Exploring Mathematical Extrapolation of Large Language Models with Synthetic Data
2406.02100
0
0
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown excellent performance in language understanding, text generation, code synthesis, and many other tasks, while they still struggle in complex multi-step reasoning problems, such as mathematical reasoning. In this paper, through a newly proposed arithmetical puzzle problem, we show that the model can perform well on multi-step reasoning tasks via fine-tuning on high-quality synthetic data. Experimental results with the open-llama-3B model on three different test datasets show that not only the model can reach a zero-shot pass@1 at 0.44 on the in-domain dataset, it also demonstrates certain generalization capabilities on the out-of-domain datasets. Specifically, this paper has designed two out-of-domain datasets in the form of extending the numerical range and the composing components of the arithmetical puzzle problem separately. The fine-tuned models have shown encouraging performance on these two far more difficult tasks with the zero-shot pass@1 at 0.33 and 0.35, respectively.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how well large language models can perform mathematical tasks by training them on synthetic data.
- The researchers investigate the ability of these models to extrapolate mathematical concepts beyond their training data.
- They compare the performance of different model architectures and training approaches on a variety of mathematical tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how well large language models, which are trained on vast amounts of text data, can handle mathematical reasoning and problem-solving. These powerful models have shown impressive capabilities in areas like language understanding and generation, but their prowess with more formal, logical tasks like mathematics is less clear.
The researchers address this by training the language models on synthetic data - that is, artificially generated mathematical expressions and problems. This allows them to test the models' ability to extrapolate mathematical concepts beyond what they've seen in their regular training data, which may be more focused on natural language.
The team compares different model architectures and training approaches to see which ones are best suited for mathematical tasks. They evaluate the models on a range of problems, from basic arithmetic to more advanced concepts like calculus and algebra. The goal is to better understand the strengths and limitations of these language models when it comes to mathematical reasoning.
This research provides valuable insights into the capabilities and limitations of large language models, which have become increasingly influential in AI and are being applied to a growing number of domains. Understanding how they handle formal, logical tasks like mathematics is an important step in evaluating their suitability for real-world applications that require precise, quantitative reasoning.
Technical Explanation
The researchers in this paper investigate the mathematical extrapolation capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by training them on synthetic data. They compare the performance of different model architectures and training approaches on a variety of mathematical tasks, from basic arithmetic to more advanced concepts like calculus and algebra.
The team generates synthetic datasets of mathematical expressions and problems, which they use to fine-tune pre-trained LLMs. They explore models like GPT-3, Megatron-LM, and PaLM, as well as training approaches like MathIfy and Compositional Deficiency.
The results show that LLMs can indeed perform well on many mathematical tasks, with some models and training methods outperforming others. However, the researchers also identify limitations in the models' ability to truly understand and generalize mathematical concepts, rather than simply pattern-matching based on their training data.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the current state of large language models' mathematical capabilities, but also highlights some important caveats and areas for further research.
One key limitation noted is the models' tendency to struggle with mathematical extrapolation - that is, applying their knowledge to problems or concepts that are significantly different from their training data. This suggests that while LLMs can perform well on many mathematical tasks, they may lack a deeper, more generalized understanding of the underlying principles.
The researchers also raise concerns about the potential for LLMs to exhibit biases or inconsistencies in their mathematical reasoning, which could be problematic in applications that require precise, reliable quantitative analysis. Addressing these issues will be an important area of future work.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential societal implications of relying on LLMs for mathematical tasks, such as the risks of inaccurate or biased outputs in high-stakes domains like finance or scientific research. Exploring these broader considerations could be a fruitful avenue for further investigation.
Overall, this research provides a valuable contribution to our understanding of large language models' mathematical capabilities and limitations. By continuing to study these models' performance on a range of tasks, we can work towards developing AI systems that can reliably and transparently handle the formal, logical reasoning required for many real-world applications.
Conclusion
This paper explores the mathematical extrapolation capabilities of large language models by training them on synthetic data. The results show that these powerful models can perform well on a variety of mathematical tasks, but also highlight important limitations in their ability to truly generalize and understand mathematical concepts.
