T2VSafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Text-to-Video Generative Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces T2VSafetyBench, a framework for evaluating the safety of text-to-video generative models.
- The authors highlight the need for rigorous safety assessment as these models become more advanced and widely deployed.
- T2VSafetyBench includes a diverse dataset of potentially unsafe video prompts and a suite of evaluation metrics to assess model behavior.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new system called T2VSafetyBench that is designed to test the safety of AI models that can generate videos from text prompts. As these text-to-video AI models become more sophisticated, it's important to ensure they don't produce harmful or dangerous content.
T2VSafetyBench provides a way to thoroughly evaluate the safety of these models. It includes a dataset of text prompts that could potentially lead to unsafe video generation, such as prompts related to violence, hate speech, or illegal activities. The framework also defines a set of metrics to measure how the AI model responds to these prompts - for example, whether it generates appropriate or inappropriate content.
By using T2VSafetyBench, researchers and developers can assess the safety of their text-to-video AI models and make improvements to address any issues that are identified. This helps ensure these powerful generative models are deployed responsibly and do not cause unintended harm.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the T2VSafetyBench framework for evaluating the safety of text-to-video generative models. The authors highlight the need for robust safety assessment as these models become more advanced and widely deployed, drawing parallels to prior work on text-to-image safety and automatic jailbreaking.
T2VSafetyBench includes a diverse dataset of potentially unsafe video prompts, covering topics such as violence, hate speech, and illegal activities. The authors define a suite of safety evaluation metrics to assess model behavior, including:
- Prompt toxicity: measuring the level of toxicity in the generated video content
- Multimodal consistency: ensuring alignment between text prompts and generated video
- Factual correctness: verifying the accuracy of generated content
The paper demonstrates the application of T2VSafetyBench on several state-of-the-art text-to-video models, revealing potential safety issues and highlighting areas for improvement. The authors also discuss the SAFESORA approach for aligning text-to-video generation with safety goals.
Critical Analysis
The T2VSafetyBench framework represents an important step towards responsible development of text-to-video generative models. By providing a standardized evaluation suite, the authors enable more rigorous safety assessment and drive progress in this critical area.
However, the paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. The dataset of potentially unsafe prompts, while diverse, may not capture the full complexity of real-world deployment scenarios. Additionally, the defined evaluation metrics, while valuable, may not fully encapsulate all aspects of safety.
Further research is needed to explore more advanced safety-aligned training approaches, similar to the LatentGuard framework for text-to-image models. Ongoing monitoring and adaptation will also be essential as these models continue to evolve.
Ultimately, the T2VSafetyBench represents a crucial foundation for ensuring the safe and responsible development of text-to-video AI systems, with significant implications for the broader multimodal safety landscape.
Conclusion
The T2VSafetyBench framework introduced in this paper is a important contribution to the field of text-to-video generative model safety. By providing a standardized evaluation suite and dataset of potentially unsafe prompts, the authors enable rigorous assessment of these powerful AI systems.
As text-to-video models continue to advance, the need for comprehensive safety measures will only grow. The insights and methodologies presented in this paper can help drive progress towards the responsible development of these technologies, ensuring they are deployed in a way that minimizes potential harms and aligns with societal values. Ongoing research and adaptation will be crucial to stay ahead of emerging safety challenges in this rapidly evolving domain.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
T2VSafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Text-to-Video Generative Models
Yibo Miao, Yifan Zhu, Yinpeng Dong, Lijia Yu, Jun Zhu, Xiao-Shan Gao
The recent development of Sora leads to a new era in text-to-video (T2V) generation. Along with this comes the rising concern about its security risks. The generated videos may contain illegal or unethical content, and there is a lack of comprehensive quantitative understanding of their safety, posing a challenge to their reliability and practical deployment. Previous evaluations primarily focus on the quality of video generation. While some evaluations of text-to-image models have considered safety, they cover fewer aspects and do not address the unique temporal risk inherent in video generation. To bridge this research gap, we introduce T2VSafetyBench, a new benchmark designed for conducting safety-critical assessments of text-to-video models. We define 12 critical aspects of video generation safety and construct a malicious prompt dataset including real-world prompts, LLM-generated prompts and jailbreak attack-based prompts. Based on our evaluation results, we draw several important findings, including: 1) no single model excels in all aspects, with different models showing various strengths; 2) the correlation between GPT-4 assessments and manual reviews is generally high; 3) there is a trade-off between the usability and safety of text-to-video generative models. This indicates that as the field of video generation rapidly advances, safety risks are set to surge, highlighting the urgency of prioritizing video safety. We hope that T2VSafetyBench can provide insights for better understanding the safety of video generation in the era of generative AI.
