On Finding Bi-objective Pareto-optimal Fraud Prevention Rule Sets for Fintech Applications

Read original: arXiv:2311.00964 - Published 7/1/2024 by Chengyao Wen, Yin Lou
Total Score

0

📶

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper focuses on improving the flexibility and effectiveness of a two-stage framework for fraud prevention decision rule set mining used in large Fintech institutions.
  • The key ideas include:
    • Introducing a novel algorithm called SpectralRules to generate a compact pool of diverse rules in the first stage.
    • Incorporating an intermediate stage that adopts the concept of Pareto optimality to find a set of non-dominated rule subsets.
    • Proposing a heuristic-based framework called PORS to handle the problem of solution selection on the Pareto front.

Plain English Explanation

Fintech companies often use a set of rules to detect and prevent fraud. These rules are written in a simple if-then format, making them easy to understand and interpret. The process of generating these fraud prevention rules typically involves two stages:

  1. Stage 1: Generating a large pool of potential rules.
  2. Stage 2: Refining this rule set to find a smaller, high-quality subset based on criteria like precision and recall.

This paper aims to improve this two-stage framework by:

  1. Introducing a new algorithm called SpectralRules that generates a more diverse pool of rules in the first stage. This diversity is found to improve the quality of the final rule subset.
  2. Adding an intermediate stage between Stage 1 and 2 that uses the concept of Pareto optimality to find a set of non-dominated rule subsets (the Pareto front). This simplifies the selection criteria and increases the flexibility of Stage 2.
  3. Proposing a heuristic-based framework called PORS to handle the problem of solution selection on the Pareto front.

The authors demonstrate the advantages of their proposed methodology over existing approaches on two real-world fraud detection scenarios within Alipay, a leading Fintech company.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a two-stage framework for fraud prevention decision rule set mining in Fintech institutions. In the first stage, the authors propose a novel algorithm called SpectralRules that generates a compact pool of diverse rules. This diversity is found to improve the quality of the final rule subset.

The paper then introduces an intermediate stage between Stage 1 and 2 that adopts the concept of Pareto optimality. This stage aims to find a set of non-dominated rule subsets, which constitute a Pareto front. This intermediate stage greatly simplifies the selection criteria and increases the flexibility of Stage 2.

For this intermediate stage, the authors propose a heuristic-based framework called PORS (Pareto Optimal Rule Subset). The core of PORS is the problem of solution selection on the Pareto front (SSF). The paper provides a systematic categorization of the SSF problem and a thorough empirical evaluation of various SSF methods on both public and proprietary datasets.

The authors demonstrate the advantages of their proposed methodology over existing work on two real-world fraud detection scenarios within Alipay, a leading Fintech company.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and flexible two-stage framework for fraud prevention rule set mining that addresses some of the limitations of existing approaches. The introduction of the intermediate Pareto optimality stage is particularly interesting, as it allows for a more nuanced exploration of the trade-offs between different rule set quality metrics (e.g., precision and recall).

However, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity or scalability of the proposed algorithms, which could be a concern for real-world Fintech applications with large datasets and rule sets. Additionally, the paper does not address potential issues around fairness and bias in the rule generation and selection process, which could be an important consideration for Fintech institutions.

Further research could explore ways to improve the efficiency and scalability of the proposed framework, as well as investigate strategies for ensuring the fairness and ethical use of the generated fraud prevention rules.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel two-stage framework for fraud prevention decision rule set mining in Fintech institutions. The key contributions include:

  1. The introduction of the SpectralRules algorithm to generate a diverse pool of rules in the first stage.
  2. The incorporation of an intermediate Pareto optimality stage to find a set of high-quality, non-dominated rule subsets.
  3. The proposal of the PORS heuristic-based framework to handle the solution selection problem on the Pareto front.

