Exploring the Efficacy of Large Language Models (GPT-4) in Binary Reverse Engineering

Read original: arXiv:2406.06637 - Published 6/12/2024 by Saman Pordanesh, Benjamin Tan
Total Score

0

Exploring the Efficacy of Large Language Models (GPT-4) in Binary Reverse Engineering

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, in the field of binary reverse engineering.
  • Binary reverse engineering is the process of analyzing compiled software or malware to understand its inner workings and functionality.
  • The researchers investigate the potential of LLMs to assist with various tasks in binary reverse engineering, such as code interpretation, decompiled code analysis, and malware analysis.

Plain English Explanation

Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. This paper looks at how these models can be used in the field of binary reverse engineering, which is the process of analyzing compiled software or malware to figure out how it works.

The researchers wanted to see if LLMs could help with different tasks in binary reverse engineering, such as interpreting code, analyzing decompiled code (code that has been converted back from a compiled state), and analyzing malware. They investigated the capabilities of GPT-4, one of the latest and most advanced LLMs, to see how effective it could be in these areas.

The goal was to explore whether LLMs like GPT-4 could be a useful tool for researchers and professionals working on understanding and analyzing binary code, which can be a complex and challenging task. By leveraging the language understanding and generation capabilities of these models, the researchers hoped to find ways to make binary reverse engineering more efficient and effective.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a study on the use of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, in the domain of binary reverse engineering. Binary reverse engineering is the process of analyzing compiled software or malware to understand its underlying functionality and structure.

The researchers evaluated the performance of GPT-4 in various tasks related to binary reverse engineering, including code interpretation, decompiled code analysis, and malware analysis. They designed experiments to assess the model's ability to understand and reason about binary code, as well as its potential to assist human analysts in these tasks.

The study involved feeding GPT-4 with different types of binary code, decompiled code, and malware samples, and then evaluating the model's responses in terms of accuracy, depth of understanding, and usefulness for reverse engineering purposes. The researchers also compared the performance of GPT-4 to that of human experts in certain tasks to understand the model's relative strengths and limitations.

The findings suggest that GPT-4 exhibits promising capabilities in binary reverse engineering, particularly in areas such as code interpretation and decompiled code analysis. The model was able to provide meaningful insights, identify key functionalities, and assist in the reverse engineering process. However, the paper also highlights the need for further research and validation, as well as the potential limitations of LLMs in handling the complexities and nuances of binary code.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a valuable exploration of the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the domain of binary reverse engineering. By focusing on the capabilities of GPT-4, the authors provide insights into the current state of the art and the areas where LLMs can be beneficial.

One of the key strengths of the research is the comprehensive approach, covering various tasks within binary reverse engineering, such as code interpretation, decompiled code analysis, and malware analysis. This broad scope allows for a more holistic understanding of the LLM's performance and its potential impact on the field.

However, the paper also acknowledges the limitations and caveats of the study. The researchers emphasize the need for further research and validation to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of LLMs in binary reverse engineering. Additionally, the paper suggests that while LLMs can provide valuable insights, they should be seen as assistive tools rather than a replacement for human expertise and domain-specific knowledge.

Some additional concerns that could be raised include the potential biases or inaccuracies inherent in the training data of the LLMs, the need for robust testing and validation procedures, and the potential security implications of using LLMs in sensitive domains like malware analysis.

Overall, the paper serves as a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around the use of LLMs in specialized technical domains, highlighting both the promise and the challenges that come with leveraging these powerful AI systems.

Conclusion

This paper explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, in the field of binary reverse engineering. The researchers investigate the model's capabilities in tasks such as code interpretation, decompiled code analysis, and malware analysis, with the goal of understanding how LLMs can assist and augment the reverse engineering process.

The findings suggest that GPT-4 exhibits promising capabilities in these areas, providing meaningful insights and assisting human analysts. However, the paper also highlights the need for further research and validation to fully understand the limitations and potential pitfalls of using LLMs in such a specialized domain.

Overall, this study contributes to the growing body of research on the applications of LLMs in technical domains and underscores the importance of carefully evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of these powerful AI systems when applied to complex real-world problems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Exploring the Efficacy of Large Language Models (GPT-4) in Binary Reverse Engineering
Total Score

0

Exploring the Efficacy of Large Language Models (GPT-4) in Binary Reverse Engineering

Saman Pordanesh, Benjamin Tan

This study investigates the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, in the context of Binary Reverse Engineering (RE). Employing a structured experimental approach, we analyzed the LLM's performance in interpreting and explaining human-written and decompiled codes. The research encompassed two phases: the first on basic code interpretation and the second on more complex malware analysis. Key findings indicate LLMs' proficiency in general code understanding, with varying effectiveness in detailed technical and security analyses. The study underscores the potential and current limitations of LLMs in reverse engineering, revealing crucial insights for future applications and improvements. Also, we examined our experimental methodologies, such as methods of evaluation and data constraints, which provided us with a technical vision for any future research activity in this field.

