FairLENS: Assessing Fairness in Law Enforcement Speech Recognition
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes FairLENS, a framework for assessing fairness in speech recognition systems used by law enforcement.
- The researchers evaluate the performance of several popular speech recognition models on a diverse dataset, analyzing how well they perform across different demographic groups.
- They find significant disparities in accuracy, highlighting the need for more inclusive and equitable speech recognition technology in critical applications like law enforcement.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at the fairness of speech recognition systems used by law enforcement agencies. Speech recognition is a technology that allows computers to convert spoken language into text. The researchers evaluated how well several popular speech recognition models performed on a diverse dataset, focusing on differences in accuracy across demographic groups like age, gender, and race.
They found that the speech recognition models had significant disparities in accuracy - some groups, like younger people or those with certain accents, experienced much higher error rates compared to others. This is an important issue, as these speech recognition systems are used in important law enforcement contexts like recording interviews or transcribing emergency calls. If the technology isn't equally accurate for everyone, it could lead to unfair or biased outcomes.
The paper proposes a framework called FairLENS to help assess the fairness of these speech recognition models. By rigorously testing them on diverse datasets, researchers and developers can identify and address these demographic biases, working to make the technology more equitable and inclusive. This is an important step towards ensuring these critical systems treat everyone fairly, regardless of their background.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed FairLENS, a framework for evaluating the fairness of speech recognition systems used in law enforcement applications. They tested several popular speech recognition models, including Comparison of Differential Performance Metrics in Evaluation of Automatic Speaker, Effective Automated Speaking Assessment: An Approach to Mitigating, and Closing the Gap: A Trade-off between Fair Representations, on a diverse dataset to analyze their performance across different demographic groups.
The results showed significant disparities in accuracy, with some models performing much worse for certain groups like Are Models Trained on Indian Legal Data Fair? or Formal Specification and Assessment of Enforcement of Fairness in Generative AIs. This highlights the need for more inclusive and equitable speech recognition technology, especially in high-stakes applications like law enforcement.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable framework for assessing fairness in speech recognition systems, but it acknowledges several limitations. The dataset used, while diverse, may not be fully representative of all the populations these systems would need to serve. Additionally, the analysis focuses on demographic factors like age, gender, and race, but there may be other sources of bias, such as accent or language background, that were not explored.
Further research is needed to fully understand the scope and causes of these disparities, as well as to develop effective strategies for mitigating them. The authors suggest that a combination of technical improvements, such as more inclusive training data and fairness-aware model architectures, along with policy and oversight measures, will be necessary to ensure these critical technologies are fair and equitable for all users.
Conclusion
The FairLENS framework presented in this paper is an important step towards understanding and addressing the fairness challenges in speech recognition systems used by law enforcement. By rigorously evaluating the performance of these models across diverse demographics, the researchers have highlighted significant disparities that could lead to biased and unfair outcomes. Addressing these issues is crucial for ensuring that these critical technologies treat everyone equitably, regardless of their background. The insights from this research can inform the development of more inclusive and fair speech recognition systems, ultimately contributing to more just and equitable law enforcement practices.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
FairLENS: Assessing Fairness in Law Enforcement Speech Recognition
Yicheng Wang, Mark Cusick, Mohamed Laila, Kate Puech, Zhengping Ji, Xia Hu, Michael Wilson, Noah Spitzer-Williams, Bryan Wheeler, Yasser Ibrahim
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) techniques have become powerful tools, enhancing efficiency in law enforcement scenarios. To ensure fairness for demographic groups in different acoustic environments, ASR engines must be tested across a variety of speakers in realistic settings. However, describing the fairness discrepancies between models with confidence remains a challenge. Meanwhile, most public ASR datasets are insufficient to perform a satisfying fairness evaluation. To address the limitations, we built FairLENS - a systematic fairness evaluation framework. We propose a novel and adaptable evaluation method to examine the fairness disparity between different models. We also collected a fairness evaluation dataset covering multiple scenarios and demographic dimensions. Leveraging this framework, we conducted fairness assessments on 1 open-source and 11 commercially available state-of-the-art ASR models. Our results reveal that certain models exhibit more biases than others, serving as a fairness guideline for users to make informed choices when selecting ASR models for a given real-world scenario. We further explored model biases towards specific demographic groups and observed that shifts in the acoustic domain can lead to the emergence of new biases.
Read more5/30/2024
0
Towards measuring fairness in speech recognition: Fair-Speech dataset
Irina-Elena Veliche, Zhuangqun Huang, Vineeth Ayyat Kochaniyan, Fuchun Peng, Ozlem Kalinli, Michael L. Seltzer
The current public datasets for speech recognition (ASR) tend not to focus specifically on the fairness aspect, such as performance across different demographic groups. This paper introduces a novel dataset, Fair-Speech, a publicly released corpus to help researchers evaluate their ASR models for accuracy across a diverse set of self-reported demographic information, such as age, gender, ethnicity, geographic variation and whether the participants consider themselves native English speakers. Our dataset includes approximately 26.5K utterances in recorded speech by 593 people in the United States, who were paid to record and submit audios of themselves saying voice commands. We also provide ASR baselines, including on models trained on transcribed and untranscribed social media videos and open source models.
Read more8/26/2024
🗣️
0
Examining the Interplay Between Privacy and Fairness for Speech Processing: A Review and Perspective
Anna Leschanowsky, Sneha Das
Speech technology has been increasingly deployed in various areas of daily life including sensitive domains such as healthcare and law enforcement. For these technologies to be effective, they must work reliably for all users while preserving individual privacy. Although tradeoffs between privacy and utility, as well as fairness and utility, have been extensively researched, the specific interplay between privacy and fairness in speech processing remains underexplored. This review and position paper offers an overview of emerging privacy-fairness tradeoffs throughout the entire machine learning lifecycle for speech processing. By drawing on well-established frameworks on fairness and privacy, we examine existing biases and sources of privacy harm that coexist during the development of speech processing models. We then highlight how corresponding privacy-enhancing technologies have the potential to inadvertently increase these biases and how bias mitigation strategies may conversely reduce privacy. By raising open questions, we advocate for a comprehensive evaluation of privacy-fairness tradeoffs for speech technology and the development of privacy-enhancing and fairness-aware algorithms in this domain.
Read more9/6/2024
🚀
0
A Comparison of Differential Performance Metrics for the Evaluation of Automatic Speaker Verification Fairness
Oubaida Chouchane, Christoph Busch, Chiara Galdi, Nicholas Evans, Massimiliano Todisco
When decisions are made and when personal data is treated by automated processes, there is an expectation of fairness -- that members of different demographic groups receive equitable treatment. This expectation applies to biometric systems such as automatic speaker verification (ASV). We present a comparison of three candidate fairness metrics and extend previous work performed for face recognition, by examining differential performance across a range of different ASV operating points. Results show that the Gini Aggregation Rate for Biometric Equitability (GARBE) is the only one which meets three functional fairness measure criteria. Furthermore, a comprehensive evaluation of the fairness and verification performance of five state-of-the-art ASV systems is also presented. Our findings reveal a nuanced trade-off between fairness and verification accuracy underscoring the complex interplay between system design, demographic inclusiveness, and verification reliability.
Read more4/30/2024