Explainable Automatic Grading with Neural Additive Models

Overview

• This paper presents a novel approach called Neural Additive Models (NAMs) for explainable automatic grading of student responses.
• NAMs combine the flexibility of neural networks with the interpretability of additive models, allowing the model to provide clear explanations for its predictions.
• The researchers apply NAMs to the task of grading short-answer questions, demonstrating their effectiveness on the RICEChem dataset.

Plain English Explanation

The Road to Clarity: Exploring the Explainable AI World discusses the importance of building AI systems that can explain their decision-making process. This is particularly crucial in high-stakes applications like education, where students and teachers need to understand how an automatic grading system arrives at its scores.

The researchers in this paper have developed a new type of AI model called a Neural Additive Model (NAM) that aims to provide these explanations. NAMs combine the power of neural networks, which can learn complex patterns in data, with the interpretability of additive models, which break down the overall prediction into contributions from different input features.

When applied to the task of automatically grading short-answer questions, NAMs can not only produce a grade, but also explain which parts of the student's response contributed most to that grade. This allows teachers and students to understand the reasoning behind the model's assessment, which can help them improve the quality of future responses.

The researchers tested their NAM approach on the RICEChem dataset, a collection of student responses to chemistry questions. They found that NAMs performed well in terms of grading accuracy, while also providing clear and meaningful explanations for their predictions.

Technical Explanation

The researchers propose using Neural Additive Models (NAMs) as a way to achieve explainable automatic grading. NAMs are a type of neural network that learns a linear combination of learned nonlinear functions of the input features.

To apply NAMs to the task of short-answer grading, the researchers first encode the text of each student response using a pre-trained language model. They then feed these encodings into the NAM, which learns a weighted sum of nonlinear transformations of the input features to produce a final grade prediction.

Importantly, the NAM architecture allows the researchers to extract explanations for the model's predictions. By analyzing the contribution of each input feature to the final grade, they can identify which aspects of the student's response were most influential in determining the overall score.

The researchers evaluate their NAM-based grading system on the RICEChem dataset, which contains short-answer responses to chemistry questions. They compare the performance of NAMs to other interpretable models, as well as to a more complex large multi-modality model that does not provide explanations. The results show that NAMs achieve competitive grading accuracy while also offering clear and meaningful explanations for their predictions.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their work. First, the NAM approach may not be able to capture all the nuances and complexities of student responses, which could limit its grading accuracy compared to more powerful but less interpretable models.

Additionally, the researchers only evaluated their system on a single dataset, the RICEChem dataset, which may not be representative of the full range of short-answer questions and student responses that an automatic grading system would need to handle in practice.

Further research would be needed to assess the generalizability of the NAM approach to other educational domains and question types. It would also be valuable to gather feedback from teachers and students on the usefulness and clarity of the explanations provided by the NAM-based grading system.

Conclusion

This paper presents a promising approach to building explainable automatic grading systems using Neural Additive Models. By combining the flexibility of neural networks with the interpretability of additive models, NAMs can provide both accurate grades and clear explanations for their predictions.

The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their NAM-based system on the RICEChem dataset, suggesting that this technique could be a valuable tool for improving transparency and trust in AI-powered educational assessment. As the use of AI in education continues to grow, developing explainable systems like this will be crucial for ensuring that these technologies benefit students and teachers alike.