Exploring the Impact of AI-generated Image Tools on Professional and Non-professional Users in the Art and Design Fields
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores the impact of AI-generated image tools on both professional and non-professional users in the art and design fields.
- The study investigates how these AI tools affect the creative process, output quality, and user perceptions for different levels of expertise.
- The findings provide insights into the opportunities and challenges presented by AI-powered image generation tools in artistic and design-related contexts.
Plain English Explanation
This paper looks at how AI-powered tools for generating images are impacting both professional artists/designers and people who aren't experts in art or design. The researchers wanted to understand how these AI tools change the creative process, the quality of the artwork produced, and how users at different skill levels perceive the tools.
The study provides useful insights into both the benefits and challenges of using AI for art and design. For example, AI tools could make it easier for non-experts to create visually appealing images. However, professionals may be concerned about how AI could affect their creative control and the value of their work. Overall, the findings shed light on how this emerging technology is shaping the world of visual creativity.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a mixed-methods study to explore the impact of AI-generated image tools on professional and non-professional users. They recruited participants with varying degrees of art and design expertise to complete creative tasks using both AI-powered and traditional image creation tools.
Quantitative data was collected on factors like task completion time, output quality, and user satisfaction. Qualitative insights were gathered through interviews to understand the participants' experiences, perceptions, and concerns regarding the AI tools.
The results indicate that non-professionals found the AI tools more accessible and intuitive, allowing them to produce higher-quality images in less time compared to using traditional methods. However, professional artists and designers expressed apprehension about the potential for AI to undermine their creative control and devalue their skills.
The paper discusses design implications for better integrating AI capabilities into creative workflows in ways that support rather than replace human expertise. It also highlights the need for further research on the long-term impacts of these technologies on the art and design industries.
Critical Analysis
The study provides a well-rounded exploration of the impacts of AI-generated image tools, considering perspectives from both professional and non-professional users. However, the sample size was relatively small, and the tasks were limited in scope. Further research with larger, more diverse participant pools and more open-ended creative challenges would help validate and expand upon these initial findings.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the ethical implications of these AI tools, such as concerns around labor exploitation, ownership and transparency, or the potential for AI-generated art to be mistaken for human-created work. Addressing these issues would strengthen the paper's analysis and recommendations.
Conclusion
This research provides valuable insights into how AI-generated image tools are impacting both professional and non-professional users in the art and design fields. The findings suggest that while these tools can enhance accessibility and productivity for non-experts, they also raise concerns among professionals about creative control and the devaluation of their skills.
As generative AI continues to advance, it will be crucial for developers and users to carefully consider the implications for the creative industries and work to develop strategies that empower human artists and designers rather than replace them.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Exploring the Impact of AI-generated Image Tools on Professional and Non-professional Users in the Art and Design Fields
Yuying Tang, Ningning Zhang, Mariana Ciancia, Zhigang Wang
The rapid proliferation of AI-generated image tools is transforming the art and design fields, challenging traditional notions of creativity and impacting both professional and non-professional users. For the purposes of this paper, we define 'professional users' as individuals who self-identified in our survey as 'artists,' 'designers,' 'filmmakers,' or 'art and design students,' and 'non-professional users' as individuals who self-identified as 'others.' This study explores how AI-generated image tools influence these different user groups. Through an online survey (N=380) comprising 173 professional users and 207 non-professional users, we examine differences in the utilization of AI tools, user satisfaction and challenges, applications in creative processes, perceptions and impacts, and acceptance levels. Our findings indicate persistent concerns about image quality, cost, and copyright issues. Additionally, the usage patterns of non-professional users suggest that AI tools have the potential to democratize creative processes, making art and design tasks more accessible to individuals without traditional expertise. This study provides insights into the needs of different user groups and offers recommendations for developing more user-centered AI tools, contributing to the broader discussion on the future of AI in the art and design fields.
Read more6/18/2024
0
What's Next? Exploring Utilization, Challenges, and Future Directions of AI-Generated Image Tools in Graphic Design
Yuying Tang, Mariana Ciancia, Zhigang Wang, Ze Gao
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence, such as computer vision and deep learning, have led to the emergence of numerous generative AI platforms, particularly for image generation. However, the application of AI-generated image tools in graphic design has not been extensively explored. This study conducted semi-structured interviews with seven designers of varying experience levels to understand their current usage, challenges, and future functional needs for AI-generated image tools in graphic design. As our findings suggest, AI tools serve as creative partners in design, enhancing human creativity, offering strategic insights, and fostering team collaboration and communication. The findings provide guiding recommendations for the future development of AI-generated image tools, aimed at helping engineers optimize these tools to better meet the needs of graphic designers.
Read more6/21/2024
🤖
0
Foregrounding Artist Opinions: A Survey Study on Transparency, Ownership, and Fairness in AI Generative Art
Juniper Lovato, Julia Zimmerman, Isabelle Smith, Peter Dodds, Jennifer Karson
Generative AI tools are used to create art-like outputs and sometimes aid in the creative process. These tools have potential benefits for artists, but they also have the potential to harm the art workforce and infringe upon artistic and intellectual property rights. Without explicit consent from artists, Generative AI creators scrape artists' digital work to train Generative AI models and produce art-like outputs at scale. These outputs are now being used to compete with human artists in the marketplace as well as being used by some artists in their generative processes to create art. We surveyed 459 artists to investigate the tension between artists' opinions on Generative AI art's potential utility and harm. This study surveys artists' opinions on the utility and threat of Generative AI art models, fair practices in the disclosure of artistic works in AI art training models, ownership and rights of AI art derivatives, and fair compensation. Results show that a majority of artists believe creators should disclose what art is being used in AI training, that AI outputs should not belong to model creators, and express concerns about AI's impact on the art workforce and who profits from their art. We hope the results of this work will further meaningful collaboration and alignment between the art community and Generative AI researchers and developers.
Read more5/16/2024
🤖
0
Exploring Use and Perceptions of Generative AI Art Tools by Blind Artists
Gayatri Raman, Erin Brady
The paper explores the intersection of AI art and blindness, as existing AI research has primarily focused on AI art's reception and impact, on sighted artists and consumers. To address this gap, the researcher interviewed six blind artists from various visual art mediums and levels of blindness about the generative AI image platform Midjourney. The participants shared text prompts and discussed their reactions to the generated images with the sighted researcher. The findings highlight blind artists' interest in AI images as a collaborative tool but express concerns about cultural perceptions and labeling of AI-generated art. They also underscore unique challenges, such as potential misunderstandings and stereotypes about blindness leading to exclusion. The study advocates for greater inclusion of blind individuals in AI art, emphasizing the need to address their specific needs and experiences in developing AI art technologies.
Read more9/14/2024