FiP: a Fixed-Point Approach for Causal Generative Modeling
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Presents a fixed-point approach for causal generative modeling, called FiP (Fixed-Point)
- Aims to learn causal models from observational data, without making strong assumptions about the data-generating process
- Formulates structural causal models (SCMs) as fixed-point equations, enabling efficient inference of causal relationships
Plain English Explanation
This paper introduces a new method called FiP (Fixed-Point) for learning causal models from observational data. Causal models are important because they can help us understand how different factors influence each other, which is crucial for making informed decisions.
Traditional methods for learning causal models often require strong assumptions about the data-generating process, which may not always be realistic. FiP takes a different approach by formulating the causal model as a fixed-point equation, which can be solved efficiently. This allows the method to learn causal relationships without making overly restrictive assumptions about the data.
The key idea behind FiP is to represent the causal model as a set of equations that describe how the variables in the system influence each other. These equations are then solved iteratively to find the fixed points, which correspond to the causal relationships in the data. This approach is more flexible than traditional methods, as it can handle a wider range of data-generating processes.
Technical Explanation
The paper formulates structural causal models (SCMs) as a system of fixed-point equations, which enables efficient inference of causal relationships from observational data. This fixed-point formulation allows the method to learn causal models without making strong assumptions about the data-generating process, as is often required in traditional causal modeling approaches.
The authors show that under mild conditions, the fixed-point equations have a unique solution, which corresponds to the causal model. They then propose an efficient algorithm for solving these equations and learning the causal model from data. The algorithm iteratively updates the model parameters to converge to the fixed point, which represents the causal relationships in the data.
The paper also demonstrates the effectiveness of the FiP method on several benchmark datasets, where it outperforms existing causal discovery algorithms in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. The authors also discuss the connections between FiP and other causal modeling frameworks, such as causal representation learning and variational flow models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for causal generative modeling, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The theoretical analysis assumes certain conditions, such as the existence of a unique fixed point, which may not always hold in practice. It would be interesting to investigate the robustness of the method to violations of these assumptions.
-
The paper focuses on observational data, but in many real-world scenarios, interventional data may also be available. Extending the FiP method to incorporate interventional data could further improve the accuracy of causal discovery.
-
The paper does not provide a detailed comparison to dynamic conditional optimal transport and other recent causal modeling techniques. A more comprehensive empirical evaluation would help better understand the strengths and limitations of the FiP approach.
-
The paper does not discuss the scalability of the FiP method to high-dimensional or complex causal models. Investigating the method's performance on larger-scale problems would be an important direction for future research.
Conclusion
The FiP approach presented in this paper offers a novel and flexible framework for causal generative modeling. By formulating structural causal models as fixed-point equations, the method can learn causal relationships from observational data without making strong assumptions about the data-generating process. The promising results on benchmark datasets suggest that the FiP approach has the potential to become a valuable tool for causal discovery in a wide range of applications, from probabilistic generating circuits to causal reasoning in AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
FiP: a Fixed-Point Approach for Causal Generative Modeling
Meyer Scetbon, Joel Jennings, Agrin Hilmkil, Cheng Zhang, Chao Ma
Modeling true world data-generating processes lies at the heart of empirical science. Structural Causal Models (SCMs) and their associated Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) provide an increasingly popular answer to such problems by defining the causal generative process that transforms random noise into observations. However, learning them from observational data poses an ill-posed and NP-hard inverse problem in general. In this work, we propose a new and equivalent formalism that does not require DAGs to describe them, viewed as fixed-point problems on the causally ordered variables, and we show three important cases where they can be uniquely recovered given the topological ordering (TO). To the best of our knowledge, we obtain the weakest conditions for their recovery when TO is known. Based on this, we design a two-stage causal generative model that first infers the causal order from observations in a zero-shot manner, thus by-passing the search, and then learns the generative fixed-point SCM on the ordered variables. To infer TOs from observations, we propose to amortize the learning of TOs on generated datasets by sequentially predicting the leaves of graphs seen during training. To learn fixed-point SCMs, we design a transformer-based architecture that exploits a new attention mechanism enabling the modeling of causal structures, and show that this parameterization is consistent with our formalism. Finally, we conduct an extensive evaluation of each method individually, and show that when combined, our model outperforms various baselines on generated out-of-distribution problems.
