Exploring the Boundaries of Content Moderation in Text-to-Image Generation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the challenges and boundaries of content moderation in text-to-image generation models.
- It examines how these models can produce harmful or inappropriate content, and proposes guidelines and strategies for improving safety and responsible development.
- The research aims to better understand the risks and mitigation approaches for text-to-image AI systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at the challenges involved in controlling what kinds of images text-to-image AI models can generate. These models are able to turn written descriptions into visual depictions, but this power also comes with risks - they could potentially create harmful, unethical, or objectionable content.
The researchers examine this issue in depth, exploring the boundaries and limitations of content moderation for these AI systems. They propose guidelines and strategies that could help make the development and deployment of text-to-image models safer and more responsible. The goal is to better understand the risks involved and find ways to mitigate them, so these powerful AI tools can be used in a way that avoids causing harm.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the growing capabilities and widespread adoption of text-to-image generation models, as well as the emerging concerns around their potential to produce harmful content. It then reviews related work on content moderation, safety, and bias in generative AI systems.
The core of the paper is an in-depth examination of the boundaries and limitations of content moderation for text-to-image models. This includes analyzing the types of harmful content that can be generated, the technical challenges of detection and filtration, and the broader societal implications. The researchers also propose a set of guidelines and strategies for improving the safety and responsible development of these models, covering aspects like transparency, testing, and user empowerment.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges several important caveats and limitations in its analysis. For example, it notes that the examples and case studies examined may not be comprehensive, and that the proposed guidelines require further validation and refinement. There is also a recognition that content moderation is an inherently challenging and subjective task, with no perfect solutions.
One potential issue the paper does not fully address is the tension between safety/responsibility and the creative/expressive potential of text-to-image models. Overly restrictive content moderation could potentially impede legitimate artistic or educational uses of these technologies. Balancing these competing considerations will be an important area for ongoing research and debate.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential for differential impacts of text-to-image models on marginalized communities, or the ethical frameworks that should guide their development. These are crucial considerations that warrant further investigation.
Conclusion
This paper provides a valuable and timely exploration of the content moderation challenges facing text-to-image generation models. By examining the boundaries and limitations of safety controls, proposing mitigation strategies, and highlighting areas for future research, the authors make an important contribution to the responsible development of these powerful AI systems.
As text-to-image models continue to advance and proliferate, the issues raised in this paper will only grow in significance. Ongoing dialogue, rigorous testing, and thoughtful policymaking will be essential to ensuring these technologies are deployed in a way that maximizes their benefits while minimizing potential harms to individuals and society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Exploring the Boundaries of Content Moderation in Text-to-Image Generation
Piera Riccio, Georgina Curto, Nuria Oliver
This paper analyzes the community safety guidelines of five text-to-image (T2I) generation platforms and audits five T2I models, focusing on prompts related to the representation of humans in areas that might lead to societal stigma. While current research primarily focuses on ensuring safety by restricting the generation of harmful content, our study offers a complementary perspective. We argue that the concept of safety is difficult to define and operationalize, reflected in a discrepancy between the officially published safety guidelines and the actual behavior of the T2I models, and leading at times to over-censorship. Our findings call for more transparency and an inclusive dialogue about the platforms' content moderation practices, bearing in mind their global cultural and social impact.
Read more9/27/2024
0
T2VSafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Text-to-Video Generative Models
Yibo Miao, Yifan Zhu, Yinpeng Dong, Lijia Yu, Jun Zhu, Xiao-Shan Gao
The recent development of Sora leads to a new era in text-to-video (T2V) generation. Along with this comes the rising concern about its security risks. The generated videos may contain illegal or unethical content, and there is a lack of comprehensive quantitative understanding of their safety, posing a challenge to their reliability and practical deployment. Previous evaluations primarily focus on the quality of video generation. While some evaluations of text-to-image models have considered safety, they cover fewer aspects and do not address the unique temporal risk inherent in video generation. To bridge this research gap, we introduce T2VSafetyBench, a new benchmark designed for conducting safety-critical assessments of text-to-video models. We define 12 critical aspects of video generation safety and construct a malicious prompt dataset including real-world prompts, LLM-generated prompts and jailbreak attack-based prompts. Based on our evaluation results, we draw several important findings, including: 1) no single model excels in all aspects, with different models showing various strengths; 2) the correlation between GPT-4 assessments and manual reviews is generally high; 3) there is a trade-off between the usability and safety of text-to-video generative models. This indicates that as the field of video generation rapidly advances, safety risks are set to surge, highlighting the urgency of prioritizing video safety. We hope that T2VSafetyBench can provide insights for better understanding the safety of video generation in the era of generative AI.
Read more9/10/2024
0
Harm Amplification in Text-to-Image Models
Susan Hao, Renee Shelby, Yuchi Liu, Hansa Srinivasan, Mukul Bhutani, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Ryan Poplin, Shivani Poddar, Sarah Laszlo
Text-to-image (T2I) models have emerged as a significant advancement in generative AI; however, there exist safety concerns regarding their potential to produce harmful image outputs even when users input seemingly safe prompts. This phenomenon, where T2I models generate harmful representations that were not explicit in the input prompt, poses a potentially greater risk than adversarial prompts, leaving users unintentionally exposed to harms. Our paper addresses this issue by formalizing a definition for this phenomenon which we term harm amplification. We further contribute to the field by developing a framework of methodologies to quantify harm amplification in which we consider the harm of the model output in the context of user input. We then empirically examine how to apply these different methodologies to simulate real-world deployment scenarios including a quantification of disparate impacts across genders resulting from harm amplification. Together, our work aims to offer researchers tools to comprehensively address safety challenges in T2I systems and contribute to the responsible deployment of generative AI models.
Read more8/19/2024
0
SafeGen: Mitigating Unsafe Content Generation in Text-to-Image Models
Xinfeng Li, Yuchen Yang, Jiangyi Deng, Chen Yan, Yanjiao Chen, Xiaoyu Ji, Wenyuan Xu
Text-to-image (T2I) models, such as Stable Diffusion, have exhibited remarkable performance in generating high-quality images from text descriptions in recent years. However, text-to-image models may be tricked into generating not-safe-for-work (NSFW) content, particularly in sexually explicit scenarios. Existing countermeasures mostly focus on filtering inappropriate inputs and outputs, or suppressing improper text embeddings, which can block sexually explicit content (e.g., naked) but may still be vulnerable to adversarial prompts -- inputs that appear innocent but are ill-intended. In this paper, we present SafeGen, a framework to mitigate sexual content generation by text-to-image models in a text-agnostic manner. The key idea is to eliminate explicit visual representations from the model regardless of the text input. In this way, the text-to-image model is resistant to adversarial prompts since such unsafe visual representations are obstructed from within. Extensive experiments conducted on four datasets and large-scale user studies demonstrate SafeGen's effectiveness in mitigating sexually explicit content generation while preserving the high-fidelity of benign images. SafeGen outperforms eight state-of-the-art baseline methods and achieves 99.4% sexual content removal performance. Furthermore, our constructed benchmark of adversarial prompts provides a basis for future development and evaluation of anti-NSFW-generation methods.
Read more9/17/2024