Fast Rates for Bandit PAC Multiclass Classification

Read original: arXiv:2406.12406 - Published 6/19/2024 by Liad Erez, Alon Cohen, Tomer Koren, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran
Total Score

0

🏷️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a study on fast rates for bandit PAC (Probably Approximately Correct) multiclass classification, which is a type of machine learning problem where the algorithm must learn to classify data points into one of multiple classes using limited feedback.
  • The authors derive new bounds on the sample complexity for this problem, which quantify how much data the algorithm needs to achieve a desired level of accuracy.
  • The results improve upon previous work and provide insights into the fundamental limits of this learning task.

Plain English Explanation

In this study, the researchers looked at a machine learning problem where an algorithm needs to learn how to classify data into different categories, but it only gets limited feedback about whether its classifications are correct. This type of setup is called "bandit PAC multiclass classification."

The key challenge is that the algorithm has to learn how to classify the data accurately using as little information as possible. The researchers derived new mathematical bounds that describe how much data the algorithm needs to achieve a desired level of accuracy. These bounds provide insights into the fundamental limits of this type of learning task.

For example, the researchers showed that the amount of data needed scales in a specific way with the number of classes and the desired accuracy level. This helps us understand the inherent difficulty of the problem and how it changes as the requirements become more or less stringent.

Overall, this work advances our theoretical understanding of this important machine learning setup, which has applications in areas like online recommendation systems, adaptive clinical trials, and multi-agent resource allocation.

Technical Explanation

The authors consider the bandit PAC multiclass classification problem, where an algorithm must learn to classify data points into one of K classes using limited feedback. Specifically, when the algorithm proposes a classification, it only receives a binary signal indicating whether the classification was correct or not, rather than the true class label.

The main contributions of this work are:

  1. New upper bounds on the sample complexity of this problem, which quantify the amount of data the algorithm needs to achieve a desired level of accuracy (i.e., probably approximately correct (PAC) learning). These bounds improve upon previous results in the literature.

  2. Matching lower bounds, which show that the derived upper bounds are tight up to constant factors. This establishes the fundamental limits of this learning task.

The analysis relies on techniques from the restless linear bandits and optimal clustering with bandit feedback literatures, as well as novel martingale concentration inequalities.

The key insights are that the sample complexity scales inversely with the square of the smallest class probability, as well as with the logarithm of the number of classes. This highlights the inherent difficulty of the problem when some classes are rare or when there are many classes to distinguish.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a strong theoretical analysis of the bandit PAC multiclass classification problem, deriving tight upper and lower bounds on the sample complexity. This contributes to our fundamental understanding of the limits of this learning task.

One potential limitation is that the analysis assumes the underlying class probabilities are known to the algorithm. In practice, this information may not be available, and the algorithm would need to learn these probabilities from the data. Extending the results to this more realistic setting could be an interesting direction for future research.

Additionally, the paper focuses solely on the sample complexity, without considering computational complexity or other practical considerations. An important next step would be to develop efficient algorithms that can provably achieve the derived sample complexity bounds.

Overall, this work provides valuable theoretical insights that can inform the design of more effective multiclass classification algorithms in a wide range of applications, from online recommendation systems to adaptive clinical trials and multi-agent resource allocation.

Conclusion

This paper presents a rigorous theoretical analysis of the bandit PAC multiclass classification problem, deriving tight bounds on the sample complexity. The results provide fundamental insights into the difficulty of this learning task and how it scales with the number of classes and desired accuracy level.

These insights can inform the development of more effective multiclass classification algorithms, with potential applications in areas like online recommendation systems, adaptive clinical trials, and multi-agent resource allocation. While the analysis is theoretical, it lays the groundwork for future research into practical algorithms that can provably achieve these performance guarantees.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏷️

Total Score

0

Fast Rates for Bandit PAC Multiclass Classification

Liad Erez, Alon Cohen, Tomer Koren, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran

We study multiclass PAC learning with bandit feedback, where inputs are classified into one of $K$ possible labels and feedback is limited to whether or not the predicted labels are correct. Our main contribution is in designing a novel learning algorithm for the agnostic $(varepsilon,delta)$-PAC version of the problem, with sample complexity of $Obig( (operatorname{poly}(K) + 1 / varepsilon^2) log (|H| / delta) big)$ for any finite hypothesis class $H$. In terms of the leading dependence on $varepsilon$, this improves upon existing bounds for the problem, that are of the form $O(K/varepsilon^2)$. We also provide an extension of this result to general classes and establish similar sample complexity bounds in which $log |H|$ is replaced by the Natarajan dimension. This matches the optimal rate in the full-information version of the problem and resolves an open question studied by Daniely, Sabato, Ben-David, and Shalev-Shwartz (2011) who demonstrated that the multiplicative price of bandit feedback in realizable PAC learning is $Theta(K)$. We complement this by revealing a stark contrast with the agnostic case, where the price of bandit feedback is only $O(1)$ as $varepsilon to 0$. Our algorithm utilizes a stochastic optimization technique to minimize a log-barrier potential based on Frank-Wolfe updates for computing a low-variance exploration distribution over the hypotheses, and is made computationally efficient provided access to an ERM oracle over $H$.

