Multilingual Nonce Dependency Treebanks: Understanding how Language Models represent and process syntactic structure

Overview

• Introduces SPUD (Semantically Perturbed Universal Dependencies), a framework for creating nonce treebanks for the multilingual Universal Dependencies (UD) corpora
• SPUD data satisfies syntactic argument structure, provides syntactic annotations, and ensures grammaticality via language-specific rules
• Creates nonce data in Arabic, English, French, German, and Russian
• Demonstrates two use cases of SPUD treebanks:
  1. Investigating the effect of nonce data on word co-occurrence statistics, as measured by perplexity scores of autoregressive (ALM) and masked language models (MLM)
  2. Showing how nonce data affects the performance of syntactic dependency probes

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new framework called SPUD (Semantically Perturbed Universal Dependencies) that can generate synthetic, or "nonce," data for multilingual Universal Dependencies (UD) corpora. UD corpora are collections of text data that have been annotated with information about the grammatical structure of the sentences.

The SPUD framework ensures that the synthetic data it generates follows the rules of the language's syntax and argument structure, while also being grammatically correct. The researchers create nonce data in five different languages: Arabic, English, French, German, and Russian.

The paper then demonstrates two ways the SPUD treebanks can be used. First, they examine how the nonce data affects the performance of language models, which are AI systems that can predict the next word in a sequence of text. They find that autoregressive language models (ALMs), which predict words sequentially, are more affected by the nonce data than masked language models (MLMs), which predict words based on the surrounding context.

Second, the researchers show how the nonce data can be used to test how well language models have learned the underlying syntactic structure of the language, using a technique called "syntactic dependency probes." They find that the probes' performance declines when tested on the nonce data, compared to the original test data, but that a significant portion of the performance is still maintained, suggesting the probes have learned syntax independent of semantics.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces SPUD (Semantically Perturbed Universal Dependencies), a framework for creating nonce treebanks for the multilingual Universal Dependencies (UD) corpora. The SPUD data satisfies syntactic argument structure, provides syntactic annotations, and ensures grammaticality via language-specific rules. The researchers create nonce data in Arabic, English, French, German, and Russian.

The paper demonstrates two use cases of SPUD treebanks. First, they investigate the effect of nonce data on word co-occurrence statistics, as measured by perplexity scores of autoregressive (ALM) and masked language models (MLM). They find that ALM scores are significantly more affected by nonce data than MLM scores.

Second, the researchers show how nonce data affects the performance of syntactic dependency probes. They replicate the findings of Muller-Eberstein et al. (2022) on nonce test data and demonstrate that the probe's performance declines on both MLMs and ALMs compared to the original test data. However, a majority of the performance is kept, suggesting that the probe indeed learns syntax independently from semantics.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-designed framework for creating nonce treebanks, which can be a valuable tool for evaluating language models and probing their syntactic capabilities. The use of language-specific rules to ensure grammaticality is a particularly strong aspect of the SPUD framework.

One potential limitation is the relatively small number of languages included (5). While this is reasonable for a proof-of-concept study, expanding the framework to a wider range of languages would further demonstrate its utility and generalizability.

Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore the potential reasons for the differential impact of nonce data on ALMs versus MLMs. Further investigation into the underlying mechanisms behind this observation could provide valuable insights into the inner workings of these language models.

The researchers' findings on the syntactic dependency probes are intriguing, but more work is needed to fully understand the relationship between syntax and semantics in these models. Exploring alternative probe designs or evaluation methods could shed additional light on this important question.

Conclusion

The SPUD framework introduced in this paper represents a significant contribution to the field of language model benchmarking and syntactic analysis. By generating high-quality nonce data that tests the syntactic capabilities of language models, the researchers have provided a valuable tool for advancing our understanding of how these models learn and represent linguistic structure.

The findings on the differential impact of nonce data on ALMs and MLMs, as well as the insights into syntactic dependency probes, suggest that the SPUD framework can be a powerful means of probing the inner workings of large language models and their capacity for understanding spoken language. As the field of natural language processing continues to evolve, tools like SPUD will be essential for ensuring the development of robust and linguistically-informed language models.