The authors demonstrate the advantages of their approach over existing methods on real-world fraud detection scenarios within Alipay. This research has the potential to enhance the flexibility, effectiveness, and interpretability of fraud prevention systems in Fintech, ultimately benefiting both institutions and their customers.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📶

Total Score

0

On Finding Bi-objective Pareto-optimal Fraud Prevention Rule Sets for Fintech Applications

Chengyao Wen, Yin Lou

Rules are widely used in Fintech institutions to make fraud prevention decisions, since rules are highly interpretable thanks to their intuitive if-then structure. In practice, a two-stage framework of fraud prevention decision rule set mining is usually employed in large Fintech institutions; Stage 1 generates a potentially large pool of rules and Stage 2 aims to produce a refined rule subset according to some criteria (typically based on precision and recall). This paper focuses on improving the flexibility and efficacy of this two-stage framework, and is concerned with finding high-quality rule subsets in a bi-objective space (such as precision and recall). To this end, we first introduce a novel algorithm called SpectralRules that directly generates a compact pool of rules in Stage 1 with high diversity. We empirically find such diversity improves the quality of the final rule subset. In addition, we introduce an intermediate stage between Stage 1 and 2 that adopts the concept of Pareto optimality and aims to find a set of non-dominated rule subsets, which constitutes a Pareto front. This intermediate stage greatly simplifies the selection criteria and increases the flexibility of Stage 2. For this intermediate stage, we propose a heuristic-based framework called PORS and we identify that the core of PORS is the problem of solution selection on the front (SSF). We provide a systematic categorization of the SSF problem and a thorough empirical evaluation of various SSF methods on both public and proprietary datasets. On two real application scenarios within Alipay, we demonstrate the advantages of our proposed methodology over existing work.

Read more

7/1/2024

RIFF: Inducing Rules for Fraud Detection from Decision Trees
Total Score

0

RIFF: Inducing Rules for Fraud Detection from Decision Trees

Jo~ao Lucas Martins, Jo~ao Bravo, Ana Sofia Gomes, Carlos Soares, Pedro Bizarro

Financial fraud is the cause of multi-billion dollar losses annually. Traditionally, fraud detection systems rely on rules due to their transparency and interpretability, key features in domains where decisions need to be explained. However, rule systems require significant input from domain experts to create and tune, an issue that rule induction algorithms attempt to mitigate by inferring rules directly from data. We explore the application of these algorithms to fraud detection, where rule systems are constrained to have a low false positive rate (FPR) or alert rate, by proposing RIFF, a rule induction algorithm that distills a low FPR rule set directly from decision trees. Our experiments show that the induced rules are often able to maintain or improve performance of the original models for low FPR tasks, while substantially reducing their complexity and outperforming rules hand-tuned by experts.

Read more

8/26/2024

🛸

Total Score

0

Rule Generation for Classification: Scalability, Interpretability, and Fairness

Tabea E. Rober, Adia C. Lumadjeng, M. Hakan Akyuz, c{S}. .Ilker Birbil

We introduce a new rule-based optimization method for classification with constraints. The proposed method leverages column generation for linear programming, and hence, is scalable to large datasets. The resulting pricing subproblem is shown to be NP-Hard. We recourse to a decision tree-based heuristic and solve a proxy pricing subproblem for acceleration. The method returns a set of rules along with their optimal weights indicating the importance of each rule for learning. We address interpretability and fairness by assigning cost coefficients to the rules and introducing additional constraints. In particular, we focus on local interpretability and generalize separation criterion in fairness to multiple sensitive attributes and classes. We test the performance of the proposed methodology on a collection of datasets and present a case study to elaborate on its different aspects. The proposed rule-based learning method exhibits a good compromise between local interpretability and fairness on the one side, and accuracy on the other side.

Read more

5/14/2024

FAIR: Filtering of Automatically Induced Rules
Total Score

0

FAIR: Filtering of Automatically Induced Rules

Divya Jyoti Bajpai, Ayush Maheshwari, Manjesh Kumar Hanawal, Ganesh Ramakrishnan

The availability of large annotated data can be a critical bottleneck in training machine learning algorithms successfully, especially when applied to diverse domains. Weak supervision offers a promising alternative by accelerating the creation of labeled training data using domain-specific rules. However, it requires users to write a diverse set of high-quality rules to assign labels to the unlabeled data. Automatic Rule Induction (ARI) approaches circumvent this problem by automatically creating rules from features on a small labeled set and filtering a final set of rules from them. In the ARI approach, the crucial step is to filter out a set of a high-quality useful subset of rules from the large set of automatically created rules. In this paper, we propose an algorithm (Filtering of Automatically Induced Rules) to filter rules from a large number of automatically induced rules using submodular objective functions that account for the collective precision, coverage, and conflicts of the rule set. We experiment with three ARI approaches and five text classification datasets to validate the superior performance of our algorithm with respect to several semi-supervised label aggregation approaches. Further, we show that achieves statistically significant results in comparison to existing rule-filtering approaches.

Read more

7/8/2024