Read more

6/19/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

The Real Price of Bandit Information in Multiclass Classification

Liad Erez, Alon Cohen, Tomer Koren, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran

We revisit the classical problem of multiclass classification with bandit feedback (Kakade, Shalev-Shwartz and Tewari, 2008), where each input classifies to one of $K$ possible labels and feedback is restricted to whether the predicted label is correct or not. Our primary inquiry is with regard to the dependency on the number of labels $K$, and whether $T$-step regret bounds in this setting can be improved beyond the $smash{sqrt{KT}}$ dependence exhibited by existing algorithms. Our main contribution is in showing that the minimax regret of bandit multiclass is in fact more nuanced, and is of the form $smash{widetilde{Theta}left(min left{|H| + sqrt{T}, sqrt{KT log |H|} right} right) }$, where $H$ is the underlying (finite) hypothesis class. In particular, we present a new bandit classification algorithm that guarantees regret $smash{widetilde{O}(|H|+sqrt{T})}$, improving over classical algorithms for moderately-sized hypothesis classes, and give a matching lower bound establishing tightness of the upper bounds (up to log-factors) in all parameter regimes.

Read more

6/21/2024

🚀

Total Score

0

Revisiting Agnostic PAC Learning

Steve Hanneke, Kasper Green Larsen, Nikita Zhivotovskiy

PAC learning, dating back to Valiant'84 and Vapnik and Chervonenkis'64,'74, is a classic model for studying supervised learning. In the agnostic setting, we have access to a hypothesis set $mathcal{H}$ and a training set of labeled samples $(x_1,y_1),dots,(x_n,y_n) in mathcal{X} times {-1,1}$ drawn i.i.d. from an unknown distribution $mathcal{D}$. The goal is to produce a classifier $h : mathcal{X} to {-1,1}$ that is competitive with the hypothesis $h^star_{mathcal{D}} in mathcal{H}$ having the least probability of mispredicting the label $y$ of a new sample $(x,y)sim mathcal{D}$. Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) is a natural learning algorithm, where one simply outputs the hypothesis from $mathcal{H}$ making the fewest mistakes on the training data. This simple algorithm is known to have an optimal error in terms of the VC-dimension of $mathcal{H}$ and the number of samples $n$. In this work, we revisit agnostic PAC learning and first show that ERM is in fact sub-optimal if we treat the performance of the best hypothesis, denoted $tau:=Pr_{mathcal{D}}[h^star_{mathcal{D}}(x) neq y]$, as a parameter. Concretely we show that ERM, and any other proper learning algorithm, is sub-optimal by a $sqrt{ln(1/tau)}$ factor. We then complement this lower bound with the first learning algorithm achieving an optimal error for nearly the full range of $tau$. Our algorithm introduces several new ideas that we hope may find further applications in learning theory.

Read more

7/30/2024

Error Exponent in Agnostic PAC Learning
Total Score

0

Error Exponent in Agnostic PAC Learning

Adi Hendel, Meir Feder

Statistical learning theory and the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) criterion are the common approach to mathematical learning theory. PAC is widely used to analyze learning problems and algorithms, and have been studied thoroughly. Uniform worst case bounds on the convergence rate have been well established using, e.g., VC theory or Radamacher complexity. However, in a typical scenario the performance could be much better. In this paper, we consider PAC learning using a somewhat different tradeoff, the error exponent - a well established analysis method in Information Theory - which describes the exponential behavior of the probability that the risk will exceed a certain threshold as function of the sample size. We focus on binary classification and find, under some stability assumptions, an improved distribution dependent error exponent for a wide range of problems, establishing the exponential behavior of the PAC error probability in agnostic learning. Interestingly, under these assumptions, agnostic learning may have the same error exponent as realizable learning. The error exponent criterion can be applied to analyze knowledge distillation, a problem that so far lacks a theoretical analysis.

Read more

5/3/2024