Read more

6/12/2024

How Well Do Large Language Models Serve as End-to-End Secure Code Producers?
Total Score

0

How Well Do Large Language Models Serve as End-to-End Secure Code Producers?

Jianian Gong, Nachuan Duan, Ziheng Tao, Zhaohui Gong, Yuan Yuan, Minlie Huang

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 has revolutionized the landscape of software engineering, positioning these models at the core of modern development practices. As we anticipate these models to evolve into the primary and trustworthy tools used in software development, ensuring the security of the code they produce becomes paramount. How well can LLMs serve as end-to-end secure code producers? This paper presents a systematic investigation into LLMs' inherent potential to generate code with fewer vulnerabilities. Specifically, We studied GPT-3.5 and GPT-4's capability to identify and repair vulnerabilities in the code generated by four popular LLMs including themselves (GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Code Llama, and CodeGeeX2). By manually or automatically reviewing 4,900 pieces of code, our study reveals that: (1) large language models lack awareness of scenario-relevant security risks, which leads to the generation of over 75% vulnerable code on the SecurityEval benchmark; (2) LLMs such as GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 are unable to precisely identify vulnerabilities in the code they generated; (3) GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 can achieve 33.2%~59.6% success rates in repairing the insecure code produced by the 4 LLMs, but they both perform poorly when repairing self-produced code, indicating self-repair blind spots. To address the limitation of a single round of repair, we developed a lightweight tool that prompts LLMs to construct safer source code through an iterative repair procedure based on the insights gained from our study. Experiments show that assisted by semantic analysis engines, our tool significantly improves the success rates of repair to 65.9%~85.5%.

Read more

8/21/2024

💬

Total Score

0

From Text to Insight: Leveraging Large Language Models for Performance Evaluation in Management

Ning Li, Huaikang Zhou, Mingze Xu

This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, to enhance objectivity in organizational task performance evaluations. Through comparative analyses across two studies, including various task performance outputs, we demonstrate that LLMs can serve as a reliable and even superior alternative to human raters in evaluating knowledge-based performance outputs, which are a key contribution of knowledge workers. Our results suggest that GPT ratings are comparable to human ratings but exhibit higher consistency and reliability. Additionally, combined multiple GPT ratings on the same performance output show strong correlations with aggregated human performance ratings, akin to the consensus principle observed in performance evaluation literature. However, we also find that LLMs are prone to contextual biases, such as the halo effect, mirroring human evaluative biases. Our research suggests that while LLMs are capable of extracting meaningful constructs from text-based data, their scope is currently limited to specific forms of performance evaluation. By highlighting both the potential and limitations of LLMs, our study contributes to the discourse on AI role in management studies and sets a foundation for future research to refine AI theoretical and practical applications in management.

Read more

8/13/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Multilingual Machine Translation with Large Language Models: Empirical Results and Analysis

Wenhao Zhu, Hongyi Liu, Qingxiu Dong, Jingjing Xu, Shujian Huang, Lingpeng Kong, Jiajun Chen, Lei Li

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in handling multilingual machine translation (MMT). In this paper, we systematically investigate the advantages and challenges of LLMs for MMT by answering two questions: 1) How well do LLMs perform in translating massive languages? 2) Which factors affect LLMs' performance in translation? We thoroughly evaluate eight popular LLMs, including ChatGPT and GPT-4. Our empirical results show that translation capabilities of LLMs are continually involving. GPT-4 has beat the strong supervised baseline NLLB in 40.91% of translation directions but still faces a large gap towards the commercial translation system like Google Translate, especially on low-resource languages. Through further analysis, we discover that LLMs exhibit new working patterns when used for MMT. First, LLM can acquire translation ability in a resource-efficient way and generate moderate translation even on zero-resource languages. Second, instruction semantics can surprisingly be ignored when given in-context exemplars. Third, cross-lingual exemplars can provide better task guidance for low-resource translation than exemplars in the same language pairs. Code will be released at: https://github.com/NJUNLP/MMT-LLM.

Read more

6/17/2024