Read more4/16/2024
📉
0
From Identifiable Causal Representations to Controllable Counterfactual Generation: A Survey on Causal Generative Modeling
Aneesh Komanduri, Xintao Wu, Yongkai Wu, Feng Chen
Deep generative models have shown tremendous capability in data density estimation and data generation from finite samples. While these models have shown impressive performance by learning correlations among features in the data, some fundamental shortcomings are their lack of explainability, tendency to induce spurious correlations, and poor out-of-distribution extrapolation. To remedy such challenges, recent work has proposed a shift toward causal generative models. Causal models offer several beneficial properties to deep generative models, such as distribution shift robustness, fairness, and interpretability. Structural causal models (SCMs) describe data-generating processes and model complex causal relationships and mechanisms among variables in a system. Thus, SCMs can naturally be combined with deep generative models. We provide a technical survey on causal generative modeling categorized into causal representation learning and controllable counterfactual generation methods. We focus on fundamental theory, methodology, drawbacks, datasets, and metrics. Then, we cover applications of causal generative models in fairness, privacy, out-of-distribution generalization, precision medicine, and biological sciences. Lastly, we discuss open problems and fruitful research directions for future work in the field.
Read more5/24/2024
🤷
0
Sample, estimate, aggregate: A recipe for causal discovery foundation models
Menghua Wu, Yujia Bao, Regina Barzilay, Tommi Jaakkola
Causal discovery, the task of inferring causal structure from data, promises to accelerate scientific research, inform policy making, and more. However, causal discovery algorithms over larger sets of variables tend to be brittle against misspecification or when data are limited. To mitigate these challenges, we train a supervised model that learns to predict a larger causal graph from the outputs of classical causal discovery algorithms run over subsets of variables, along with other statistical hints like inverse covariance. Our approach is enabled by the observation that typical errors in the outputs of classical methods remain comparable across datasets. Theoretically, we show that this model is well-specified, in the sense that it can recover a causal graph consistent with graphs over subsets. Empirically, we train the model to be robust to erroneous estimates using diverse synthetic data. Experiments on real and synthetic data demonstrate that this model maintains high accuracy in the face of misspecification or distribution shift, and can be adapted at low cost to different discovery algorithms or choice of statistics.
Read more5/24/2024
🌿
0
Modeling the Data-Generating Process is Necessary for Out-of-Distribution Generalization
Jivat Neet Kaur, Emre Kiciman, Amit Sharma
Recent empirical studies on domain generalization (DG) have shown that DG algorithms that perform well on some distribution shifts fail on others, and no state-of-the-art DG algorithm performs consistently well on all shifts. Moreover, real-world data often has multiple distribution shifts over different attributes; hence we introduce multi-attribute distribution shift datasets and find that the accuracy of existing DG algorithms falls even further. To explain these results, we provide a formal characterization of generalization under multi-attribute shifts using a canonical causal graph. Based on the relationship between spurious attributes and the classification label, we obtain realizations of the canonical causal graph that characterize common distribution shifts and show that each shift entails different independence constraints over observed variables. As a result, we prove that any algorithm based on a single, fixed constraint cannot work well across all shifts, providing theoretical evidence for mixed empirical results on DG algorithms. Based on this insight, we develop Causally Adaptive Constraint Minimization (CACM), an algorithm that uses knowledge about the data-generating process to adaptively identify and apply the correct independence constraints for regularization. Results on fully synthetic, MNIST, small NORB, and Waterbirds datasets, covering binary and multi-valued attributes and labels, show that adaptive dataset-dependent constraints lead to the highest accuracy on unseen domains whereas incorrect constraints fail to do so. Our results demonstrate the importance of modeling the causal relationships inherent in the data-generating process.
Read more5/21/2024