-hoc explainers when applied to the same instances of underlying black-box models. In this paper, we therefore present a call for action to address the limitations of current state-of-the-art explainers. We propose a shift from post-hoc explainability to designing interpretable neural network architectures. We identify five needs of human-centric XAI (real-time, accurate, actionable, human-interpretable, and consistent) and propose two schemes for interpretable-by-design neural network workflows (adaptive routing with InterpretCC and temporal diagnostics with I2MD). We postulate that the future of human-centric XAI is neither in explaining black-boxes nor in reverting to traditional, interpretable models, but in neural networks that are intrinsically interpretable.

Read more

5/29/2024