FedLAP-DP: Federated Learning by Sharing Differentially Private Loss Approximations

Read original: arXiv:2302.01068 - Published 5/6/2024 by Hui-Po Wang, Dingfan Chen, Raouf Kerkouche, Mario Fritz
Total Score

0

⚙️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Conventional federated learning (FL) approaches like FedAvg face performance issues under differential privacy (DP) mechanisms or data heterogeneity.
  • This is due to the inconsistency between the local and global objectives.
  • The paper proposes FedLAP-DP, a novel privacy-preserving approach for FL that aims to address these challenges.

Plain English Explanation

Federated learning is a technique that allows multiple devices or organizations to collaborate on training a machine learning model without sharing their raw data. This is useful for preserving privacy and security. However, standard federated learning methods like FedAvg can run into problems when the data on each device is very different (heterogeneous) or when additional privacy protections are added.

The key idea behind the FedLAP-DP approach is to have each device synthesize a small set of "fake" data samples that approximates the shape of the device's loss function (how well the model is performing). These synthetic samples are then sent to a central server, which can use them to get a better understanding of the overall loss landscape and optimize the model more effectively.

This approach offers several benefits:

  1. It can maintain high model performance even when differential privacy is applied to protect user data. Differential privacy is a way to add noise to data to prevent individual records from being identified.
  2. It can work well even when the data on different devices is very different in distribution. Prior work has shown this can be a challenge for standard federated learning.
  3. It can converge to a good model faster than traditional gradient-sharing methods like FedAvg.
  4. It may be possible to further improve performance by sending more synthetic samples, trading off increased communication costs.

Technical Explanation

The FedLAP-DP approach works as follows:

  1. Each client device synthesizes a small set of "loss surrogate" samples that approximate the shape of the device's local loss landscape. This is done by simulating gradients of real images within a local region.
  2. These synthetic samples are then sent to the central server.
  3. The server aggregates the loss surrogates from all clients to uncover the global loss landscape.
  4. The server can then use this global loss information to optimize the shared model parameters, enabling better performance compared to standard gradient-sharing approaches.

The authors provide a formal privacy analysis demonstrating that FedLAP-DP incurs the same privacy costs as typical gradient-sharing schemes while achieving improved privacy-utility tradeoffs.

Extensive experiments on various datasets with skewed distributions show the superiority of FedLAP-DP in both differential privacy and non-differential privacy settings. The approach also exhibits faster convergence compared to standard gradient-sharing methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to address the challenges of federated learning under data heterogeneity and differential privacy. The key idea of using synthetic loss surrogate samples is clever and appears to offer tangible benefits.

However, the paper does not discuss the potential computational and storage overhead of generating and transmitting these synthetic samples on resource-constrained client devices. There may be a tradeoff between the performance gains and the increased communication and processing requirements.

Additionally, the authors do not address how FedLAP-DP would handle dynamic changes in the data distribution over time. As client data evolves, the synthetic samples may need to be updated regularly to maintain their relevance.

Further research could also explore the robustness of FedLAP-DP to adversarial attacks, as the use of synthetic data may introduce new vulnerabilities. Prior work has shown that differential privacy techniques can sometimes be susceptible to such attacks in federated learning settings.

Conclusion

The FedLAP-DP approach presented in this paper offers a promising solution to the performance challenges of federated learning under differential privacy and data heterogeneity. By having clients generate synthetic loss surrogate samples, the method can uncover the global loss landscape more effectively than standard gradient-sharing techniques.

The demonstrated improvements in model performance and convergence speed are significant and could have important implications for the real-world deployment of federated learning systems, particularly in sensitive domains where both privacy and utility are crucial. Further research to address the potential limitations and expand the applicability of this approach could make valuable contributions to the field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

⚙️

Total Score

0

FedLAP-DP: Federated Learning by Sharing Differentially Private Loss Approximations

Hui-Po Wang, Dingfan Chen, Raouf Kerkouche, Mario Fritz

Conventional gradient-sharing approaches for federated learning (FL), such as FedAvg, rely on aggregation of local models and often face performance degradation under differential privacy (DP) mechanisms or data heterogeneity, which can be attributed to the inconsistency between the local and global objectives. To address this issue, we propose FedLAP-DP, a novel privacy-preserving approach for FL. Our formulation involves clients synthesizing a small set of samples that approximate local loss landscapes by simulating the gradients of real images within a local region. Acting as loss surrogates, these synthetic samples are aggregated on the server side to uncover the global loss landscape and enable global optimization. Building upon these insights, we offer a new perspective to enforce record-level differential privacy in FL. A formal privacy analysis demonstrates that FedLAP-DP incurs the same privacy costs as typical gradient-sharing schemes while achieving an improved trade-off between privacy and utility. Extensive experiments validate the superiority of our approach across various datasets with highly skewed distributions in both DP and non-DP settings. Beyond the promising performance, our approach presents a faster convergence speed compared to typical gradient-sharing methods and opens up the possibility of trading communication costs for better performance by sending a larger set of synthetic images. The source is available at https://github.com/a514514772/FedLAP-DP.

