Targeted Multilingual Adaptation for Low-resource Language Families
2405.12413
0
0
💬
Abstract
The massively-multilingual training of multilingual models is known to limit their utility in any one language, and they perform particularly poorly on low-resource languages. However, there is evidence that low-resource languages can benefit from targeted multilinguality, where the model is trained on closely related languages. To test this approach more rigorously, we systematically study best practices for adapting a pre-trained model to a language family. Focusing on the Uralic family as a test case, we adapt XLM-R under various configurations to model 15 languages; we then evaluate the performance of each experimental setting on two downstream tasks and 11 evaluation languages. Our adapted models significantly outperform mono- and multilingual baselines. Furthermore, a regression analysis of hyperparameter effects reveals that adapted vocabulary size is relatively unimportant for low-resource languages, and that low-resource languages can be aggressively up-sampled during training at little detriment to performance in high-resource languages. These results introduce new best practices for performing language adaptation in a targeted setting.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper investigates how to effectively adapt pre-trained multilingual language models to low-resource languages.
- The researchers focus on the Uralic language family as a case study, adapting the XLM-R model to 15 languages.
- They find that their adapted models significantly outperform both monolingual and multilingual baselines.
- The paper also provides insights on hyperparameter settings, suggesting that vocabulary size is less important for low-resource languages and that aggressively upsampling low-resource languages has little detriment to high-resource language performance.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models trained on many languages at once, known as multilingual models, can struggle to perform well on any individual language, especially those with limited data available, known as low-resource languages. However, the authors hypothesize that a more targeted approach of training on a related group of languages, like a language family, could be beneficial for these low-resource cases.
To test this idea, the researchers focus on the Uralic language family and adapt the XLM-R multilingual model to 15 Uralic languages. They experiment with different training configurations and evaluate the performance of the adapted models on two downstream tasks across 11 Uralic languages.
The results show that the adapted models significantly outperform both monolingual and standard multilingual baselines. Additionally, the researchers find that for low-resource Uralic languages, having a larger vocabulary size is not as important as it is for high-resource languages. They also discover that aggressively upsampling the low-resource languages during training has little negative impact on the model's performance on high-resource languages.
These findings introduce new best practices for effectively adapting pre-trained language models to low-resource language families, which could help improve the utility of such models for a wider range of languages.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a systematic study of best practices for adapting a pre-trained multilingual language model, specifically XLM-R, to a language family. The researchers focus on the Uralic language family as a case study, adapting the model to 15 Uralic languages.
The experiment design involves training the XLM-R model under various configurations, including different vocabulary sizes, upsampling ratios for low-resource languages, and the inclusion of closely related languages. The team then evaluates the performance of the adapted models on two downstream tasks across 11 Uralic languages, comparing them to both monolingual and standard multilingual baselines.
The results show that the adapted Uralic models significantly outperform the baseline models, demonstrating the benefits of this targeted multilinguality approach. Furthermore, the researchers conducted a regression analysis to understand the effects of different hyperparameters, revealing that vocabulary size is relatively unimportant for low-resource languages, and that aggressively upsampling low-resource languages during training has little detriment to high-resource language performance.
These findings introduce new best practices for effectively adapting pre-trained language models to low-resource language families, which could help improve the utility of such models for a wider range of languages. The researchers highlight the potential for this approach to benefit other language families beyond Uralic.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and rigorous study, providing valuable insights into the challenges of adapting multilingual language models to low-resource languages. The focus on the Uralic language family as a case study is a thoughtful choice, as it represents a diverse set of languages with varying resource levels.
One potential limitation of the study is the scope of the evaluation, which is focused primarily on the Uralic language family. While the researchers mention the potential for this approach to benefit other language families, it would be informative to see how well the findings generalize to other low-resource language contexts.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the underlying reasons why vocabulary size is less important for low-resource languages or why aggressive upsampling of these languages has limited impact on high-resource language performance. Further exploration of the linguistic and structural factors that contribute to these observations could provide deeper insights and inform future model adaptation strategies.
Despite these minor caveats, the paper presents a compelling and impactful contribution to the field of multilingual language modeling. The findings introduce new best practices that could significantly improve the performance and utility of language models for a wider range of languages, particularly those with limited resources. Researchers and practitioners working in the area of low-resource language processing would benefit from carefully considering the implications of this work.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel approach to adapting pre-trained multilingual language models to low-resource languages by targeting related language families. The researchers' systematic study on the Uralic language family demonstrates that this targeted multilinguality approach can significantly outperform both monolingual and standard multilingual baselines.
