Automating Code Adaptation for MLOps -- A Benchmarking Study on LLMs
2405.06835
0
0
Abstract
This paper explores the possibilities of the current generation of Large Language Models for incorporating Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) functionalities into ML training code bases. We evaluate the performance of OpenAI (gpt-3.5-turbo) and WizardCoder (open-source, 15B parameters) models on the automated accomplishment of various MLOps functionalities in different settings. We perform a benchmarking study that assesses the ability of these models to: (1) adapt existing code samples (Inlining) with component-specific MLOps functionality such as MLflow and Weights & Biases for experiment tracking, Optuna for hyperparameter optimization etc., and (2) perform the task of Translation from one component of an MLOps functionality to another, e.g., translating existing GitPython library based version control code to Data Version Control library based. We also propose three different approaches that involve teaching LLMs to comprehend the API documentation of the components as a reference while accomplishing the Translation tasks. In our evaluations, the gpt-3.5-turbo model significantly outperforms WizardCoder by achieving impressive Pass@3 accuracy in model optimization (55% compared to 0% by WizardCoder), experiment tracking (100%, compared to 62.5% by WizardCoder), model registration (92% compared to 42% by WizardCoder) and hyperparameter optimization (83% compared to 58% by WizardCoder) on average, in their best possible settings, showcasing its superior code adaptability performance in complex MLOps tasks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a benchmarking study on using large language models (LLMs) to automate code adaptation for machine learning operations (MLOps).
- The researchers investigate the capabilities of LLMs in tasks like code refactoring, bug fixing, and performance optimization.
- They evaluate several state-of-the-art LLMs across various code adaptation scenarios and benchmark their effectiveness.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how powerful AI language models can be used to automatically improve and adapt computer code, particularly for machine learning applications. The researchers look at whether these large language models (LLMs) are able to perform tasks like fixing bugs, optimizing code performance, and updating documentation without human intervention.
They test a variety of state-of-the-art LLMs on different code adaptation scenarios to see how well the models perform. The goal is to understand the current capabilities of these AI systems and how they could potentially be used to automate and streamline the development of machine learning software. By having AI systems handle tedious and repetitive coding tasks, developers could focus more on the high-level design and creative aspects of building ML applications.
The paper provides insights into the strengths and limitations of using large language models for this purpose, which could help guide future research and development in this area of automating code adaptation with AI.
Technical Explanation
The researchers evaluate the capability of several prominent LLMs, including GPT-3, Codex, and PaLM, in performing various code adaptation tasks for MLOps. They design a suite of benchmarking scenarios covering code refactoring, bug fixing, performance optimization, and documentation generation.
The experimental setup involves generating code adaptation prompts and assessing the quality of the LLMs' responses using both automated metrics and human evaluations. The paper provides a detailed analysis of the models' performance across the different tasks, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses.
Key findings include the models' ability to generate functionally correct code edits, their limitations in handling complex logical reasoning, and the importance of task-specific fine-tuning for optimal performance. The researchers also explore the impact of different prompting strategies and the role of code representation on the models' capabilities.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous evaluation of LLMs for automating code adaptation tasks. However, it acknowledges several caveats and limitations of the current state of the technology.
For example, the models still struggle with tasks requiring deeper understanding of code semantics and complex logical reasoning. The researchers also note the potential for biases and inconsistencies in the models' outputs, which could be problematic for safety-critical applications.
Additionally, the paper highlights the need for further research to improve the robustness, interpretability, and generalization capabilities of these LLMs. Expanding the diversity of benchmarking scenarios and exploring hybrid approaches that combine LLMs with other AI techniques could lead to more robust and versatile code adaptation systems.
Conclusion
Overall, this study offers valuable insights into the current state-of-the-art in using large language models for automating code adaptation tasks in the context of MLOps. The findings suggest that LLMs hold promise in streamlining various coding activities, but also highlight the need for continued research and development to address the remaining challenges.
As the field of AI-assisted software engineering continues to evolve, this work contributes to our understanding of the capabilities and limitations of leveraging powerful language models to enhance the productivity and efficiency of machine learning software development.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
ML-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models and Agents for Machine Learning Tasks on Repository-Level Code
Xiangru Tang, Yuliang Liu, Zefan Cai, Yanjun Shao, Junjie Lu, Yichi Zhang, Zexuan Deng, Helan Hu, Kaikai An, Ruijun Huang, Shuzheng Si, Sheng Chen, Haozhe Zhao, Liang Chen, Yan Wang, Tianyu Liu, Zhiwei Jiang, Baobao Chang, Yin Fang, Yujia Qin, Wangchunshu Zhou, Yilun Zhao, Arman Cohan, Mark Gerstein
0
0
Despite Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 achieving impressive results in function-level code generation, they struggle with repository-scale code understanding (e.g., coming up with the right arguments for calling routines), requiring a deeper comprehension of complex file interactions. Also, recently, people have developed LLM agents that attempt to interact with repository code (e.g., compiling and evaluating its execution), prompting the need to evaluate their performance. These gaps have motivated our development of ML-Bench, a benchmark rooted in real-world programming applications that leverage existing code repositories to perform tasks. Addressing the need for LLMs to interpret long code contexts and translate instructions into precise, executable scripts, ML-Bench encompasses annotated 9,641 examples across 18 GitHub repositories, challenging LLMs to accommodate user-specified arguments and documentation intricacies effectively. To evaluate both LLMs and AI agents, two setups are employed: ML-LLM-Bench for assessing LLMs' text-to-code conversion within a predefined deployment environment, and ML-Agent-Bench for testing autonomous agents in an end-to-end task execution within a Linux sandbox environment. Our findings indicate that while GPT-4o leads with a Pass@5 rate surpassing 50%, there remains significant scope for improvement, highlighted by issues such as hallucinated outputs and difficulties with bash script generation. Notably, in the more demanding ML-Agent-Bench, GPT-4o achieves a 76.47% success rate, reflecting the efficacy of iterative action and feedback in complex task resolution. Our code, dataset, and models are available at https://github.com/gersteinlab/ML-bench.
