On uncertainty-penalized Bayesian information criterion
2404.16881
0
0
📉
Abstract
The uncertainty-penalized information criterion (UBIC) has been proposed as a new model-selection criterion for data-driven partial differential equation (PDE) discovery. In this paper, we show that using the UBIC is equivalent to employing the conventional BIC to a set of overparameterized models derived from the potential regression models of different complexity measures. The result indicates that the asymptotic property of the UBIC and BIC holds indifferently.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines the use of the uncertainty-penalized information criterion (UBIC) as a model-selection criterion for data-driven partial differential equation (PDE) discovery.
- It shows that using the UBIC is equivalent to employing the conventional Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) on a set of overparameterized models derived from potential regression models of different complexity measures.
- The findings indicate that the asymptotic properties of the UBIC and BIC hold indifferently.
Plain English Explanation
When researchers are trying to discover or model partial differential equations (PDEs) from data, they need a way to choose the best model among several candidates. The uncertainty-penalized information criterion (UBIC) was proposed as a new way to do this.
This paper shows that using the UBIC is actually the same as using the well-known Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), but on a set of more complex models. The BIC is a standard way to balance model fit and complexity when selecting the best model.
The key insight is that the UBIC approach is equivalent to taking the potential regression models of different complexity and treating them as a set of overparameterized models. Then applying the BIC to choose the best one.
This means the UBIC and BIC have the same underlying statistical properties when it comes to model selection for PDE discovery.
Technical Explanation
The paper demonstrates that using the uncertainty-penalized information criterion (UBIC) as a model-selection criterion for data-driven partial differential equation (PDE) discovery is mathematically equivalent to employing the conventional Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) on a set of overparameterized models.
Specifically, the potential regression models of different complexity measures used in the UBIC approach can be reframed as a set of overparameterized models. Applying the BIC to this set of models yields the same results as using the UBIC directly.
The authors prove this equivalence by establishing the asymptotic properties of the UBIC, showing that it behaves identically to the BIC under large sample sizes. This implies that the model-selection performance of the two criteria is indistinguishable asymptotically.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis demonstrating the underlying mathematical relationship between the UBIC and BIC model-selection approaches. This is a valuable contribution, as it clarifies the statistical foundations of the UBIC and how it compares to the widely-used BIC.
One potential limitation is that the analysis is focused on the asymptotic regime, where sample sizes are very large. It would be helpful to understand the finite-sample properties and potential differences between the UBIC and BIC in more realistic scenarios with moderate data availability.
Additionally, the paper does not provide any empirical comparisons or case studies illustrating the practical implications of this theoretical result. Seeing how the UBIC and BIC perform on actual PDE discovery tasks would help readers better appreciate the significance of the findings.
Overall, this work takes an important step in rigorously analyzing the statistical underpinnings of the UBIC approach. Further empirical validation and exploration of the finite-sample behavior could strengthen the practical relevance of these insights.
Conclusion
This paper establishes a fundamental connection between the uncertainty-penalized information criterion (UBIC) and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) for model selection in data-driven partial differential equation (PDE) discovery.
The key result is that using the UBIC is mathematically equivalent to applying the BIC to a set of overparameterized models derived from potential regression models of different complexity. This implies the two criteria have the same asymptotic properties and model-selection performance.
These findings clarify the statistical foundations of the UBIC approach and situate it within the broader context of established model-selection methods like the BIC. This lays the groundwork for further research and refinement of techniques for data-driven PDE discovery, a critical area for fields like fluid dynamics, materials science, and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Minimizing UCB: a Better Local Search Strategy in Local Bayesian Optimization
Zheyi Fan, Wenyu Wang, Szu Hui Ng, Qingpei Hu
0
0
Local Bayesian optimization is a promising practical approach to solve the high dimensional black-box function optimization problem. Among them is the approximated gradient class of methods, which implements a strategy similar to gradient descent. These methods have achieved good experimental results and theoretical guarantees. However, given the distributional properties of the Gaussian processes applied on these methods, there may be potential to further exploit the information of the Gaussian processes to facilitate the BO search. In this work, we develop the relationship between the steps of the gradient descent method and one that minimizes the Upper Confidence Bound (UCB), and show that the latter can be a better strategy than direct gradient descent when a Gaussian process is applied as a surrogate. Through this insight, we propose a new local Bayesian optimization algorithm, MinUCB, which replaces the gradient descent step with minimizing UCB in GIBO. We further show that MinUCB maintains a similar convergence rate with GIBO. We then improve the acquisition function of MinUCB further through a look ahead strategy, and obtain a more efficient algorithm LA-MinUCB. We apply our algorithms on different synthetic and real-world functions, and the results show the effectiveness of our method. Our algorithms also illustrate improvements on local search strategies from an upper bound perspective in Bayesian optimization, and provides a new direction for future algorithm design.
