Exploring Syntactic Patterns in Urdu: A Deep Dive into Dependency Analysis

Read original: arXiv:2406.09549 - Published 6/17/2024 by Nudrat Habib
Total Score

0

🌀

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Parsing is the process of breaking down a sentence into its grammatical components and identifying its syntactic structure.
  • Parsers are crucial for various language-based applications like name entity recognition, question-answering systems, and information extraction.
  • Two common parsing techniques are phrase structure and dependency structure.
  • Urdu, a South Asian language, has complex morphology, so building an Urdu parser has been challenging.
  • Researchers have made progress in Urdu dependency parsing by using a basic feature model and then exploring more complex models.

Plain English Explanation

Parsing is like taking a sentence apart to figure out how it's structured. It's an important process for all kinds of language-based computer programs, like ones that recognize names in text, answer questions, or extract information.

There are a few different ways to do parsing. One is to look at the sentence in terms of its overall structure, like the main parts of speech and how they fit together. Another approach is to focus on the relationships between individual words, where each word depends on the others around it.

Urdu is a language spoken in South Asia that has a lot of complexity in how words are formed. This has made it challenging to build good Urdu parsing systems. But researchers have been making progress by starting with some basic information about Urdu grammar and then trying out more advanced techniques.

Technical Explanation

The researchers have explored dependency parsing as a promising approach for Urdu, as it is well-suited for the relatively free word order of the language. They began with a basic feature model based on word location, word head, and dependency relation, and then tested more sophisticated feature models.

The researchers developed a dependency tag set of 22 tags after carefully considering Urdu's complex morphological structure, word order variation, and lexical ambiguity. They compiled a dataset of Urdu sentences from news articles, aiming to include sentences of varying complexity to get reliable results.

The experiments were conducted using the MaltParser system, exploring all 9 of its algorithms and classifiers. The best results achieved a 70% labeled accuracy and an 84% unlabeled attachment score using the Nivre-eager algorithm. The researchers then compared the parser's output to manually parsed treebank data to assess errors and identify areas for improvement.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge the challenges of building a robust Urdu parser, given the language's complex morphology and flexible word order. While they have made significant progress, there is still room for improvement in the accuracy and robustness of the parser.

One limitation mentioned is the difficulty of including sentences with diverse complexity in the dataset. Nonce dependency treebanks could be a useful approach to further test the parser's capabilities.

Additionally, the researchers note that lexical ambiguity remains a significant source of errors for the Urdu parser. Exploring more advanced language modeling techniques may help address this issue.

Overall, the researchers have made a valuable contribution to the field of Urdu natural language processing. Their work demonstrates the potential of dependency parsing for order-free languages and provides a foundation for future improvements and applications.

Conclusion

This research represents an important step forward in Urdu dependency parsing, a crucial task for various language-based applications. By developing a robust Urdu dependency parser, the researchers have laid the groundwork for more advanced natural language processing capabilities in this South Asian language.

The insights gained from this work, such as the effectiveness of dependency parsing for order-free languages and the importance of modeling lexical ambiguity, may also have broader implications for the field of computational linguistics. As the researchers continue to refine and expand their Urdu parsing system, it will be interesting to see how it can be applied to real-world problems and how it compares to advancements in multilingual parsing.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🌀

Total Score

0

Exploring Syntactic Patterns in Urdu: A Deep Dive into Dependency Analysis

Nudrat Habib

Parsing is the process of breaking a sentence into its grammatical components and identifying the syntactic structure of the sentence. The syntactically correct sentence structure is achieved by assigning grammatical labels to its constituents using lexicon and syntactic rules. In linguistics, parser is extremely useful due to the number of different applications like name entity recognition, QA systems and information extraction, etc. The two most common techniques used for parsing are phrase structure and dependency Structure. Because Urdu is a low-resource language, there has been little progress in building an Urdu parser. A comparison of several parsers revealed that the dependency parsing approach is better suited for order-free languages such as Urdu. We have made significant progress in parsing Urdu, a South Asian language with a complex morphology. For Urdu dependency parsing, a basic feature model consisting of word location, word head, and dependency relation is employed as a starting point, followed by more complex feature models. The dependency tagset is designed after careful consideration of the complex morphological structure of the Urdu language, word order variation, and lexical ambiguity and it contains 22 tags. Our dataset comprises of sentences from news articles, and we tried to include sentences of different complexity (which is quite challenging), to get reliable results. All experiments are performed using MaltParser, exploring all 9 algorithms and classifiers. We have achieved a 70 percent overall best-labeled accuracy (LA), as well as an 84 percent overall best-unlabeled attachment score (UAS) using the Nivreeager algorithm. The comparison of output data with treebank test data that has been manually parsed is then used to carry out error assessment and to identify the errors produced by the parser.