Read more9/10/2024
0
Exploring the Boundaries of Content Moderation in Text-to-Image Generation
Piera Riccio, Georgina Curto, Nuria Oliver
This paper analyzes the community safety guidelines of five text-to-image (T2I) generation platforms and audits five T2I models, focusing on prompts related to the representation of humans in areas that might lead to societal stigma. While current research primarily focuses on ensuring safety by restricting the generation of harmful content, our study offers a complementary perspective. We argue that the concept of safety is difficult to define and operationalize, reflected in a discrepancy between the officially published safety guidelines and the actual behavior of the T2I models, and leading at times to over-censorship. Our findings call for more transparency and an inclusive dialogue about the platforms' content moderation practices, bearing in mind their global cultural and social impact.
Read more9/27/2024
🛸
0
SafeSora: Towards Safety Alignment of Text2Video Generation via a Human Preference Dataset
Josef Dai, Tianle Chen, Xuyao Wang, Ziran Yang, Taiye Chen, Jiaming Ji, Yaodong Yang
To mitigate the risk of harmful outputs from large vision models (LVMs), we introduce the SafeSora dataset to promote research on aligning text-to-video generation with human values. This dataset encompasses human preferences in text-to-video generation tasks along two primary dimensions: helpfulness and harmlessness. To capture in-depth human preferences and facilitate structured reasoning by crowdworkers, we subdivide helpfulness into 4 sub-dimensions and harmlessness into 12 sub-categories, serving as the basis for pilot annotations. The SafeSora dataset includes 14,711 unique prompts, 57,333 unique videos generated by 4 distinct LVMs, and 51,691 pairs of preference annotations labeled by humans. We further demonstrate the utility of the SafeSora dataset through several applications, including training the text-video moderation model and aligning LVMs with human preference by fine-tuning a prompt augmentation module or the diffusion model. These applications highlight its potential as the foundation for text-to-video alignment research, such as human preference modeling and the development and validation of alignment algorithms.
Read more6/21/2024
🤔
0
Towards Understanding Unsafe Video Generation
Yan Pang, Aiping Xiong, Yang Zhang, Tianhao Wang
Video generation models (VGMs) have demonstrated the capability to synthesize high-quality output. It is important to understand their potential to produce unsafe content, such as violent or terrifying videos. In this work, we provide a comprehensive understanding of unsafe video generation. First, to confirm the possibility that these models could indeed generate unsafe videos, we choose unsafe content generation prompts collected from 4chan and Lexica, and three open-source SOTA VGMs to generate unsafe videos. After filtering out duplicates and poorly generated content, we created an initial set of 2112 unsafe videos from an original pool of 5607 videos. Through clustering and thematic coding analysis of these generated videos, we identify 5 unsafe video categories: Distorted/Weird, Terrifying, Pornographic, Violent/Bloody, and Political. With IRB approval, we then recruit online participants to help label the generated videos. Based on the annotations submitted by 403 participants, we identified 937 unsafe videos from the initial video set. With the labeled information and the corresponding prompts, we created the first dataset of unsafe videos generated by VGMs. We then study possible defense mechanisms to prevent the generation of unsafe videos. Existing defense methods in image generation focus on filtering either input prompt or output results. We propose a new approach called Latent Variable Defense (LVD), which works within the model's internal sampling process. LVD can achieve 0.90 defense accuracy while reducing time and computing resources by 10x when sampling a large number of unsafe prompts.
Read more7/18/2024