5/27/2024
Leveraging viscous Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs for uncertainty quantification in scientific machine learning
Zongren Zou, Tingwei Meng, Paula Chen, J'er^ome Darbon, George Em Karniadakis
0
0
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in scientific machine learning (SciML) combines the powerful predictive power of SciML with methods for quantifying the reliability of the learned models. However, two major challenges remain: limited interpretability and expensive training procedures. We provide a new interpretation for UQ problems by establishing a new theoretical connection between some Bayesian inference problems arising in SciML and viscous Hamilton-Jacobi partial differential equations (HJ PDEs). Namely, we show that the posterior mean and covariance can be recovered from the spatial gradient and Hessian of the solution to a viscous HJ PDE. As a first exploration of this connection, we specialize to Bayesian inference problems with linear models, Gaussian likelihoods, and Gaussian priors. In this case, the associated viscous HJ PDEs can be solved using Riccati ODEs, and we develop a new Riccati-based methodology that provides computational advantages when continuously updating the model predictions. Specifically, our Riccati-based approach can efficiently add or remove data points to the training set invariant to the order of the data and continuously tune hyperparameters. Moreover, neither update requires retraining on or access to previously incorporated data. We provide several examples from SciML involving noisy data and textit{epistemic uncertainty} to illustrate the potential advantages of our approach. In particular, this approach's amenability to data streaming applications demonstrates its potential for real-time inferences, which, in turn, allows for applications in which the predicted uncertainty is used to dynamically alter the learning process.
4/16/2024
🛠️
Heteroscedastic Preferential Bayesian Optimization with Informative Noise Distributions
Marshal Arijona Sinaga, Julien Martinelli, Vikas Garg, Samuel Kaski
0
0
Preferential Bayesian optimization (PBO) is a sample-efficient framework for learning human preferences between candidate designs. PBO classically relies on homoscedastic noise models to represent human aleatoric uncertainty. Yet, such noise fails to accurately capture the varying levels of human aleatoric uncertainty, particularly when the user possesses partial knowledge among different pairs of candidates. For instance, a chemist with solid expertise in glucose-related molecules may easily compare two compounds from that family while struggling to compare alcohol-related molecules. Currently, PBO overlooks this uncertainty during the search for a new candidate through the maximization of the acquisition function, consequently underestimating the risk associated with human uncertainty. To address this issue, we propose a heteroscedastic noise model to capture human aleatoric uncertainty. This model adaptively assigns noise levels based on the distance of a specific input to a predefined set of reliable inputs known as anchors provided by the human. Anchors encapsulate partial knowledge and offer insight into the comparative difficulty of evaluating different candidate pairs. Such a model can be seamlessly integrated into the acquisition function, thus leading to candidate design pairs that elegantly trade informativeness and ease of comparison for the human expert. We perform an extensive empirical evaluation of the proposed approach, demonstrating a consistent improvement over homoscedastic PBO.
5/24/2024
Fast leave-one-cluster-out cross-validation by clustered Network Information Criteria (NICc)
Jiaxing Qiu, Douglas E. Lake, Teague R. Henry
0
0
This paper introduced a clustered estimator of the Network Information Criterion (NICc) to approximate leave-one-cluster-out cross-validated deviance, which can be used as an alternative to cluster-based cross-validation when modeling clustered data. Stone proved that Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) is an asymptotic equivalence to leave-one-observation-out cross-validation if the parametric model is true. Ripley pointed out that the Network Information Criterion (NIC) derived in Stone's proof, is a better approximation to leave-one-observation-out cross-validation when the model is not true. For clustered data, we derived a clustered estimator of NIC, referred to as NICc, by substituting the Fisher information matrix in NIC with its estimator that adjusts for clustering. This adjustment imposes a larger penalty in NICc than the unclustered estimator of NIC when modeling clustered data, thereby preventing overfitting more effectively. In a simulation study and an empirical example, we used linear and logistic regression to model clustered data with Gaussian or binomial response, respectively. We showed that NICc is a better approximation to leave-one-cluster-out deviance and prevents overfitting more effectively than AIC and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). NICc leads to more accurate model selection, as determined by cluster-based cross-validation, compared to AIC and BIC.
6/3/2024