Fast Optimizer Benchmark
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a benchmark for fast and accurate optimization of hyperparameters for large-scale machine learning models.
- The benchmark, called the Fast Optimizer Benchmark (FOB), evaluates the performance of optimizers on a range of challenging optimization problems.
- The authors compare several state-of-the-art optimization algorithms, including Context Freeze-Thaw Bayesian Optimization, Revisiting Zeroth-Order Optimization, and Automating Code Adaptation for MLOps.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a new benchmark for evaluating different optimization algorithms, which are the methods used to fine-tune the parameters of large machine learning models. Tuning these parameters is crucial for getting the best performance out of these models, but it can be a time-consuming and challenging process.
The Fast Optimizer Benchmark (FOB) is designed to test how well various optimization algorithms can quickly and accurately find the optimal parameters for a range of different optimization problems. The authors compare several state-of-the-art optimization techniques, including some novel approaches like Context Freeze-Thaw Bayesian Optimization and Revisiting Zeroth-Order Optimization.
The goal is to identify the optimization algorithms that can most efficiently tune the parameters of large machine learning models, which is an important challenge in the field of Automating Code Adaptation for MLOps. By providing a standardized benchmark, the authors hope to help researchers and practitioners choose the best optimization techniques for their specific machine learning problems.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes the design and implementation of the Fast Optimizer Benchmark (FOB), a new benchmark for evaluating the performance of optimization algorithms on a range of challenging problems. The benchmark includes several synthetic and real-world optimization problems, such as different types of Rosenbrock functions, the Branin function, and hyperparameter tuning for machine learning models.
The authors compare the performance of several state-of-the-art optimization algorithms, including Context Freeze-Thaw Bayesian Optimization, Revisiting Zeroth-Order Optimization, and Automating Code Adaptation for MLOps. They evaluate the algorithms based on their ability to quickly find the global optimum, as well as their sample efficiency and robustness to different problem characteristics.
The results show that the various optimization algorithms have different strengths and weaknesses, and that the choice of algorithm can have a significant impact on the performance of large-scale machine learning models. The authors provide detailed insights into the trade-offs and considerations involved in selecting the appropriate optimization strategy for a given problem.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-designed benchmark for evaluating optimization algorithms, which is a valuable contribution to the field. The authors have carefully selected a diverse set of optimization problems and have implemented the benchmark in a rigorous and reproducible manner.
However, one potential limitation of the study is that it only considers a limited set of optimization algorithms. While the authors have included several state-of-the-art techniques, there may be other promising approaches, such as CatBench: A Compiler Autotuning Benchmarking Suite, that are not included in the evaluation.
Additionally, the paper does not provide much discussion on the practical implications of the findings or how the benchmark could be used to inform real-world machine learning applications. It would be helpful to see more discussion on the challenges and considerations involved in applying these optimization algorithms in the context of large-scale, production-ready machine learning systems.
Overall, the Fast Optimizer Benchmark is a valuable contribution to the field of hyperparameter optimization, and the insights provided in the paper can help researchers and practitioners make more informed choices when selecting optimization algorithms for their machine learning projects.
Conclusion
The Fast Optimizer Benchmark presented in this paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous evaluation of state-of-the-art optimization algorithms for large-scale machine learning models. The results demonstrate the importance of carefully selecting the right optimization strategy for a given problem, as the choice can have a significant impact on the performance and efficiency of the overall system.
By providing a standardized benchmark and detailed insights into the trade-offs of different optimization approaches, the authors hope to assist researchers and practitioners in making more informed decisions when tuning the parameters of their machine learning models. This work is an important step towards improving the efficiency and scalability of large-scale machine learning systems, which is a crucial challenge in the field of Automating Code Adaptation for MLOps.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Fast Optimizer Benchmark
Simon Blauth, Tobias Burger, Zacharias Haringer, Jorg Franke, Frank Hutter
In this paper, we present the Fast Optimizer Benchmark (FOB), a tool designed for evaluating deep learning optimizers during their development. The benchmark supports tasks from multiple domains such as computer vision, natural language processing, and graph learning. The focus is on convenient usage, featuring human-readable YAML configurations, SLURM integration, and plotting utilities. FOB can be used together with existing hyperparameter optimization (HPO) tools as it handles training and resuming of runs. The modular design enables integration into custom pipelines, using it simply as a collection of tasks. We showcase an optimizer comparison as a usage example of our tool. FOB can be found on GitHub: https://github.com/automl/FOB.
Read more6/28/2024
0
FastBO: Fast HPO and NAS with Adaptive Fidelity Identification
Jiantong Jiang, Ajmal Mian
Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) and neural architecture search (NAS) are powerful in attaining state-of-the-art machine learning models, with Bayesian optimization (BO) standing out as a mainstream method. Extending BO into the multi-fidelity setting has been an emerging research topic, but faces the challenge of determining an appropriate fidelity for each hyperparameter configuration to fit the surrogate model. To tackle the challenge, we propose a multi-fidelity BO method named FastBO, which adaptively decides the fidelity for each configuration and efficiently offers strong performance. The advantages are achieved based on the novel concepts of efficient point and saturation point for each configuration.We also show that our adaptive fidelity identification strategy provides a way to extend any single-fidelity method to the multi-fidelity setting, highlighting its generality and applicability.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Fast Benchmarking of Asynchronous Multi-Fidelity Optimization on Zero-Cost Benchmarks
Shuhei Watanabe, Neeratyoy Mallik, Edward Bergman, Frank Hutter
While deep learning has celebrated many successes, its results often hinge on the meticulous selection of hyperparameters (HPs). However, the time-consuming nature of deep learning training makes HP optimization (HPO) a costly endeavor, slowing down the development of efficient HPO tools. While zero-cost benchmarks, which provide performance and runtime without actual training, offer a solution for non-parallel setups, they fall short in parallel setups as each worker must communicate its queried runtime to return its evaluation in the exact order. This work addresses this challenge by introducing a user-friendly Python package that facilitates efficient parallel HPO with zero-cost benchmarks. Our approach calculates the exact return order based on the information stored in file system, eliminating the need for long waiting times and enabling much faster HPO evaluations. We first verify the correctness of our approach through extensive testing and the experiments with 6 popular HPO libraries show its applicability to diverse libraries and its ability to achieve over 1000x speedup compared to a traditional approach. Our package can be installed via pip install mfhpo-simulator.
Read more8/20/2024
0
FOSS: A Self-Learned Doctor for Query Optimizer
Kai Zhong, Luming Sun, Tao Ji, Cuiping Li, Hong Chen
Various works have utilized deep learning to address the query optimization problem in database system. They either learn to construct plans from scratch in a bottom-up manner or steer the plan generation behavior of traditional optimizer using hints. While these methods have achieved some success, they face challenges in either low training efficiency or limited plan search space. To address these challenges, we introduce FOSS, a novel framework for query optimization based on deep reinforcement learning. FOSS initiates optimization from the original plan generated by a traditional optimizer and incrementally refines suboptimal nodes of the plan through a sequence of actions. Additionally, we devise an asymmetric advantage model to evaluate the advantage between two plans. We integrate it with a traditional optimizer to form a simulated environment. Leveraging this simulated environment, FOSS can bootstrap itself to rapidly generate a large amount of high-quality simulated experiences. FOSS then learns from these experiences to improve its optimization capability. We evaluate the performance of FOSS on Join Order Benchmark, TPC-DS, and Stack Overflow. The experimental results demonstrate that FOSS outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in terms of latency performance. Compared to PostgreSQL, FOSS achieves speedup ranging from 1.15x to 8.33x in total latency across different benchmarks.
Read more8/15/2024