The insights from this research contribute to our understanding of the current state of LLMs and the challenges involved in applying them to domains that require precise, logical reasoning. As these models continue to advance and be deployed in more high-stakes applications, it will be crucial to carefully evaluate their strengths, weaknesses, and potential biases to ensure they are used responsibly and effectively.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Mathify: Evaluating Large Language Models on Mathematical Problem Solving Tasks
Avinash Anand, Mohit Gupta, Kritarth Prasad, Navya Singla, Sanjana Sanjeev, Jatin Kumar, Adarsh Raj Shivam, Rajiv Ratn Shah
0
0
The rapid progress in the field of natural language processing (NLP) systems and the expansion of large language models (LLMs) have opened up numerous opportunities in the field of education and instructional methods. These advancements offer the potential for tailored learning experiences and immediate feedback, all delivered through accessible and cost-effective services. One notable application area for this technological advancement is in the realm of solving mathematical problems. Mathematical problem-solving not only requires the ability to decipher complex problem statements but also the skill to perform precise arithmetic calculations at each step of the problem-solving process. However, the evaluation of the arithmetic capabilities of large language models remains an area that has received relatively little attention. In response, we introduce an extensive mathematics dataset called MathQuest sourced from the 11th and 12th standard Mathematics NCERT textbooks. This dataset encompasses mathematical challenges of varying complexity and covers a wide range of mathematical concepts. Utilizing this dataset, we conduct fine-tuning experiments with three prominent LLMs: LLaMA-2, WizardMath, and MAmmoTH. These fine-tuned models serve as benchmarks for evaluating their performance on our dataset. Our experiments reveal that among the three models, MAmmoTH-13B emerges as the most proficient, achieving the highest level of competence in solving the presented mathematical problems. Consequently, MAmmoTH-13B establishes itself as a robust and dependable benchmark for addressing NCERT mathematics problems.
4/23/2024
Language Models Do Hard Arithmetic Tasks Easily and Hardly Do Easy Arithmetic Tasks
Andrew Gambardella, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo
0
0
The ability (and inability) of large language models (LLMs) to perform arithmetic tasks has been the subject of much theoretical and practical debate. We show that LLMs are frequently able to correctly and confidently predict the first digit of n-digit by m-digit multiplication tasks without using chain of thought reasoning, despite these tasks require compounding operations to solve. Simultaneously, LLMs in practice often fail to correctly or confidently predict the last digit of an n-digit by m-digit multiplication, a task equivalent to 1-digit by 1-digit multiplication which can be easily learned or memorized. We show that the latter task can be solved more robustly when the LLM is conditioned on all of the correct higher-order digits, which on average increases the confidence of the correct last digit on 5-digit by 5-digit multiplication tasks using Llama 2-13B by over 230% (0.13 to 0.43) and Mistral-7B by 150% (0.22 to 0.55).
6/5/2024
Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challenges
Janice Ahn, Rishu Verma, Renze Lou, Di Liu, Rui Zhang, Wenpeng Yin
0
0
Mathematical reasoning serves as a cornerstone for assessing the fundamental cognitive capabilities of human intelligence. In recent times, there has been a notable surge in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) geared towards the automated resolution of mathematical problems. However, the landscape of mathematical problem types is vast and varied, with LLM-oriented techniques undergoing evaluation across diverse datasets and settings. This diversity makes it challenging to discern the true advancements and obstacles within this burgeoning field. This survey endeavors to address four pivotal dimensions: i) a comprehensive exploration of the various mathematical problems and their corresponding datasets that have been investigated; ii) an examination of the spectrum of LLM-oriented techniques that have been proposed for mathematical problem-solving; iii) an overview of factors and concerns affecting LLMs in solving math; and iv) an elucidation of the persisting challenges within this domain. To the best of our knowledge, this survey stands as one of the first extensive examinations of the landscape of LLMs in the realm of mathematics, providing a holistic perspective on the current state, accomplishments, and future challenges in this rapidly evolving field.
4/8/2024
Assessing the Emergent Symbolic Reasoning Abilities of Llama Large Language Models
Flavio Petruzzellis, Alberto Testolin, Alessandro Sperduti
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve impressive performance in a wide range of tasks, even if they are often trained with the only objective of chatting fluently with users. Among other skills, LLMs show emergent abilities in mathematical reasoning benchmarks, which can be elicited with appropriate prompting methods. In this work, we systematically investigate the capabilities and limitations of popular open-source LLMs on different symbolic reasoning tasks. We evaluate three models of the Llama 2 family on two datasets that require solving mathematical formulas of varying degrees of difficulty. We test a generalist LLM (Llama 2 Chat) as well as two fine-tuned versions of Llama 2 (MAmmoTH and MetaMath) specifically designed to tackle mathematical problems. We observe that both increasing the scale of the model and fine-tuning it on relevant tasks lead to significant performance gains. Furthermore, using fine-grained evaluation measures, we find that such performance gains are mostly observed with mathematical formulas of low complexity, which nevertheless often remain challenging even for the largest fine-tuned models.
6/12/2024