Read more

5/6/2024

Enhancing Federated Learning with Adaptive Differential Privacy and Priority-Based Aggregation
Total Score

0

Enhancing Federated Learning with Adaptive Differential Privacy and Priority-Based Aggregation

Mahtab Talaei, Iman Izadi

Federated learning (FL), a novel branch of distributed machine learning (ML), develops global models through a private procedure without direct access to local datasets. However, it is still possible to access the model updates (gradient updates of deep neural networks) transferred between clients and servers, potentially revealing sensitive local information to adversaries using model inversion attacks. Differential privacy (DP) offers a promising approach to addressing this issue by adding noise to the parameters. On the other hand, heterogeneities in data structure, storage, communication, and computational capabilities of devices can cause convergence problems and delays in developing the global model. A personalized weighted averaging of local parameters based on the resources of each device can yield a better aggregated model in each round. In this paper, to efficiently preserve privacy, we propose a personalized DP framework that injects noise based on clients' relative impact factors and aggregates parameters while considering heterogeneities and adjusting properties. To fulfill the DP requirements, we first analyze the convergence boundary of the FL algorithm when impact factors are personalized and fixed throughout the learning process. We then further study the convergence property considering time-varying (adaptive) impact factors.

Read more

6/27/2024

Convergent Differential Privacy Analysis for General Federated Learning: the f-DP Perspective
Total Score

0

Convergent Differential Privacy Analysis for General Federated Learning: the f-DP Perspective

Yan Sun, Li Shen, Dacheng Tao

Federated learning (FL) is an efficient collaborative training paradigm extensively developed with a focus on local privacy protection, and differential privacy (DP) is a classical approach to capture and ensure the reliability of local privacy. The powerful cooperation of FL and DP provides a promising learning framework for large-scale private clients, juggling both privacy securing and trustworthy learning. As the predominant algorithm of DP, the noisy perturbation has been widely studied and incorporated into various federated algorithms, theoretically proven to offer significant privacy protections. However, existing analyses in noisy FL-DP mostly rely on the composition theorem and cannot tightly quantify the privacy leakage challenges, which is nearly tight for small numbers of communication rounds but yields an arbitrarily loose and divergent bound under the large communication rounds. This implies a counterintuitive judgment, suggesting that FL may not provide adequate privacy protection during long-term training. To further investigate the convergent privacy and reliability of the FL-DP framework, in this paper, we comprehensively evaluate the worst privacy of two classical methods under the non-convex and smooth objectives based on the f-DP analysis, i.e. Noisy-FedAvg and Noisy-FedProx methods. With the aid of the shifted-interpolation technique, we successfully prove that the worst privacy of the Noisy-FedAvg method achieves a tight convergent lower bound. Moreover, in the Noisy-FedProx method, with the regularization of the proxy term, the worst privacy has a stable constant lower bound. Our analysis further provides a solid theoretical foundation for the reliability of privacy protection in FL-DP. Meanwhile, our conclusions can also be losslessly converted to other classical DP analytical frameworks, e.g. $(epsilon,delta)$-DP and R$acute{text{e}}$nyi-DP (RDP).

Read more

8/29/2024

Mitigating Disparate Impact of Differential Privacy in Federated Learning through Robust Clustering
Total Score

0

Mitigating Disparate Impact of Differential Privacy in Federated Learning through Robust Clustering

Saber Malekmohammadi, Afaf Taik, Golnoosh Farnadi

Federated Learning (FL) is a decentralized machine learning (ML) approach that keeps data localized and often incorporates Differential Privacy (DP) to enhance privacy guarantees. Similar to previous work on DP in ML, we observed that differentially private federated learning (DPFL) introduces performance disparities, particularly affecting minority groups. Recent work has attempted to address performance fairness in vanilla FL through clustering, but this method remains sensitive and prone to errors, which are further exacerbated by the DP noise in DPFL. To fill this gap, in this paper, we propose a novel clustered DPFL algorithm designed to effectively identify clients' clusters in highly heterogeneous settings while maintaining high accuracy with DP guarantees. To this end, we propose to cluster clients based on both their model updates and training loss values. Our proposed approach also addresses the server's uncertainties in clustering clients' model updates by employing larger batch sizes along with Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to alleviate the impact of noise and potential clustering errors, especially in privacy-sensitive scenarios. We provide theoretical analysis of the effectiveness of our proposed approach. We also extensively evaluate our approach across diverse data distributions and privacy budgets and show its effectiveness in mitigating the disparate impact of DP in FL settings with a small computational cost.

Read more

5/30/2024