Read more

6/17/2024

Empirical Analysis for Unsupervised Universal Dependency Parse Tree Aggregation
Total Score

0

Empirical Analysis for Unsupervised Universal Dependency Parse Tree Aggregation

Adithya Kulkarni, Oliver Eulenstein, Qi Li

Dependency parsing is an essential task in NLP, and the quality of dependency parsers is crucial for many downstream tasks. Parsers' quality often varies depending on the domain and the language involved. Therefore, it is essential to combat the issue of varying quality to achieve stable performance. In various NLP tasks, aggregation methods are used for post-processing aggregation and have been shown to combat the issue of varying quality. However, aggregation methods for post-processing aggregation have not been sufficiently studied in dependency parsing tasks. In an extensive empirical study, we compare different unsupervised post-processing aggregation methods to identify the most suitable dependency tree structure aggregation method.

Read more

4/4/2024

🌿

Total Score

0

Revisiting Structured Sentiment Analysis as Latent Dependency Graph Parsing

Chengjie Zhou, Bobo Li, Hao Fei, Fei Li, Chong Teng, Donghong Ji

Structured Sentiment Analysis (SSA) was cast as a problem of bi-lexical dependency graph parsing by prior studies. Multiple formulations have been proposed to construct the graph, which share several intrinsic drawbacks: (1) The internal structures of spans are neglected, thus only the boundary tokens of spans are used for relation prediction and span recognition, thus hindering the model's expressiveness; (2) Long spans occupy a significant proportion in the SSA datasets, which further exacerbates the problem of internal structure neglect. In this paper, we treat the SSA task as a dependency parsing task on partially-observed dependency trees, regarding flat spans without determined tree annotations as latent subtrees to consider internal structures of spans. We propose a two-stage parsing method and leverage TreeCRFs with a novel constrained inside algorithm to model latent structures explicitly, which also takes advantages of joint scoring graph arcs and headed spans for global optimization and inference. Results of extensive experiments on five benchmark datasets reveal that our method performs significantly better than all previous bi-lexical methods, achieving new state-of-the-art.

Read more

7/9/2024

A Novel Dependency Framework for Enhancing Discourse Data Analysis
Total Score

0

A Novel Dependency Framework for Enhancing Discourse Data Analysis

Kun Sun, Rong Wang

The development of different theories of discourse structure has led to the establishment of discourse corpora based on these theories. However, the existence of discourse corpora established on different theoretical bases creates challenges when it comes to exploring them in a consistent and cohesive way. This study has as its primary focus the conversion of PDTB annotations into dependency structures. It employs refined BERT-based discourse parsers to test the validity of the dependency data derived from the PDTB-style corpora in English, Chinese, and several other languages. By converting both PDTB and RST annotations for the same texts into dependencies, this study also applies ``dependency distance'' metrics to examine the correlation between RST dependencies and PDTB dependencies in English. The results show that the PDTB dependency data is valid and that there is a strong correlation between the two types of dependency distance. This study presents a comprehensive approach for analyzing and evaluating discourse corpora by employing discourse dependencies to achieve unified analysis. By applying dependency representations, we can extract data from PDTB, RST, and SDRT corpora in a coherent and unified manner. Moreover, the cross-linguistic validation establishes the framework's generalizability beyond English. The establishment of this comprehensive dependency framework overcomes limitations of existing discourse corpora, supporting a diverse range of algorithms and facilitating further studies in computational discourse analysis and language sciences.

Read more

7/18/2024