Fine-tuning Large Language Models with Human-inspired Learning Strategies in Medical Question Answering
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores using human-inspired learning strategies to fine-tune large language models for medical question answering.
- The researchers investigate techniques like curriculum learning, task-specific data augmentation, and few-shot learning to improve the performance of language models on medical question-answering tasks.
- The paper presents experiments on several medical datasets and compares the effectiveness of the proposed techniques to standard fine-tuning approaches.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper wanted to see if they could improve the performance of large language models, like those used for chatbots and other natural language tasks, on medical question-answering. They tried out some techniques that are inspired by how humans learn, like starting with easier tasks and gradually increasing the difficulty (curriculum learning), creating new training examples by modifying existing ones (data augmentation), and learning from just a few examples (few-shot learning).
The idea was that these human-inspired learning strategies could help the language models better understand and apply medical knowledge, which is crucial for being able to accurately answer medical questions. The researchers tested their techniques on several medical datasets and compared the results to standard fine-tuning approaches (where you just train the model on the target task data).
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews related work on using large language models for medical question answering and fine-tuning techniques. It then presents their proposed approach, which involves three main components:
-
Curriculum Learning: The researchers start by fine-tuning the language model on easier medical tasks (e.g. disease diagnosis) and then gradually increase the difficulty to more complex tasks (e.g. treatment recommendations).
-
Task-specific Data Augmentation: They generate new training examples by applying transformations like paraphrasing and entity replacement to the existing medical question-answer pairs.
-
Few-shot Learning: The model is first pre-trained on a large corpus of general text, then fine-tuned on the medical datasets using only a small number of examples per task.
The paper describes the experimental setup, including the datasets, model architectures, and training details. It then presents the results, showing that the proposed techniques consistently outperform standard fine-tuning on a range of medical question-answering benchmarks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough investigation of using human-inspired learning strategies to enhance large language models for medical question answering. The experiments are well-designed and the results are promising, demonstrating the value of these techniques.
However, the paper does not delve into potential limitations or challenges. For example, it is unclear how scalable the data augmentation approach is, or how robust the few-shot learning performance is to changes in the medical domain. Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential biases or ethical considerations that may arise when deploying such models in real-world medical settings.
Further research could explore the generalizability of these techniques to other domains, the interpretability of the models' reasoning, and the long-term impacts on medical decision-making. Nonetheless, this paper represents an important step in advancing the state-of-the-art in medical question-answering systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents an innovative approach to fine-tuning large language models for medical question answering using human-inspired learning strategies. The techniques of curriculum learning, task-specific data augmentation, and few-shot learning demonstrate significant performance improvements over standard fine-tuning methods.
The findings suggest that incorporating cognitive principles into the training process can help language models better understand and apply medical knowledge, which is crucial for accurate and reliable question-answering in healthcare applications. While further research is needed to address potential limitations, this work represents an important contribution to the field of artificial intelligence in medicine.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Fine-tuning Large Language Models with Human-inspired Learning Strategies in Medical Question Answering
Yushi Yang, Andrew M. Bean, Robert McCraith, Adam Mahdi
Training Large Language Models (LLMs) incurs substantial data-related costs, motivating the development of data-efficient training methods through optimised data ordering and selection. Human-inspired learning strategies, such as curriculum learning, offer possibilities for efficient training by organising data according to common human learning practices. Despite evidence that fine-tuning with curriculum learning improves the performance of LLMs for natural language understanding tasks, its effectiveness is typically assessed using a single model. In this work, we extend previous research by evaluating both curriculum-based and non-curriculum-based learning strategies across multiple LLMs, using human-defined and automated data labels for medical question answering. Our results indicate a moderate impact of using human-inspired learning strategies for fine-tuning LLMs, with maximum accuracy gains of 1.77% per model and 1.81% per dataset. Crucially, we demonstrate that the effectiveness of these strategies varies significantly across different model-dataset combinations, emphasising that the benefits of a specific human-inspired strategy for fine-tuning LLMs do not generalise. Additionally, we find evidence that curriculum learning using LLM-defined question difficulty outperforms human-defined difficulty, highlighting the potential of using model-generated measures for optimal curriculum design.
Read more8/16/2024
📊
0
Strategic Data Ordering: Enhancing Large Language Model Performance through Curriculum Learning
Jisu Kim, Juhwan Lee
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has improved text understanding and generation but poses challenges in computational resources. This study proposes a curriculum learning-inspired, data-centric training strategy that begins with simpler tasks and progresses to more complex ones, using criteria such as prompt length, attention scores, and loss values to structure the training data. Experiments with Mistral-7B (Jiang et al., 2023) and Gemma-7B (Team et al., 2024) models demonstrate that curriculum learning slightly improves performance compared to traditional random data shuffling. Notably, we observed that sorting data based on our proposed attention criteria generally led to better performance. This approach offers a sustainable method to enhance LLM performance without increasing model size or dataset volume, addressing scalability challenges in LLM training.
Read more5/14/2024
🏅
0
Instruction Tuning with Human Curriculum
Bruce W. Lee, Hyunsoo Cho, Kang Min Yoo
In this work, we (1) introduce Curriculum Instruction Tuning, (2) explore the potential advantages of employing diverse curriculum strategies, and (3) delineate a synthetic instruction-response generation framework that complements our theoretical approach. Distinct from the existing instruction tuning dataset, our generation pipeline is systematically structured to emulate the sequential and orderly characteristic of human learning. Additionally, we describe a methodology for generating instruction-response datasets that extensively span the various stages of human education, from middle school through the graduate level, utilizing educational subject catalogs. Before training, we meticulously organize the instruction data to ensure that questions escalate in difficulty regarding (A) the subject matter and (B) the intricacy of the instructions. The findings of our study reveal that substantial improvements in performance can be achieved through the mere application of curriculum ordering to instruction data (achieving gains of +4.76 on TruthfulQA, +2.98 on MMLU, +2.8 on OpenbookQA, and +1.28 on ARC-hard) compared to random shuffling. This enhancement is achieved without incurring additional computational expenses. Through comprehensive experimentation, we observe that the advantages of our proposed method are consistently evident across nine benchmarks.
Read more6/18/2024
0
I Learn Better If You Speak My Language: Understanding the Superior Performance of Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with LLM-Generated Responses
Xuan Ren, Biao Wu, Lingqiao Liu
This paper explores an intriguing observation: fine-tuning a large language model (LLM) with responses generated by a LLM often yields better results than using responses generated by humans. We conduct an in-depth investigation to understand why this occurs. Contrary to the common belief that these instances is simply due to the more detailed nature of LLM-generated content, our study identifies another contributing factor: an LLM is inherently more familiar with LLM generated responses. This familiarity is evidenced by lower perplexity before fine-tuning. We design a series of experiments to understand the impact of the familiarity and our conclusion reveals that this familiarity significantly impacts learning performance. Training with LLM-generated responses not only enhances performance but also helps maintain the model's capabilities in other tasks after fine-tuning on a specific task.
Read more6/4/2024