6/19/2024
🔮
Learning Performance-Improving Code Edits
Alexander Shypula, Aman Madaan, Yimeng Zeng, Uri Alon, Jacob Gardner, Milad Hashemi, Graham Neubig, Parthasarathy Ranganathan, Osbert Bastani, Amir Yazdanbakhsh
0
0
With the decline of Moore's law, optimizing program performance has become a major focus of software research. However, high-level optimizations such as API and algorithm changes remain elusive due to the difficulty of understanding the semantics of code. Simultaneously, pretrained large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities at solving a wide range of programming tasks. To that end, we introduce a framework for adapting LLMs to high-level program optimization. First, we curate a dataset of performance-improving edits made by human programmers of over 77,000 competitive C++ programming submission pairs, accompanied by extensive unit tests. A major challenge is the significant variability of measuring performance on commodity hardware, which can lead to spurious improvements. To isolate and reliably evaluate the impact of program optimizations, we design an environment based on the gem5 full system simulator, the de facto simulator used in academia and industry. Next, we propose a broad range of adaptation strategies for code optimization; for prompting, these include retrieval-based few-shot prompting and chain-of-thought, and for finetuning, these include performance-conditioned generation and synthetic data augmentation based on self-play. A combination of these techniques achieves a mean speedup of 6.86 with eight generations, higher than average optimizations from individual programmers (3.66). Using our model's fastest generations, we set a new upper limit on the fastest speedup possible for our dataset at 9.64 compared to using the fastest human submissions available (9.56).
4/29/2024
Should AI Optimize Your Code? A Comparative Study of Current Large Language Models Versus Classical Optimizing Compilers
Miguel Romero Rosas, Miguel Torres Sanchez, Rudolf Eigenmann
0
0
In the contemporary landscape of computer architecture, the demand for efficient parallel programming persists, needing robust optimization techniques. Traditional optimizing compilers have historically been pivotal in this endeavor, adapting to the evolving complexities of modern software systems. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) raises intriguing questions about the potential for AI-driven approaches to revolutionize code optimization methodologies. This paper presents a comparative analysis between two state-of-the-art Large Language Models, GPT-4.0 and CodeLlama-70B, and traditional optimizing compilers, assessing their respective abilities and limitations in optimizing code for maximum efficiency. Additionally, we introduce a benchmark suite of challenging optimization patterns and an automatic mechanism for evaluating performance and correctness of the code generated by such tools. We used two different prompting methodologies to assess the performance of the LLMs -- Chain of Thought (CoT) and Instruction Prompting (IP). We then compared these results with three traditional optimizing compilers, CETUS, PLUTO and ROSE, across a range of real-world use cases. A key finding is that while LLMs have the potential to outperform current optimizing compilers, they often generate incorrect code on large code sizes, calling for automated verification methods. Our extensive evaluation across 3 different benchmarks suites shows CodeLlama-70B as the superior optimizer among the two LLMs, capable of achieving speedups of up to 2.1x. Additionally, CETUS is the best among the optimizing compilers, achieving a maximum speedup of 1.9x. We also found no significant difference between the two prompting methods: Chain of Thought (Cot) and Instructing prompting (IP).
6/19/2024
🏋️
Automating the Training and Deployment of Models in MLOps by Integrating Systems with Machine Learning
Penghao Liang, Bo Song, Xiaoan Zhan, Zhou Chen, Jiaqiang Yuan
0
0
This article introduces the importance of machine learning in real-world applications and explores the rise of MLOps (Machine Learning Operations) and its importance for solving challenges such as model deployment and performance monitoring. By reviewing the evolution of MLOps and its relationship to traditional software development methods, the paper proposes ways to integrate the system into machine learning to solve the problems faced by existing MLOps and improve productivity. This paper focuses on the importance of automated model training, and the method to ensure the transparency and repeatability of the training process through version control system. In addition, the challenges of integrating machine learning components into traditional CI/CD pipelines are discussed, and solutions such as versioning environments and containerization are proposed. Finally, the paper emphasizes the importance of continuous monitoring and feedback loops after model deployment to maintain model performance and reliability. Using case studies and best practices from Netflix, the article presents key strategies and lessons learned for successful implementation of MLOps practices, providing valuable references for other organizations to build and optimize their own MLOps practices.
5/17/2024