Exploring Design Choices for Building Language-Specific LLMs
2406.14670
1
0
Abstract
Despite rapid progress in large language models (LLMs), their performance on a vast majority of languages remain unsatisfactory. In this paper, we study building language-specific LLMs by adapting monolingual and multilingual LLMs. We conduct systematic experiments on how design choices (base model selection, vocabulary extension, and continued fine-tuning) impact the adapted LLM, both in terms of efficiency (how many tokens are needed to encode the same amount of information) and end task performance. We find that (1) the initial performance before the adaptation is not always indicative of the final performance. (2) Efficiency can easily improved with simple vocabulary extension and continued fine-tuning in most LLMs we study, and (3) The optimal adaptation method is highly language-dependent, and the simplest approach works well across various experimental settings. Adapting English-centric models can yield better results than adapting multilingual models despite their worse initial performance on low-resource languages. Together, our work lays foundations on efficiently building language-specific LLMs by adapting existing LLMs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores design choices for building language-specific large language models (LLMs).
- The authors investigate how different architectural choices and training approaches can impact the performance of LLMs on specific languages.
- The findings provide insights into optimizing LLM development for diverse languages and improving multilingual capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have shown impressive performance on a wide range of tasks, but they are often trained on a mix of languages. This can make them less effective for specific languages.
The researchers in this paper looked at different ways to build LLMs that are tailored for individual languages. They experimented with things like the model architecture, the training data, and the learning approach to see how these choices affected the model's performance on specific languages.
By understanding how to design LLMs for particular languages, the researchers hope to help create more effective language models that can better support diverse linguistic needs. This could be especially important for low-resource languages that may not get as much attention in the development of large language models.
The key insights from this work could inform the development of more specialized language models or multilingual models that can adapt to a wider range of languages and better handle tasks like machine translation.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores various design choices for building language-specific LLMs, including architecture, training data, and learning strategies. The authors experiment with parameters like model size, parameter sharing, and task-specific fine-tuning to understand their impact on performance for individual languages.
They compare the effectiveness of monolingual models trained solely on a single language to multilingual models trained on data from multiple languages. The results suggest that while multilingual models can leverage cross-lingual knowledge, monolingual models can outperform them on specific language tasks.
The researchers also investigate techniques like targeted multilingual adaptation and vocabulary sharing to improve the multilingual capabilities of LLMs. These methods aim to better support low-resource languages within a multilingual framework.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough exploration of design choices for language-specific LLMs, but it acknowledges that the findings may be limited by the specific datasets and tasks used in the experiments.
The authors note that further research is needed to understand how these techniques scale to a broader range of languages and applications. They also suggest investigating the interpretability and fairness implications of language-specialized LLMs, as these models may encode biases or differential performance across languages.
While the paper offers valuable insights, it does not address the significant computational and resource requirements for training multiple specialized language models. The tradeoffs between specialized and multilingual approaches warrant further discussion and analysis.
Conclusion
This paper provides a detailed exploration of design choices for building language-specific LLMs. The findings suggest that tailoring model architecture, training data, and learning strategies to individual languages can improve performance compared to multilingual approaches.
The insights from this research could help inform the development of more effective language models that can better support diverse linguistic needs, especially for low-resource languages. This work contributes to the ongoing efforts to create more inclusive and equitable language AI systems that can serve a wide range of users and applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Methodology of Adapting Large English Language Models for Specific Cultural Contexts
Wenjing Zhang, Siqi Xiao, Xuejiao Lei, Ning Wang, Huazheng Zhang, Meijuan An, Bikun Yang, Zhaoxiang Liu, Kai Wang, Shiguo Lian
0
0
The rapid growth of large language models(LLMs) has emerged as a prominent trend in the field of artificial intelligence. However, current state-of-the-art LLMs are predominantly based on English. They encounter limitations when directly applied to tasks in specific cultural domains, due to deficiencies in domain-specific knowledge and misunderstandings caused by differences in cultural values. To address this challenge, our paper proposes a rapid adaptation method for large models in specific cultural contexts, which leverages instruction-tuning based on specific cultural knowledge and safety values data. Taking Chinese as the specific cultural context and utilizing the LLaMA3-8B as the experimental English LLM, the evaluation results demonstrate that the adapted LLM significantly enhances its capabilities in domain-specific knowledge and adaptability to safety values, while maintaining its original expertise advantages.
6/28/2024
SambaLingo: Teaching Large Language Models New Languages
Zoltan Csaki, Bo Li, Jonathan Li, Qiantong Xu, Pian Pawakapan, Leon Zhang, Yun Du, Hengyu Zhao, Changran Hu, Urmish Thakker
0
0
Despite the widespread availability of LLMs, there remains a substantial gap in their capabilities and availability across diverse languages. One approach to address these issues has been to take an existing pre-trained LLM and continue to train it on new languages. While prior works have experimented with language adaptation, many questions around best practices and methodology have not been covered. In this paper, we present a comprehensive investigation into the adaptation of LLMs to new languages. Our study covers the key components in this process, including vocabulary extension, direct preference optimization and the data scarcity problem for human alignment in low-resource languages. We scale these experiments across 9 languages and 2 parameter scales (7B and 70B). We compare our models against Llama 2, Aya-101, XGLM, BLOOM and existing language experts, outperforming all prior published baselines. Additionally, all evaluation code and checkpoints are made public to facilitate future research.
4/10/2024
💬
LlamaTurk: Adapting Open-Source Generative Large Language Models for Low-Resource Language
Cagri Toraman
0
0
Despite advancements in English-dominant generative large language models, further development is needed for low-resource languages to enhance global accessibility. The primary methods for representing these languages are monolingual and multilingual pretraining. Monolingual pretraining is expensive due to hardware requirements, and multilingual models often have uneven performance across languages. This study explores an alternative solution by adapting large language models, primarily trained on English, to low-resource languages. We assess various strategies, including continual training, instruction fine-tuning, task-specific fine-tuning, and vocabulary extension. The results show that continual training improves language comprehension, as reflected in perplexity scores, and task-specific tuning generally enhances performance of downstream tasks. However, extending the vocabulary shows no substantial benefits. Additionally, while larger models improve task performance with few-shot tuning, multilingual models perform worse than their monolingual counterparts when adapted.
5/14/2024
💬
Targeted Multilingual Adaptation for Low-resource Language Families
C. M. Downey, Terra Blevins, Dhwani Serai, Dwija Parikh, Shane Steinert-Threlkeld
0
0
The massively-multilingual training of multilingual models is known to limit their utility in any one language, and they perform particularly poorly on low-resource languages. However, there is evidence that low-resource languages can benefit from targeted multilinguality, where the model is trained on closely related languages. To test this approach more rigorously, we systematically study best practices for adapting a pre-trained model to a language family. Focusing on the Uralic family as a test case, we adapt XLM-R under various configurations to model 15 languages; we then evaluate the performance of each experimental setting on two downstream tasks and 11 evaluation languages. Our adapted models significantly outperform mono- and multilingual baselines. Furthermore, a regression analysis of hyperparameter effects reveals that adapted vocabulary size is relatively unimportant for low-resource languages, and that low-resource languages can be aggressively up-sampled during training at little detriment to performance in high-resource languages. These results introduce new best practices for performing language adaptation in a targeted setting.
5/22/2024