Fast leave-one-cluster-out cross-validation by clustered Network Information Criteria (NICc)

Read original: arXiv:2405.20400 - Published 6/3/2024 by Jiaxing Qiu, Douglas E. Lake, Teague R. Henry
Total Score

0

Fast leave-one-cluster-out cross-validation by clustered Network Information Criteria (NICc)

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a fast leave-one-cluster-out cross-validation method using a clustered version of the Network Information Criteria (NICc).
  • The NICc is a model selection criterion that accounts for the network structure in the data.
  • The proposed approach allows for efficient cross-validation of models without the need to refit the model for each held-out cluster.

Plain English Explanation

When developing machine learning models, it's important to thoroughly evaluate their performance to ensure they generalize well to new data. Cross-validation is a common technique for this, where the model is trained on a subset of the data and then tested on the held-out portion. This process is repeated multiple times to get a more robust estimate of model performance.

However, for datasets with a natural clustering structure, the standard cross-validation approaches may not be sufficient. This paper introduces a new method, called clustered NICc, that takes the clustering of the data into account when performing cross-validation.

The key idea is to leave out entire clusters of data during the cross-validation process, rather than just individual data points. This can be much more efficient, especially when the clusters are large, as the model doesn't need to be retrained from scratch for each held-out cluster.

The authors show that their approach, called "fast leave-one-cluster-out cross-validation," can provide accurate estimates of model performance while being computationally much faster than traditional methods. This can be especially useful when working with large or complex datasets where cross-validation can be computationally expensive.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a fast leave-one-cluster-out cross-validation method that leverages the clustered Network Information Criteria (NICc) for model selection.

The NICc is a model selection criterion that accounts for the network structure in the data. It provides a way to evaluate the quality of a model while considering the underlying relationships between the variables.

The key innovation in this paper is the development of a clustered version of the NICc, which allows for efficient cross-validation of models. Instead of performing a standard leave-one-out cross-validation, where each individual data point is held out, the authors propose leaving out entire clusters of data points.

This approach is computationally more efficient because the model does not need to be retrained from scratch for each held-out cluster. Instead, the authors show how the NICc can be decomposed in a way that allows the cross-validation score to be calculated without refitting the model.

The paper includes theoretical analysis and empirical evaluations demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method. The authors show that the clustered NICc cross-validation can provide accurate estimates of model performance while being much faster than traditional cross-validation techniques, especially for large or complex datasets.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach for efficient cross-validation of models on datasets with a natural clustering structure. The authors provide a strong theoretical foundation and empirical validation of their method.

One potential limitation of the approach is that it assumes the existence of a clear clustering structure in the data, which may not always be the case. In situations where the clustering is less well-defined, the benefits of the clustered NICc cross-validation may be diminished.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the performance of the method in the presence of large or complex cluster structures, which could introduce additional computational challenges. Further research may be needed to understand the scalability and robustness of the approach in such scenarios.

The paper also does not discuss the potential implications of the approximations used to compute the Fisher information metric within the NICc framework. These approximations may introduce additional sources of error that could impact the accuracy of the cross-validation results.

Overall, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of model selection and cross-validation, especially for datasets with a clear clustering structure. The fast leave-one-cluster-out cross-validation method could be a useful tool for researchers and practitioners working with large or complex datasets.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a fast leave-one-cluster-out cross-validation method that leverages the clustered Network Information Criteria (NICc) for model selection. The proposed approach allows for efficient cross-validation of models by taking the natural clustering structure of the data into account, without the need to refit the model for each held-out cluster.

The authors provide a strong theoretical foundation and empirical validation of their method, demonstrating its effectiveness in providing accurate estimates of model performance while being computationally much faster than traditional cross-validation techniques. This can be particularly useful when working with large or complex datasets where cross-validation can be computationally expensive.

