Fine-tuning Smaller Language Models for Question Answering over Financial Documents
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines fine-tuning smaller language models for question answering over financial documents
- Explores strategies to improve performance on this task with limited training data
- Proposes and evaluates several approaches, including transfer learning and prompt-based fine-tuning
Plain English Explanation
This research paper explores techniques for training smaller language models to answer questions about financial documents. Language models are AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text, but they are often very large and resource-intensive. The researchers wanted to see if they could get good performance on a financial question-answering task using more compact models.
The key idea is to fine-tune these smaller models on financial data, rather than training them from scratch. This "transfer learning" approach allows the model to leverage general language understanding while specializing in the financial domain. The researchers also explored prompt-based fine-tuning, where the model is given guidance about the task through carefully designed input prompts.
Technical Explanation
The researchers evaluated several fine-tuning approaches on a financial question-answering dataset:
- Transfer Learning: They started with a pre-trained language model (like BERT or RoBERTa) and fine-tuned it on the financial dataset.
- Prompt-based Fine-tuning: In addition to fine-tuning, they experimented with providing the model with task-specific prompts to guide its reasoning.
- Iterative Fine-tuning: They fine-tuned the model iteratively, gradually increasing the complexity of the task.
The results showed that the transfer learning approach, combined with prompt-based fine-tuning, achieved the best performance on the financial question-answering task. Iterative fine-tuning also helped, but to a lesser extent.
The researchers also analyzed the types of questions the models performed best on, finding that they excelled at factual questions but struggled more with questions requiring complex reasoning or external knowledge.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough exploration of fine-tuning strategies for financial question-answering, but there are a few limitations and areas for further research:
- The dataset used is relatively small, so it's unclear how well the findings would scale to larger financial corpora. Evaluating on additional datasets would be valuable.
- The paper focuses on compact language models, but it doesn't investigate the tradeoffs between model size, training time, and performance. Exploring this could help guide practical deployment decisions.
- The analysis of question types suggests there is room for improvement in the models' reasoning capabilities. Incorporating external knowledge or iterative refinement techniques may help address this.
Overall, the paper presents a solid approach to fine-tuning smaller language models for financial question-answering, but further research is needed to fully unlock the potential of this technology.
Conclusion
This research paper explores techniques for fine-tuning smaller language models to excel at answering questions about financial documents. The key findings are that transfer learning and prompt-based fine-tuning can be effective strategies, allowing these more compact models to achieve strong performance on this specialized task. While there are some limitations, the paper provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to make language models more efficient and capable across a variety of domains, including finance.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Fine-tuning Smaller Language Models for Question Answering over Financial Documents
Karmvir Singh Phogat, Sai Akhil Puranam, Sridhar Dasaratha, Chetan Harsha, Shashishekar Ramakrishna
Recent research has shown that smaller language models can acquire substantial reasoning abilities when fine-tuned with reasoning exemplars crafted by a significantly larger teacher model. We explore this paradigm for the financial domain, focusing on the challenge of answering questions that require multi-hop numerical reasoning over financial texts. We assess the performance of several smaller models that have been fine-tuned to generate programs that encode the required financial reasoning and calculations. Our findings demonstrate that these fine-tuned smaller models approach the performance of the teacher model. To provide a granular analysis of model performance, we propose an approach to investigate the specific student model capabilities that are enhanced by fine-tuning. Our empirical analysis indicates that fine-tuning refines the student models ability to express and apply the required financial concepts along with adapting the entity extraction for the specific data format. In addition, we hypothesize and demonstrate that comparable financial reasoning capability can be induced using relatively smaller datasets.
Read more8/23/2024
0
Enhancing Q&A with Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning and Iterative Reasoning: A Comparative Study
Zooey Nguyen, Anthony Annunziata, Vinh Luong, Sang Dinh, Quynh Le, Anh Hai Ha, Chanh Le, Hong An Phan, Shruti Raghavan, Christopher Nguyen
This paper investigates the impact of domain-specific model fine-tuning and of reasoning mechanisms on the performance of question-answering (Q&A) systems powered by large language models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Using the FinanceBench SEC financial filings dataset, we observe that, for RAG, combining a fine-tuned embedding model with a fine-tuned LLM achieves better accuracy than generic models, with relatively greater gains attributable to fine-tuned embedding models. Additionally, employing reasoning iterations on top of RAG delivers an even bigger jump in performance, enabling the Q&A systems to get closer to human-expert quality. We discuss the implications of such findings, propose a structured technical design space capturing major technical components of Q&A AI, and provide recommendations for making high-impact technical choices for such components. We plan to follow up on this work with actionable guides for AI teams and further investigations into the impact of domain-specific augmentation in RAG and into agentic AI capabilities such as advanced planning and reasoning.
Read more4/23/2024
0
Fine-Tuning or Fine-Failing? Debunking Performance Myths in Large Language Models
Scott Barnett, Zac Brannelly, Stefanus Kurniawan, Sheng Wong
Large Language Models (LLMs) have the unique capability to understand and generate human-like text from input queries. When fine-tuned, these models show enhanced performance on domain-specific queries. OpenAI highlights the process of fine-tuning, stating: To fine-tune a model, you are required to provide at least 10 examples. We typically see clear improvements from fine-tuning on 50 to 100 training examples, but the right number varies greatly based on the exact use case. This study extends this concept to the integration of LLMs within Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines, which aim to improve accuracy and relevance by leveraging external corpus data for information retrieval. However, RAG's promise of delivering optimal responses often falls short in complex query scenarios. This study aims to specifically examine the effects of fine-tuning LLMs on their ability to extract and integrate contextual data to enhance the performance of RAG systems across multiple domains. We evaluate the impact of fine-tuning on the LLMs' capacity for data extraction and contextual understanding by comparing the accuracy and completeness of fine-tuned models against baseline performances across datasets from multiple domains. Our findings indicate that fine-tuning resulted in a decline in performance compared to the baseline models, contrary to the improvements observed in standalone LLM applications as suggested by OpenAI. This study highlights the need for vigorous investigation and validation of fine-tuned models for domain-specific tasks.
Read more7/2/2024
💬
0
Optimizing Language Model's Reasoning Abilities with Weak Supervision
Yongqi Tong, Sizhe Wang, Dawei Li, Yifan Wang, Simeng Han, Zi Lin, Chengsong Huang, Jiaxin Huang, Jingbo Shang
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated proficiency in handling complex queries, much of the past work has depended on extensively annotated datasets by human experts. However, this reliance on fully-supervised annotations poses scalability challenges, particularly as models and data requirements grow. To mitigate this, we explore the potential of enhancing LLMs' reasoning abilities with minimal human supervision. In this work, we introduce self-reinforcement, which begins with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) of the model using a small collection of annotated questions. Then it iteratively improves LLMs by learning from the differences in responses from the SFT and unfinetuned models on unlabeled questions. Our approach provides an efficient approach without relying heavily on extensive human-annotated explanations. However, current reasoning benchmarks typically only include golden-reference answers or rationales. Therefore, we present textsc{PuzzleBen}, a weakly supervised benchmark that comprises 25,147 complex questions, answers, and human-generated rationales across various domains, such as brainteasers, puzzles, riddles, parajumbles, and critical reasoning tasks. A unique aspect of our dataset is the inclusion of 10,000 unannotated questions, enabling us to explore utilizing fewer supersized data to boost LLMs' inference capabilities. Our experiments underscore the significance of textsc{PuzzleBen}, as well as the effectiveness of our methodology as a promising direction in future endeavors. Our dataset and code will be published soon on texttt{Anonymity Link}.
Read more5/8/2024