Exploring Scaling Laws for Local SGD in Large Language Model Training

Read original: arXiv:2409.13198 - Published 9/23/2024 by Qiaozhi He, Xiaomin Zhuang, Zhihua Wu

💬

Overview

This paper explores the scaling laws of local SGD, a decentralized optimization method for training large language models.
The researchers investigate how the performance of local SGD scales with model size, dataset size, and communication frequency.
They provide theoretical and empirical results that shed light on the role of local steps and communication in the optimization process.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines how the performance of a decentralized training method called local SGD scales as the model size, dataset size, and communication frequency are varied. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/local-methods-adaptivity-via-scaling">Local SGD</a> is an optimization technique used to train large language models in a distributed way, where each worker performs some computation locally before sharing results with the others.

The key findings are:

Model size: Larger models benefit more from local SGD compared to smaller ones.
Dataset size: Local SGD performs better as the dataset size increases.
Communication frequency: There is an optimal level of communication, where too little or too much communication can hurt performance.

The researchers provide both theoretical analysis and empirical results to understand how these different factors impact the effectiveness of local SGD. This sheds light on the tradeoffs involved in distributed training of large-scale AI models.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a theoretical and empirical study of the scaling laws of local SGD, a decentralized optimization method for training large language models. The researchers analyze how the performance of local SGD scales with:

Model size: They show that larger models benefit more from local SGD compared to smaller ones. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/unraveling-mystery-scaling-laws-part-i">Scaling laws for large language models</a> suggest that local methods become increasingly important as models grow in size.
Dataset size: They find that local SGD performs better as the dataset size increases. This is because larger datasets allow for more meaningful local updates, which can then be effectively aggregated.
Communication frequency: The researchers identify an optimal level of communication, where too little or too much communication can hurt performance. Too little communication leads to the workers diverging, while too much communication negates the benefits of local updates.

The theoretical analysis provides insights into the role of local steps and communication in the optimization process. The empirical results on language modeling tasks validate the theoretical predictions and quantify the performance gains of local SGD over centralized SGD.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive study of the scaling laws of local SGD, with both theoretical and empirical components. The theoretical analysis is rigorous and the empirical results are convincing.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of local SGD:

Heterogeneous data: The analysis assumes that the data is uniformly distributed across workers. In practice, data may be unevenly distributed, which could impact the performance of local SGD.
Communication costs: The paper does not explicitly consider the communication overhead of local SGD, which could be significant, especially for large models.
Fault tolerance: The decentralized nature of local SGD may make it more vulnerable to worker failures or stragglers, which is not discussed.

Additionally, the paper could have provided more insight into the practical implications of the scaling laws, such as guidelines for hyperparameter tuning or recommendations for when to use local SGD over centralized training.

Conclusion

This paper makes important contributions to our understanding of the scaling laws of local SGD, a decentralized optimization method for training large language models. The key findings are that local SGD performs better as the model size and dataset size increase, but there is an optimal level of communication frequency that must be balanced.

The theoretical and empirical results provide valuable insights into the role of local steps and communication in the optimization process. This knowledge can help researchers and practitioners make more informed decisions when applying local SGD to the training of large-scale AI models.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

New!Exploring Scaling Laws for Local SGD in Large Language Model Training

Qiaozhi He, Xiaomin Zhuang, Zhihua Wu

This paper investigates scaling laws for local SGD in LLM training, a distributed optimization algorithm that facilitates training on loosely connected devices. Through extensive experiments, we show that local SGD achieves competitive results compared to conventional methods, given equivalent model parameters, datasets, and computational resources. Furthermore, we explore the application of local SGD in various practical scenarios, including multi-cluster setups and edge computing environments. Our findings elucidate the necessary conditions for effective multi-cluster LLM training and examine the potential and limitations of leveraging edge computing resources in the LLM training process. This demonstrates its viability as an alternative to single large-cluster training.

9/23/2024

Local Methods with Adaptivity via Scaling

Savelii Chezhegov, Sergey Skorik, Nikolas Khachaturov, Danil Shalagin, Aram Avetisyan, Martin Tak'av{c}, Yaroslav Kholodov, Aleksandr Beznosikov

The rapid development of machine learning and deep learning has introduced increasingly complex optimization challenges that must be addressed. Indeed, training modern, advanced models has become difficult to implement without leveraging multiple computing nodes in a distributed environment. Distributed optimization is also fundamental to emerging fields such as federated learning. Specifically, there is a need to organize the training process to minimize the time lost due to communication. A widely used and extensively researched technique to mitigate the communication bottleneck involves performing local training before communication. This approach is the focus of our paper. Concurrently, adaptive methods that incorporate scaling, notably led by Adam, have gained significant popularity in recent years. Therefore, this paper aims to merge the local training technique with the adaptive approach to develop efficient distributed learning methods. We consider the classical Local SGD method and enhance it with a scaling feature. A crucial aspect is that the scaling is described generically, allowing us to analyze various approaches, including Adam, RMSProp, and OASIS, in a unified manner. In addition to theoretical analysis, we validate the performance of our methods in practice by training a neural network.

9/17/2024

New!Rethinking Conventional Wisdom in Machine Learning: From Generalization to Scaling

Lechao Xiao

The remarkable success of large language pretraining and the discovery of scaling laws signify a paradigm shift in machine learning. Notably, the primary objective has evolved from minimizing generalization error to reducing approximation error, and the most effective strategy has transitioned from regularization (in a broad sense) to scaling up models. This raises a critical question: Do the established principles that proved successful in the generalization-centric era remain valid in this new era of scaling? This paper examines several influential regularization-based principles that may no longer hold true in the scaling-centric, large language model (LLM) era. These principles include explicit L2 regularization and implicit regularization through small batch sizes and large learning rates. Additionally, we identify a new phenomenon termed ``scaling law crossover,'' where two scaling curves intersect at a certain scale, implying that methods effective at smaller scales may not generalize to larger ones. Together, these observations highlight two fundamental questions within this new paradigm: $bullet$ Guiding Principles for Scaling: If regularization is no longer the primary guiding principle for model design, what new principles are emerging to guide scaling? $bullet$ Model Comparison at Scale: How to reliably and effectively compare models at the scale where only a single experiment is feasible?

9/24/2024

New!Asynchronous Local-SGD Training for Language Modeling

Bo Liu, Rachita Chhaparia, Arthur Douillard, Satyen Kale, Andrei A. Rusu, Jiajun Shen, Arthur Szlam, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato

Local stochastic gradient descent (Local-SGD), also referred to as federated averaging, is an approach to distributed optimization where each device performs more than one SGD update per communication. This work presents an empirical study of {it asynchronous} Local-SGD for training language models; that is, each worker updates the global parameters as soon as it has finished its SGD steps. We conduct a comprehensive investigation by examining how worker hardware heterogeneity, model size, number of workers, and optimizer could impact the learning performance. We find that with naive implementations, asynchronous Local-SGD takes more iterations to converge than its synchronous counterpart despite updating the (global) model parameters more frequently. We identify momentum acceleration on the global parameters when worker gradients are stale as a key challenge. We propose a novel method that utilizes a delayed Nesterov momentum update and adjusts the workers' local training steps based on their computation speed. This approach, evaluated with models up to 150M parameters on the C4 dataset, matches the performance of synchronous Local-SGD in terms of perplexity per update step, and significantly surpasses it in terms of wall clock time.

9/24/2024