The paper represents a valuable contribution to the field of model selection and cross-validation, and the fast leave-one-cluster-out cross-validation method could be a useful tool for researchers and practitioners working with data that exhibits a clear clustering structure.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Fast leave-one-cluster-out cross-validation by clustered Network Information Criteria (NICc)
Total Score

0

Fast leave-one-cluster-out cross-validation by clustered Network Information Criteria (NICc)

Jiaxing Qiu, Douglas E. Lake, Teague R. Henry

This paper introduced a clustered estimator of the Network Information Criterion (NICc) to approximate leave-one-cluster-out cross-validated deviance, which can be used as an alternative to cluster-based cross-validation when modeling clustered data. Stone proved that Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) is an asymptotic equivalence to leave-one-observation-out cross-validation if the parametric model is true. Ripley pointed out that the Network Information Criterion (NIC) derived in Stone's proof, is a better approximation to leave-one-observation-out cross-validation when the model is not true. For clustered data, we derived a clustered estimator of NIC, referred to as NICc, by substituting the Fisher information matrix in NIC with its estimator that adjusts for clustering. This adjustment imposes a larger penalty in NICc than the unclustered estimator of NIC when modeling clustered data, thereby preventing overfitting more effectively. In a simulation study and an empirical example, we used linear and logistic regression to model clustered data with Gaussian or binomial response, respectively. We showed that NICc is a better approximation to leave-one-cluster-out deviance and prevents overfitting more effectively than AIC and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). NICc leads to more accurate model selection, as determined by cluster-based cross-validation, compared to AIC and BIC.

Read more

6/3/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Optimizer's Information Criterion: Dissecting and Correcting Bias in Data-Driven Optimization

Garud Iyengar, Henry Lam, Tianyu Wang

In data-driven optimization, the sample performance of the obtained decision typically incurs an optimistic bias against the true performance, a phenomenon commonly known as the Optimizer's Curse and intimately related to overfitting in machine learning. Common techniques to correct this bias, such as cross-validation, require repeatedly solving additional optimization problems and are therefore computationally expensive. We develop a general bias correction approach, building on what we call Optimizer's Information Criterion (OIC), that directly approximates the first-order bias and does not require solving any additional optimization problems. Our OIC generalizes the celebrated Akaike Information Criterion to evaluate the objective performance in data-driven optimization, which crucially involves not only model fitting but also its interplay with the downstream optimization. As such it can be used for decision selection instead of only model selection. We apply our approach to a range of data-driven optimization formulations comprising empirical and parametric models, their regularized counterparts, and furthermore contextual optimization. Finally, we provide numerical validation on the superior performance of our approach under synthetic and real-world datasets.

Read more

7/25/2024

📉

Total Score

0

On uncertainty-penalized Bayesian information criterion

Pongpisit Thanasutives, Ken-ichi Fukui

The uncertainty-penalized information criterion (UBIC) has been proposed as a new model-selection criterion for data-driven partial differential equation (PDE) discovery. In this paper, we show that using the UBIC is equivalent to employing the conventional BIC to a set of overparameterized models derived from the potential regression models of different complexity measures. The result indicates that the asymptotic property of the UBIC and BIC holds indifferently.

Read more

4/29/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Distributional bias compromises leave-one-out cross-validation

George I. Austin, Itsik Pe'er, Tal Korem

Cross-validation is a common method for estimating the predictive performance of machine learning models. In a data-scarce regime, where one typically wishes to maximize the number of instances used for training the model, an approach called leave-one-out cross-validation is often used. In this design, a separate model is built for predicting each data instance after training on all other instances. Since this results in a single test data point available per model trained, predictions are aggregated across the entire dataset to calculate common rank-based performance metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic or precision-recall curves. In this work, we demonstrate that this approach creates a negative correlation between the average label of each training fold and the label of its corresponding test instance, a phenomenon that we term distributional bias. As machine learning models tend to regress to the mean of their training data, this distributional bias tends to negatively impact performance evaluation and hyperparameter optimization. We show that this effect generalizes to leave-P-out cross-validation and persists across a wide range of modeling and evaluation approaches, and that it can lead to a bias against stronger regularization. To address this, we propose a generalizable rebalanced cross-validation approach that corrects for distributional bias. We demonstrate that our approach improves cross-validation performance evaluation in synthetic simulations and in several published leave-one-out analyses.

Read more

6/5/2024