The key insights from the paper, such as the relative unimportance of vocabulary size for low-resource languages and the ability to aggressively upsample these languages with little detriment to high-resource performance, provide valuable guidance for future efforts in adapting language models to underserved linguistic communities. These findings have the potential to improve the accessibility and utility of advanced language technologies for a wider range of users and applications.
As the field of natural language processing continues to grapple with the challenge of supporting the world's diverse languages, this research represents an important step forward in developing more inclusive and effective language models. The principles and best practices introduced in this paper can serve as a foundation for further exploration and innovation in the area of multilingual language model adaptation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
LlamaTurk: Adapting Open-Source Generative Large Language Models for Low-Resource Language
Cagri Toraman
0
0
Despite advancements in English-dominant generative large language models, further development is needed for low-resource languages to enhance global accessibility. The primary methods for representing these languages are monolingual and multilingual pretraining. Monolingual pretraining is expensive due to hardware requirements, and multilingual models often have uneven performance across languages. This study explores an alternative solution by adapting large language models, primarily trained on English, to low-resource languages. We assess various strategies, including continual training, instruction fine-tuning, task-specific fine-tuning, and vocabulary extension. The results show that continual training improves language comprehension, as reflected in perplexity scores, and task-specific tuning generally enhances performance of downstream tasks. However, extending the vocabulary shows no substantial benefits. Additionally, while larger models improve task performance with few-shot tuning, multilingual models perform worse than their monolingual counterparts when adapted.
5/14/2024
Exploring Design Choices for Building Language-Specific LLMs
Atula Tejaswi, Nilesh Gupta, Eunsol Choi
0
0
Despite rapid progress in large language models (LLMs), their performance on a vast majority of languages remain unsatisfactory. In this paper, we study building language-specific LLMs by adapting monolingual and multilingual LLMs. We conduct systematic experiments on how design choices (base model selection, vocabulary extension, and continued fine-tuning) impact the adapted LLM, both in terms of efficiency (how many tokens are needed to encode the same amount of information) and end task performance. We find that (1) the initial performance before the adaptation is not always indicative of the final performance. (2) Efficiency can easily improved with simple vocabulary extension and continued fine-tuning in most LLMs we study, and (3) The optimal adaptation method is highly language-dependent, and the simplest approach works well across various experimental settings. Adapting English-centric models can yield better results than adapting multilingual models despite their worse initial performance on low-resource languages. Together, our work lays foundations on efficiently building language-specific LLMs by adapting existing LLMs.
6/24/2024
An Initial Investigation of Language Adaptation for TTS Systems under Low-resource Scenarios
Cheng Gong, Erica Cooper, Xin Wang, Chunyu Qiang, Mengzhe Geng, Dan Wells, Longbiao Wang, Jianwu Dang, Marc Tessier, Aidan Pine, Korin Richmond, Junichi Yamagishi
0
0
Self-supervised learning (SSL) representations from massively multilingual models offer a promising solution for low-resource language speech tasks. Despite advancements, language adaptation in TTS systems remains an open problem. This paper explores the language adaptation capability of ZMM-TTS, a recent SSL-based multilingual TTS system proposed in our previous work. We conducted experiments on 12 languages using limited data with various fine-tuning configurations. We demonstrate that the similarity in phonetics between the pre-training and target languages, as well as the language category, affects the target language's adaptation performance. Additionally, we find that the fine-tuning dataset size and number of speakers influence adaptability. Surprisingly, we also observed that using paired data for fine-tuning is not always optimal compared to audio-only data. Beyond speech intelligibility, our analysis covers speaker similarity, language identification, and predicted MOS.
6/14/2024
SambaLingo: Teaching Large Language Models New Languages
Zoltan Csaki, Bo Li, Jonathan Li, Qiantong Xu, Pian Pawakapan, Leon Zhang, Yun Du, Hengyu Zhao, Changran Hu, Urmish Thakker
0
0
Despite the widespread availability of LLMs, there remains a substantial gap in their capabilities and availability across diverse languages. One approach to address these issues has been to take an existing pre-trained LLM and continue to train it on new languages. While prior works have experimented with language adaptation, many questions around best practices and methodology have not been covered. In this paper, we present a comprehensive investigation into the adaptation of LLMs to new languages. Our study covers the key components in this process, including vocabulary extension, direct preference optimization and the data scarcity problem for human alignment in low-resource languages. We scale these experiments across 9 languages and 2 parameter scales (7B and 70B). We compare our models against Llama 2, Aya-101, XGLM, BLOOM and existing language experts, outperforming all prior published baselines. Additionally, all evaluation code and checkpoints are made public to facilitate future research.
4/10/2024