Explainable AI Reloaded: Challenging the XAI Status Quo in the Era of Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2408.05345 - Published 8/15/2024 by Upol Ehsan, Mark O. Riedl
Total Score

0

Explainable AI Reloaded: Challenging the XAI Status Quo in the Era of Large Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper challenges the current state of Explainable AI (XAI) in the era of large language models (LLMs).
  • It argues that the existing XAI paradigm is inadequate for explaining the complex, opaque, and rapidly evolving LLMs.
  • The paper proposes a new approach to XAI that better aligns with the unique characteristics of LLMs.

Plain English Explanation

Explainable AI (XAI) is the idea that we should be able to understand how AI systems make their decisions. However, the paper argues that the current state of XAI is not sufficient for explaining the latest AI models, particularly the large language models (LLMs) that have become increasingly powerful and ubiquitous.

LLMs are AI systems that can generate human-like text, answer questions, and perform a variety of other tasks. These models are incredibly complex, and their inner workings can be opaque and difficult to understand. The paper suggests that the traditional XAI methods, which often focus on explaining individual decisions or model components, are not well-suited for these large, dynamic AI systems.

Instead, the paper proposes a new approach to XAI that better aligns with the unique characteristics of LLMs. This may involve developing new XAI techniques that can handle the scale and complexity of LLMs, or integrating XAI more seamlessly with the LLM workflow. The goal is to create XAI systems that can truly explain how these powerful AI models work, in a way that is accessible and useful to both experts and the general public.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by highlighting the rapid advancements in large language models (LLMs), which have become increasingly powerful and ubiquitous in recent years. These models, exemplified by GPT-3 and its successors, can perform a wide range of natural language processing tasks with impressive capabilities.

However, the paper argues that the current state of Explainable AI (XAI) is not well-equipped to handle the complexity and opacity of these LLMs. Traditional XAI approaches, such as feature importance and model interpretability, often focus on explaining individual decisions or model components. These methods, the paper suggests, are not sufficient for the holistic understanding required for LLMs.

The paper proposes a new approach to XAI that better aligns with the unique characteristics of LLMs. This may involve developing new XAI techniques that can handle the scale and complexity of LLMs, or integrating XAI more seamlessly with the LLM workflow. The goal is to create XAI systems that can truly explain how these powerful AI models work, in a way that is accessible and useful to both experts and the general public.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises valid concerns about the limitations of the current XAI paradigm in the era of large language models (LLMs). The authors rightly point out that the traditional XAI approaches, which often focus on individual model components or decisions, are not well-suited for the holistic understanding required for these complex, opaque, and rapidly evolving AI systems.

However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive solution to this challenge. While it proposes the need for a new approach to XAI that better aligns with LLMs, the specific details and implementation of this new approach are not fully fleshed out. More research is needed to develop and validate concrete XAI techniques that can effectively explain the inner workings of LLMs.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential trade-offs or limitations of the proposed XAI approach. For instance, it is unclear how the new XAI techniques would balance the need for interpretability with the desire to maintain the powerful capabilities of LLMs. Careful consideration of these challenges will be crucial for the successful implementation of the paper's recommendations.

Conclusion

The paper raises important concerns about the current state of Explainable AI (XAI) in the era of large language models (LLMs). It argues that the existing XAI paradigm is inadequate for explaining the complex, opaque, and rapidly evolving nature of these powerful AI systems.

The paper proposes the need for a new approach to XAI that better aligns with the unique characteristics of LLMs. While the specific details of this new approach are not fully fleshed out, the paper's call for a more holistic and comprehensive XAI framework is well-justified. Developing effective XAI techniques for LLMs will be crucial for ensuring the transparency, accountability, and trust in these rapidly advancing AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Explainable AI Reloaded: Challenging the XAI Status Quo in the Era of Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Explainable AI Reloaded: Challenging the XAI Status Quo in the Era of Large Language Models

Upol Ehsan, Mark O. Riedl

When the initial vision of Explainable (XAI) was articulated, the most popular framing was to open the (proverbial) black-box of AI so that we could understand the inner workings. With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), the very ability to open the black-box is increasingly limited especially when it comes to non-AI expert end-users. In this paper, we challenge the assumption of opening the black-box in the LLM era and argue for a shift in our XAI expectations. Highlighting the epistemic blind spots of an algorithm-centered XAI view, we argue that a human-centered perspective can be a path forward. We operationalize the argument by synthesizing XAI research along three dimensions: explainability outside the black-box, explainability around the edges of the black box, and explainability that leverages infrastructural seams. We conclude with takeaways that reflexively inform XAI as a domain.

Read more

8/15/2024

The future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not post-hoc explanations
Total Score

0

The future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not post-hoc explanations

Vinitra Swamy, Jibril Frej, Tanja Kaser

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) plays a crucial role in enabling human understanding and trust in deep learning systems. As models get larger, more ubiquitous, and pervasive in aspects of daily life, explainability is necessary to minimize adverse effects of model mistakes. Unfortunately, current approaches in human-centric XAI (e.g. predictive tasks in healthcare, education, or personalized ads) tend to rely on a single post-hoc explainer, whereas recent work has identified systematic disagreement between post-hoc explainers when applied to the same instances of underlying black-box models. In this paper, we therefore present a call for action to address the limitations of current state-of-the-art explainers. We propose a shift from post-hoc explainability to designing interpretable neural network architectures. We identify five needs of human-centric XAI (real-time, accurate, actionable, human-interpretable, and consistent) and propose two schemes for interpretable-by-design neural network workflows (adaptive routing with InterpretCC and temporal diagnostics with I2MD). We postulate that the future of human-centric XAI is neither in explaining black-boxes nor in reverting to traditional, interpretable models, but in neural networks that are intrinsically interpretable.

Read more

5/29/2024

🔄

Total Score

0

LLMs for XAI: Future Directions for Explaining Explanations

Alexandra Zytek, Sara Pid`o, Kalyan Veeramachaneni

In response to the demand for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), we investigate the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to transform ML explanations into natural, human-readable narratives. Rather than directly explaining ML models using LLMs, we focus on refining explanations computed using existing XAI algorithms. We outline several research directions, including defining evaluation metrics, prompt design, comparing LLM models, exploring further training methods, and integrating external data. Initial experiments and user study suggest that LLMs offer a promising way to enhance the interpretability and usability of XAI.

Read more

5/13/2024

XAI meets LLMs: A Survey of the Relation between Explainable AI and Large Language Models
Total Score

0

XAI meets LLMs: A Survey of the Relation between Explainable AI and Large Language Models

Erik Cambria, Lorenzo Malandri, Fabio Mercorio, Navid Nobani, Andrea Seveso

In this survey, we address the key challenges in Large Language Models (LLM) research, focusing on the importance of interpretability. Driven by increasing interest from AI and business sectors, we highlight the need for transparency in LLMs. We examine the dual paths in current LLM research and eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): enhancing performance through XAI and the emerging focus on model interpretability. Our paper advocates for a balanced approach that values interpretability equally with functional advancements. Recognizing the rapid development in LLM research, our survey includes both peer-reviewed and preprint (arXiv) papers, offering a comprehensive overview of XAI's role in LLM research. We conclude by urging the research community to advance both LLM and XAI fields together.

Read more

7/23/2024